|
|
| Vote |
| Can and will for McCain |
|
14% |
[ 1 ] |
| Can and will for Obama |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| can and will for 3rd party |
|
14% |
[ 1 ] |
| Cannot but would for McCain |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Cannot but would for Obama |
|
42% |
[ 3 ] |
| Cannot but would for 3rd party |
|
28% |
[ 2 ] |
| Could but won't |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 9:28 pm
And I'm sure the people in the US who have lost vast sums of money on medical treatment would love to hear about the evils of socialized medicine.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:25 pm
we are not talking about healthcare in the united states, we were talking about canada's healthcare system. I am not saying ours is perfect just as I am sure you are not attempting to say that yours is better. I just believe that our system fits the needs of a country this size a little better.
There is no such thing as a perfect healthcare system I believe that one should be able to cross the border for healthcare if they so choose. Leave it an option to choose either americas or canadas that way everyone can be happy.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Twizted Humanitarian Crew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:35 am
Actually, I am attempting to say that ours is better. It's flawed, obviously, but certainly better than the US's mess. Sure there are problems, like non-emergency access to MRI's and CT's (problems that would be solved by allowing private companies to compete with the government), but overall, the ability for anyone to walk into a hospital with a (free) health care card and get treated relatively quickly with a quality of care that easily matches the US's, is a great thing.
And if private competition was allowed, Canadians wouldn't need to cross the border for quick diagnostic MRI's.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 9:25 am
invisibleairwaves Actually, I am attempting to say that ours is better. It's flawed, obviously, but certainly better than the US's mess. Sure there are problems, like non-emergency access to MRI's and CT's (problems that would be solved by allowing private companies to compete with the government), but overall, the ability for anyone to walk into a hospital with a (free) health care card and get treated relatively quickly with a quality of care that easily matches the US's, is a great thing. And if private competition was allowed, Canadians wouldn't need to cross the border for quick diagnostic MRI's. Which would hurt the United States' economy, I know I look like a jerk but I am merely looking out my countries economy first, I am merely doing what anybody would do. Also the way I see it, the government has done such a great job with everything we have given them to take charge of, can we really trust them with something as important as healthcare? The way I see it the more someone is paid the more motivated they are going to be to do the best job they can so they don't lose that job. Yes our doctors are paid much much more. I get paid 8.25 at my job, at 19 thats one of the best wages I can expect, it is the best wage I can expect for a job that requires no heavy lifting, with almost no contact with the general public, in fact the public kind of ignores people with my job. My friend however works at meijers, he has to push carts inside in the dead of winter, in the overbearing heat of summer, in the rain and if he complains about it they will tell him oh well. He gets paid minimum wage, from what I've seen I value my job far more than he does, and as a result of that I work better and faster. Government inefficiency is truly legendary here in the states, Socialized healthcare would likely be a disaster here. I suspect that government inefficiency is quite epic in Canada as well but I cannot say for sure, but I ask you one question? Have you ever been treated in the states? If not how can you claim yours is better? I am not trying to claim that our healthcare is imminently superior to yours, but for my family we have enough money we can afford the treament we get here in America, we are happy with our system, so why would we switch?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Twizted Humanitarian Crew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:18 pm
Have you ever been treated in Canada?
I'm sure the US system is just great for the average middle-class household with health insurance that covers whatever problems they have. It's the people who fall outside that group that have issues. In Canada, that isn't a problem; everyone gets quality care.
Yes, government is inherently inefficient to some degree. But you trust them with the military, the police, fire departments, roads, water...why not healthcare?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:18 am
invisibleairwaves Have you ever been treated in Canada? I'm sure the US system is just great for the average middle-class household with health insurance that covers whatever problems they have. It's the people who fall outside that group that have issues. In Canada, that isn't a problem; everyone gets quality care. Yes, government is inherently inefficient to some degree. But you trust them with the military, the police, fire departments, roads, water...why not healthcare? Why is is that we got a lot of people from Canada in my Hometown's hospital? You are on a waiting list for socialized medicine could be forever and a half 'till you get the kidney you need. get one real fast in the U.S.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twizted Humanitarian Crew
|
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:40 am
Personally I would rather have a gun myself than trust the cops.
I live in a nice city with no corruption problems, however just imagine what the healthcare system would have been like in a city led by someone like kwame kilpatrick
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 11:21 pm
Canada's health care rules compared to the US's. The people are healthier, Canada has a higher life expectancy than the US.
Profit motive sucks for health care in a free market: getting paid a lot of money will motivate some people to work hard but it will motivate most people to cut costs. Doctors all over the US get preferred treatment and referrals from insurance companies if they keep costs low. This means that a doctor in the US will make MORE money and have MORE patients referred to them if they DO NOT provide care. Profit motive is great for making computer chips, but absolutely terrible for taking care of people's health.
Doctors in the UK make quite a bit of money too. I don't know how it compares to US doctors' pay but it is quite enough to attract talented minds to the field. Doctors in the UK also have incentive programs for extra profit. They get bonuses to their salary for convincing NHS patients to quit smoking! This improves the average health of the people and saves the government money as healthy people need fewer expensive medical treatments. The life expectancy in the UK is also higher than in the US.
The US's economy is not the issue. Your right that in terms of cash in hand, people would probably have less money every month due to the taxes required to fund a socialized health care system. However, the average amount of money people spend on health care and insurance is a significant portion of their income. So what if I pay more taxes? I then DO NOT have to pay for expensive insurance and DO NOT have to pay for medical care! At worst the money evens out and the population is more healthy. Long tern, as average health improves, the cost to the government will go down and the people save money.
Worries over the economy are simply scare tactics by the owners of insurance companies voiced through the politicians who's campaigns they paid for.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twizted Humanitarian Crew
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:52 am
mr_zoot Canada's health care rules compared to the US's. The people are healthier, Canada has a higher life expectancy than the US. Profit motive sucks for health care in a free market: getting paid a lot of money will motivate some people to work hard but it will motivate most people to cut costs. Doctors all over the US get preferred treatment and referrals from insurance companies if they keep costs low. This means that a doctor in the US will make MORE money and have MORE patients referred to them if they DO NOT provide care. Profit motive is great for making computer chips, but absolutely terrible for taking care of people's health. Doctors in the UK make quite a bit of money too. I don't know how it compares to US doctors' pay but it is quite enough to attract talented minds to the field. Doctors in the UK also have incentive programs for extra profit. They get bonuses to their salary for convincing NHS patients to quit smoking! This improves the average health of the people and saves the government money as healthy people need fewer expensive medical treatments. The life expectancy in the UK is also higher than in the US. The US's economy is not the issue. Your right that in terms of cash in hand, people would probably have less money every month due to the taxes required to fund a socialized health care system. However, the average amount of money people spend on health care and insurance is a significant portion of their income. So what if I pay more taxes? I then DO NOT have to pay for expensive insurance and DO NOT have to pay for medical care! At worst the money evens out and the population is more healthy. Long tern, as average health improves, the cost to the government will go down and the people save money. Worries over the economy are simply scare tactics by the owners of insurance companies voiced through the politicians who's campaigns they paid for. My friend you are ignoring the fact that americans eat more fast food than your average canadian, of course canadians live longer, they have healthier lifestyles. One cannot use life expectancy as the sole measure of ones healthcare without also examining the lifestyles one chooses. We exercise less, we eat crappier its only natural canadians will live longer, also in canada the environment in most places is slighty better for asthmatics as a result of not necessarily being obsessed with industrialization.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:10 am
the difference between Canada's fast food consumption and the US is not that significant. It does not explain the difference in average health alone.
A good portion of health care is preventative care. This means the doctor or other health professionals give official advice on healthy life styles and warn of nutrition problems before they are an issue. In the US, people rarely practice preventative care as is seriously costs $100 just to shake hands with the doctor, much less get medical advice, whereas in Canada, people do not fear the medical bill so there is nothing stopping them from asking their doctor about every little thing.
My doctor tells me to not eat fast food almost every visit, if more people saw the doctor more often, they would get the same expert medical advice, more people would follow it, and the average health of Americans would go up.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:10 pm
mr_zoot Canada's health care rules compared to the US's. The people are healthier, Canada has a higher life expectancy than the US. Why is is that we got a lot of people from Canada in my Hometown's hospital? You are on a waiting list for socialized medicine could be forever and a half 'till you get the kidney you need. get one real fast in the U.S. Besides the health care that we will receive will be sub par of our current and former veterans. Got a Problem? TAKE BUNCHA PILLS IT'LL GO AWAY! mr_zoot Profit motive sucks for health care in a free market: getting paid a lot of money will motivate some people to work hard but it will motivate most people to cut costs. Doctors all over the US get preferred treatment and referrals from insurance companies if they keep costs low. This means that a doctor in the US will make MORE money and have MORE patients referred to them if they DO NOT provide care. Profit motive is great for making computer chips, but absolutely terrible for taking care of people's health. Doctors in the UK make quite a bit of money too. I don't know how it compares to US doctors' pay but it is quite enough to attract talented minds to the field. Doctors in the UK also have incentive programs for extra profit. They get bonuses to their salary for convincing NHS patients to quit smoking! This improves the average health of the people and saves the government money as healthy people need fewer expensive medical treatments. The life expectancy in the UK is also higher than in the US. Get the Government out of Health care all together and prices will surely go down. mr_zoot The US's economy is not the issue. Your right that in terms of cash in hand, people would probably have less money every month due to the taxes required to fund a socialized health care system. However, the average amount of money people spend on health care and insurance is a significant portion of their income. So what if I pay more taxes? I then DO NOT have to pay for expensive insurance and DO NOT have to pay for medical care! At worst the money evens out and the population is more healthy. Long tern, as average health improves, the cost to the government will go down and the people save money. Worries over the economy are simply scare tactics by the owners of insurance companies voiced through the politicians who's campaigns they paid for. Not Really, why are the big three asking for money? Why has the stock market been plummeting? Politicians in Washington are working really hard to 'pretend' that economy is doing bad, so universal health care will not happen.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:20 pm
Sith_Master_Steve mr_zoot Canada's health care rules compared to the US's. The people are healthier, Canada has a higher life expectancy than the US. Why is is that we got a lot of people from Canada in my Hometown's hospital? You are on a waiting list for socialized medicine could be forever and a half 'till you get the kidney you need. get one real fast in the U.S. Besides the health care that we will receive will be sub par of our current and former veterans. Got a Problem? TAKE BUNCHA PILLS IT'LL GO AWAY! Kidney waiting lists have less to do with efficiency and more to do with availability of compatible organs. There may be waiting lists for non-emergency treatment, which might encourage well-to-do Canadians to pop over the border for an MRI, but the OVERALL health of the population is higher. A lot of people in the US do not go to the doctor as often as they would because of high costs or lack of insurance coverage. If everybody in the US went to the doctor every time they needed to, regardless of cost, we would have longer waits in line as well. Emergency patients are always given priority, nobody bleeds to death in the waiting room. The inconvenience of a waiting list is insignificant compared to the benefit to the health of our population. You may be irritated by your wait in line, but entire demographics of people would now have access to health care when they previously did not. The benefit to the overall health of society would be enormous. The care we would receive would not be sub-par. A universal system would eliminate the incentive to cut costs which encourages doctors to withhold treatment in exchange for patient referrals by insurance companies. The care for most people would be far superior to joke of treatment they get today. Take a buncha pills indeed.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twizted Humanitarian Crew
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:57 am
well that really depends on who you ask, now doesn't it?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:58 pm
mr_zoot Sith_Master_Steve mr_zoot Canada's health care rules compared to the US's. The people are healthier, Canada has a higher life expectancy than the US. Why is is that we got a lot of people from Canada in my Hometown's hospital? You are on a waiting list for socialized medicine could be forever and a half 'till you get the kidney you need. get one real fast in the U.S. Besides the health care that we will receive will be sub par of our current and former veterans. Got a Problem? TAKE BUNCHA PILLS IT'LL GO AWAY! Kidney waiting lists have less to do with efficiency and more to do with availability of compatible organs. There may be waiting lists for non-emergency treatment, which might encourage well-to-do Canadians to pop over the border for an MRI, but the OVERALL health of the population is higher. A lot of people in the US do not go to the doctor as often as they would because of high costs or lack of insurance coverage. If everybody in the US went to the doctor every time they needed to, regardless of cost, we would have longer waits in line as well. Emergency patients are always given priority, nobody bleeds to death in the waiting room. The inconvenience of a waiting list is insignificant compared to the benefit to the health of our population. You may be irritated by your wait in line, but entire demographics of people would now have access to health care when they previously did not. The benefit to the overall health of society would be enormous. The care we would receive would not be sub-par. A universal system would eliminate the incentive to cut costs which encourages doctors to withhold treatment in exchange for patient referrals by insurance companies. The care for most people would be far superior to joke of treatment they get today. Take a buncha pills indeed. For Diabetics or those with Heart Problems it is the Sux0rs! Get the Government out with most of their regulations we'd be golden But, as you said before Universal Healthcare will probably will not happen because the insurance industry is a big money maker in this country.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 12:20 am
Why would diabetics and heart patients have it tough? is it because their visits are not emergency? or is it the cost of their drugs? In the UK, drugs are covered by the NHS and every single prescription from pain killers to protease inhibitors costs $10 or less. Free for seniors or indigents.
What government regulations are you talking about that make health care more expensive? Surely not safety regulations or training standards for medical professionals? Or the rule that says indigent emergency patients get emergency care even if they can't pay?
Your right about the power of insurance companies and Pharmas. They are practically an insurmountable barrier with their lobbying power and campaign contributions. The result is we get these half assed, quasi-universal health plans that use existing insurance companies as a mechanism of health coverage instead of just paying for it directly with tax dollars. I realize that Hillary Clinton's health care defeat in the 90's, despite a democratic president AND senate, was epic and current proposals seem to reflect that reality.....but it still stings.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|