Welcome to Gaia! ::

Politicians of Gaia

Back to Guilds

A place for debates of political/social values and ideas 

Tags: Politics, debate, Conservtive, Liberal, Moderate 

Reply Debate Forum
What an idiot Goto Page: 1 2 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Twizted Humanitarian
Crew

PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:13 pm


Top Global Warming Advocate: Jupiter & Saturn Closer To Sun Than Earth
Live Earth kingpin dismantles his own credibility on national radio as propaganda bandwagon is massive flop
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Monday, July 9, 2007


Live Earth's half empty stadiums and lackluster TV viewing figures were preceded by another embarrassment after one of the propaganda bandwagon's kingpins and a top global warming advocate responded to a question about solar-system wide climate change by claiming that Jupiter, Mars and Saturn were closer to the sun than Earth.

David Mayer de Rothschild is the youngest child (born 197 cool of Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, of the British wing of the Rothschild banking family.

Rothschild's recent book, 77 Essential Skills to Stop Climate Changes, calls for ordinary people to limit outward behavior and even work at home and was used as part of the PR blitz to accompany the Live Earth project.


Appearing on The Alex Jones Show this past Friday, Rothschild reacted to a point about massive climate change at every point of the solar system and its relation to natural sun cycles by claiming Mars, Saturn and Jupiter were closer to the sun than Earth!

Here's a brief transcript of the exchange.

ALEX JONES: "The polar icecaps of Mars are receding at several miles a year, much faster than ours and that the moons of Saturn and Jupiter are melting, in fact several of their moons were ice and are now liquid seas - how are SUV's causing that David Rothschild?

ROTHSCHILD: "Because those planets are closer to the sun, my friend."

ALEX JONES: "No, Jupiter and Saturn are not closer to the sun and neither is Mars."

Rothschild then quickly changes the subject and when the point is raised again later in the show, he makes no effort to correct himself.

Click here for the clip. Listen to the full MP3 of the interview by clicking here.

Last time we checked, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn were all orbiting the sun at a greater distance than Earth.



Rothschild's hilarious screw-up is yet another example as to why the general public remain unconvinced by the error-strewn apocalyptic admonitions of the climate cult.

A Mori poll released last week found that a majority of the UK population were still skeptical about man-made global warming and believed the threats were being exaggerated for political purposes and to make money.

Throughout the radio appearance, Rothschild parrots empty sound bite platitudes about there only being "one earth," while failing to address recent scientific analysis which reveals that the oldest plant DNA ever discovered showed that "the planet was far warmer hundreds of thousands of years ago than is generally believed," again underscoring the fact that climate change is a routine and natural phenomenon that has occurred throughout earth's history.

Although Rothschild stresses the existence of just one earth on numerous occasions, it appears as though he thinks there is another one earth orbiting the sun - at a greater distance than Saturn or Jupiter!

He also glibly repeats the charge that the radio station he was appearing on, the Genesis Communications Network, was bankrolled by the oil industry and that was the reason for challenging the monopoly on truth that the man-made global warming crowd attribute themselves.

Deliciously ironic therefore it is that big oil men like the chairman of British Petroleum Peter Sutherland are fanning the flames of global warming hysteria in order to create artificial scarcity and drive up prices, while also getting fat off the peak oil scam, another charade manufactured by the oil companies and gleefully embraced by phony environmentalists.
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 12:17 am


I also subscribe ot the "global warming is natural" theory. Else, how would the planet have warmed up after the Ice Age?

uryu ishida


Twizted Humanitarian
Crew

PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:38 am


uryu ishida
I also subscribe ot the "global warming is natural" theory. Else, how would the planet have warmed up after the Ice Age?

thank you finally someone agrees with me on this issue or for that matter how would the planet plunge into an ice age before we even existed, unless warming and cooling are natural occurences
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:07 am


I think global warming is natural but all the palution and CO2 in the air is making a bit worse.

James628
Vice Captain


thenerdqueen

PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 12:31 pm


Yes, global warming is somewhat natural, but our carbon dioxide leftovers have heated the planet, I agree James.
Just a question:
Is this going to be beneficial for humans?
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 8:43 pm


Benefecial for humans? IN the long run no. At some point in time, just liek in the past, the old species will need to be killed off so that the new, young species can evolve and grow. Some day humans will reach the status of "old".

uryu ishida


James628
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:42 pm


thenerdqueen
Yes, global warming is somewhat natural, but our carbon dioxide leftovers have heated the planet, I agree James.
Just a question:
Is this going to be beneficial for humans?
it could be beneficial if you dont like polar bears
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 9:34 pm


Then, as the instinct for survival of the species kicks in, global warming is bad.

thenerdqueen


Rainbow Coloured

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:12 am


uryu ishida
I also subscribe ot the "global warming is natural" theory. Else, how would the planet have warmed up after the Ice Age?

Exactly! It is so nice to find someone who has also put two and two together! There have been fluctuations in temperature in the past, otherwise how could their have been an Ice Age? We are complaining about it been warm now and the polar ice-caps melting, but in Medieval times, the Earth was considerably warmer than it is now!

The reason people in government are clinging onto the whole global warming thing is because it's good bait for elections! Maybe the politician in question does believe in it, but they are still using it as leverage in their quest to gain power of the country. There are several people in power who don't believe in it, I'm sure. Yet if there was no global warming worry, they wouldn't have much for the foundations of their election argument. So they make out it's an 'end of the world!!1' problem and tell people how they'll solve it to get them more votes.

Hundreds of thousands of people are employed by the government and other organisations as 'global warming scientists' to look up facts up, like the carbon footprint rubbish and etc. If they were to stop this whole charade, hundreds and thousands of people would be thrown into unemployment! That's the last thing anyone wants, so they keep quiet about it.

People go on about how much difference we'll make if we just cut down our carbon when volcanoes produce millions of tonnes more than all the living things and man-made machines combined the world over. So, unless they're going to slam a cork into the volcanoes, I don't see how going to all this trouble would even make a dent on it. Don't get me wrong, I think it would be nice and all, but still, all this preaching of false information drives me round the bend.

One last bit of food for thought: You see programmes where there is video footage of the ice-caps melting and crumbling. The chances are, the footage is recycled or they have been hanging around for weeks to catch such a thing.

♥
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:31 am


But global warming, whether it is natural, man-made, or a coalition of the two, is still bad, both for our species and others. I live in California, and the temperature during the summer is usually around 110 degrees - without an air conditioner, we would be in trouble. If the world gets any warmer, people may have to evacuate the United States most populus state. Global warming is bad.

PS. Who cares if some man forgot the order of the planets during a television show on the Earth's global warming; he was probably just nervous.

thenerdqueen


Rainbow Coloured

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:54 am


thenerdqueen
But global warming, whether it is natural, man-made, or a coalition of the two, is still bad, both for our species and others. I live in California, and the temperature during the summer is usually around 110 degrees - without an air conditioner, we would be in trouble. If the world gets any warmer, people may have to evacuate the United States most populus state. Global warming is bad.

I agree, it is bad and it is something that needs seeing to. However, I don't think that global warming is going to bring the end of the earth just yet. I honstly believe people should be encouraged to be more energy and carbon efficient now, but the the press, media and powerful political figures should not be making us panic just to get viewings/votes.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:07 pm


And that's reason #497 why I don't life in California. WHere I live, the average fluctuates form 85~90 adn ventures into the 100's rarely. IT onyl happened ONCE last year, and hasn't happened yet at all this year.

Since global warming seems natural, I'd say just let it go. The human species may not want to die, but a mass exctintion WILL happen while humans are around eventually. Then the planet will start the cycle over again.

uryu ishida


Verderbnis

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:51 pm


thenerdqueen
Yes, global warming is somewhat natural, but our carbon dioxide leftovers have heated the planet, I agree James.
Just a question:
Is this going to be beneficial for humans?


It is beneficial for countries like russia, which has incredible possibilities to become the economical power number one in future.

Guess what happens if their icy desert melts down and the ground becomes useable for aggriculture and oilwinning!

-Right, they could kick the USA and EU into the bin with one snap.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:32 pm


Hellraver
thenerdqueen
Yes, global warming is somewhat natural, but our carbon dioxide leftovers have heated the planet, I agree James.
Just a question:
Is this going to be beneficial for humans?


It is beneficial for countries like russia, which has incredible possibilities to become the economical power number one in future.

Guess what happens if their icy desert melts down and the ground becomes useable for aggriculture and oilwinning!

-Right, they could kick the USA and EU into the bin with one snap.


Would that please you?

Bezant

Original Explorer

14,475 Points
  • Prayer Circle 200
  • Invisibility 100
  • Overstocked 200

Verderbnis

PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:12 am


Cherry Sodah
Hellraver
thenerdqueen
Yes, global warming is somewhat natural, but our carbon dioxide leftovers have heated the planet, I agree James.
Just a question:
Is this going to be beneficial for humans?


It is beneficial for countries like russia, which has incredible possibilities to become the economical power number one in future.

Guess what happens if their icy desert melts down and the ground becomes useable for aggriculture and oilwinning!

-Right, they could kick the USA and EU into the bin with one snap.


Would that please you?


No because Putin is someone who is nothing more like a neofacist, incarcering the opposition and surpressing depending countries. So I can't say it would please me.
Reply
Debate Forum

Goto Page: 1 2 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum