|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crono Leonhart Vice Captain
|
 Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 3:52 pm
moneybags17 _Indignation A) no one plays a 60 card deck B)marron stop deckout for the player nice deck looks VERY similar to the one that was used @ an SJC a few months ago. ok, time to defend my position. 1.) I play a few decks between 60 and 110 cards that are competitive. 2.) marron could be stopped by Nobleman of Crossout, Ancient Gear Beast, or just by not destroying it. and the Clock Tower could be stopped by Prohibition (not reliable) or Cursed Seal of Forbidden Spell (perma-Prohibition). How could you play a 110 card deck...?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:06 pm
Crono Leonhart moneybags17 _Indignation A) no one plays a 60 card deck B)marron stop deckout for the player nice deck looks VERY similar to the one that was used @ an SJC a few months ago. ok, time to defend my position. 1.) I play a few decks between 60 and 110 cards that are competitive. 2.) marron could be stopped by Nobleman of Crossout, Ancient Gear Beast, or just by not destroying it. and the Clock Tower could be stopped by Prohibition (not reliable) or Cursed Seal of Forbidden Spell (perma-Prohibition). How could you play a 110 card deck...? VERY CAREFULLY. actually, i do have a good deck with 104 cards in it right now that i've won quite a few duels with. lately my large decks have been used with the purpose of fueling creatures with removal (Gren Maju De Eiza)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 1:49 pm
moneybags17 Crono Leonhart moneybags17 _Indignation A) no one plays a 60 card deck B)marron stop deckout for the player nice deck looks VERY similar to the one that was used @ an SJC a few months ago. ok, time to defend my position. 1.) I play a few decks between 60 and 110 cards that are competitive. 2.) marron could be stopped by Nobleman of Crossout, Ancient Gear Beast, or just by not destroying it. and the Clock Tower could be stopped by Prohibition (not reliable) or Cursed Seal of Forbidden Spell (perma-Prohibition). How could you play a 110 card deck...? VERY CAREFULLY. actually, i do have a good deck with 104 cards in it right now that i've won quite a few duels with. lately my large decks have been used with the purpose of fueling creatures with removal (Gren Maju De Eiza) let me make this clear. you DO NOT have a GOOD 104 card deck. period. your deck might win but that would only be because either you stack your deck or play kids that suck horribly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 6:53 pm
I can see the guy [above's] point x.x ... It is scary @ the thought that you would use a 104 card deck and claim its good ... this isn't magic where you can make competitive decks with 200+ cards [Battle of Wits FTW]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crono Leonhart Vice Captain
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:38 pm
Okay...While yes, 104 cards would be good to fuel a monster that gains attack points from the amount of monsters in some location, It would be damn near impossible to find him lost in the shuffle of 104 cards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 12:00 pm
@blkaznguy4: i have no clue what magic is like. i wouldn't know a good magic deck if it bit me in the... you know.
@Crono: before Exchange of the Spirit was banned i had a few filter cards like Reasoning to quickly get the 15 cards needed. use that with Dimensional Fissure and then just play Return From the Different Dimension for a severe otk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 12:33 pm
That's figuring you can even FIND a Reasoning in that pile that would be your deck.
104 cards, in Yugioh, is not a deck in the least. It's a stack which will never truly go anywhere unless you play someone who is completely incompetent at the game.
60 cards, while better than that utterly monstrous 104, is still not a good number for a deck. Dropping it below 48 is always the way to go when working towards a strategy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 12:59 pm
Kotoren That's figuring you can even FIND a Reasoning in that pile that would be your deck. 104 cards, in Yugioh, is not a deck in the least. It's a stack which will never truly go anywhere unless you play someone who is completely incompetent at the game. 60 cards, while better than that utterly monstrous 104, is still not a good number for a deck. Dropping it below 48 is always the way to go when working towards a strategy. in some cases that may be true, but you have to calculate the odds of finding certain cards. let's say in a 40 card deck you have 1 reasoning, so your odds of finding it are 1:40. if you have 3 reasonings in your deck you could get the same odds in a 120 card deck. plus, someone did enter a tourney with a 100+ card deck and win a few rounds, so it's not impossible. i'll have to duel using it sometime to prove my point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:09 am
Crono Leonhart moneybags17 _Indignation A) no one plays a 60 card deck B)marron stop deckout for the player nice deck looks VERY similar to the one that was used @ an SJC a few months ago. ok, time to defend my position. 1.) I play a few decks between 60 and 110 cards that are competitive. 2.) marron could be stopped by Nobleman of Crossout, Ancient Gear Beast, or just by not destroying it. and the Clock Tower could be stopped by Prohibition (not reliable) or Cursed Seal of Forbidden Spell (perma-Prohibition). How could you play a 110 card deck...? I remember a kid at the card shop who used to play with every single card he owned lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:47 am
xLucifelx Crono Leonhart moneybags17 _Indignation A) no one plays a 60 card deck B)marron stop deckout for the player nice deck looks VERY similar to the one that was used @ an SJC a few months ago. ok, time to defend my position. 1.) I play a few decks between 60 and 110 cards that are competitive. 2.) marron could be stopped by Nobleman of Crossout, Ancient Gear Beast, or just by not destroying it. and the Clock Tower could be stopped by Prohibition (not reliable) or Cursed Seal of Forbidden Spell (perma-Prohibition). How could you play a 110 card deck...? I remember a kid at the card shop who used to play with every single card he owned lol very weird person then lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 9:01 am
ANYTHING that cancels spells/traps wold completely murder this deck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:08 pm
moneybags17 in some cases that may be true, but you have to calculate the odds of finding certain cards. let's say in a 40 card deck you have 1 reasoning, so your odds of finding it are 1:40. if you have 3 reasonings in your deck you could get the same odds in a 120 card deck. plus, someone did enter a tourney with a 100+ card deck and win a few rounds, so it's not impossible. i'll have to duel using it sometime to prove my point. In a tournament... this would have been in no way a UDE Official tournament with competent players. Not to mention that most people would play the more sensible 3:40 cards if they were wanting to use Reasoning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:07 pm
Kotoren moneybags17 in some cases that may be true, but you have to calculate the odds of finding certain cards. let's say in a 40 card deck you have 1 reasoning, so your odds of finding it are 1:40. if you have 3 reasonings in your deck you could get the same odds in a 120 card deck. plus, someone did enter a tourney with a 100+ card deck and win a few rounds, so it's not impossible. i'll have to duel using it sometime to prove my point. In a tournament... this would have been in no way a UDE Official tournament with competent players. Not to mention that most people would play the more sensible 3:40 cards if they were wanting to use Reasoning. it WAS the world tournament... some kid in Texas used a 100+ card deck to get there but didn't do too well afterward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 3:49 pm
moneybags17 Kotoren moneybags17 in some cases that may be true, but you have to calculate the odds of finding certain cards. let's say in a 40 card deck you have 1 reasoning, so your odds of finding it are 1:40. if you have 3 reasonings in your deck you could get the same odds in a 120 card deck. plus, someone did enter a tourney with a 100+ card deck and win a few rounds, so it's not impossible. i'll have to duel using it sometime to prove my point. In a tournament... this would have been in no way a UDE Official tournament with competent players. Not to mention that most people would play the more sensible 3:40 cards if they were wanting to use Reasoning. it WAS the world tournament... some kid in Texas used a 100+ card deck to get there but didn't do too well afterward. he obv didnt do well cause he was using a 100+ card deck and it was probally just as a joke anyway anywho if youve got aim or yvd or msn then tell me so we can settle that good decks must be 45 cards or less.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:02 pm
_Indignation moneybags17 Kotoren moneybags17 in some cases that may be true, but you have to calculate the odds of finding certain cards. let's say in a 40 card deck you have 1 reasoning, so your odds of finding it are 1:40. if you have 3 reasonings in your deck you could get the same odds in a 120 card deck. plus, someone did enter a tourney with a 100+ card deck and win a few rounds, so it's not impossible. i'll have to duel using it sometime to prove my point. In a tournament... this would have been in no way a UDE Official tournament with competent players. Not to mention that most people would play the more sensible 3:40 cards if they were wanting to use Reasoning. it WAS the world tournament... some kid in Texas used a 100+ card deck to get there but didn't do too well afterward. he obv didnt do well cause he was using a 100+ card deck and it was probally just as a joke anyway anywho if youve got aim or yvd or msn then tell me so we can settle that good decks must be 45 cards or less. tell me how to use aim and you've got a duel friday assuming i'm finished with my 2 tourney matches and my 2 other duels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
