|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:32 pm
For every side of belief that you believe in, there's always an a*****e antagonist for that.
Pro-choice illustrates my point well. Our antagonists, being the pro-lifers.
The Atheists have the Christians.
The Fine Arts people have the Thomas Kinkade supporters.
The Frugal people have the callous spendthrifts.
The Psychology people have the anti-medication Scientologists.
The Conservatives have the Liberals.
This is a life lesson derived from my personal observations. So when you join a group or pattern yourself to an interest or hobby, do you also think about the potential antagonists that may harass you or just plain rain on your parade?
It's important to do so because believe it or not, the antagonists have as much participation and influence in your group and beliefs. They are outsiders, but they still influence. They have enough influence to ruin your mood, which is potent enough in my book.
I, for one, love pro-choice, I have observed pro-choice people as more informed, intelligent, diverse in background and in other talents. I feel like my life is enriched by being around pro-choicers.
But I HATE pro-lifers. Such a stuck up little uniform fundie group they are. I'm so well informed about their beliefs and their belief system that it makes me sick thinking about them. I am beyond bothering to debate with them because it would mean legitimizing their beliefs, which I do not. Legitimizing their personal beliefs give them too much power already in their attempt to oppress other people's rights.
What's your view on my observations?
Not just about pro-life, but about other groups you've been involved with?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 9:35 pm
I think you're right to a degree, but not always. Pro-choice is a polarizing decision, as is pro-life... however, one can be Christian without being antagonizing to an Atheist, and vice-versa, it all depends on attitude, because neither of those NECESSARILY excludes the other view, though some people holding these views do exclude them. Pro-choice necessarily excludes pro-life.
So... there are always antagonists, but in many of the cases, don't forget the people in the middle.
And, I don't hate the opposing side... even the Neo-Nazis (I'm Jewish) or the pro-life people. Hate is too powerful, too destructive an emotion to waste on them. Occasionally, it's pity, like for the two girls in Prussian Blue who were brought up Neo-Nazi, and never really had a choice as to how they turn out. An ideology is too vauge to hate someone over. It has to affect me personally before I can hate. Be disgusted with, mad at, willing to fight their opinions with all my being... that I can do. Hate, however... It's too powerful for me to waste on people who just plain don't share my beliefs.
And their beliefs are legitimate. Wrong, but legitamate. A PERSONAL belief is always legitamate in my book. Their forcing their personal belief on others is where they go wrong in my mind.
But, then, I'm extremely pro-free speech, pro-freedom... to a point. Basically, you can say what you want, and do what you want UNTIL that affects me in a negative way that's avoidable. For example, taking away my bodily domain is an avoidable negative effect. Having to wait until you're done checking out your groceries until I can check out mine is unavoidable... or at least a case where "first come, first serve" applies.
This philosophy doesn't always apply well, so I modify it when necessary, but in the pro-choice/pro-life it isn't. The pro-lifers have every right to say what they believe, and I have every right to counter-protest.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:30 pm
Hate is a strong emotion, and it has enough influence over my life as it is, I do not want to hurt myself anymore in the process of hating and add more hate to this already hate filled world. Sure I disagree with people, with their ideologies, morals, beliefs, I may think they are ******** stupid and wonder how they continue on living, I may detest everything they stand for and everything they are, but I do not hate them. I try as hard as I can not to hate people. I'm a very forgiving person, and one who is constantly longing for forgiveness from others, espcially those whom I might have hurt not knowing I did so. People's hate has scarred me, both mentally and physically, and select people's hate have put a black hole in my heart that hurts soo much to the point that I wish no one else to feel that hurt.
I have many enemies, but I also have many friends. I refuse to hate my enemies, I will not waste such a strong emotion or energy on them. But I will forgive them. And just like my friends, I promise to commit their names, faces etc. to memory. Because they've changed my life in someway, whether for the good or bad. It's the least I can do, out of respect.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 5:53 am
Grip of Death The Atheists have the Christians. The Fine Arts people have the Thomas Kinkade supporters. The Frugal people have the callous spendthrifts. The Psychology people have the anti-medication Scientologists. The Conservatives have the Liberals. I don't think any of these represent an antagonist sort of relationship. Atheists tend not to care what Christians are doing until and unless it affects them. The rest of the country can believe in God, Santa Claus, and purple people eaters for all they care, until they start legislating about it. Fine arts connaisseurs may roll their eyes at Thomas Kinkade, but how many Thomas Kinkade lovers are picketing to have "Gingerbread Cottage" displayed in the Louvre? Grip of Death This is a life lesson derived from my personal observations. So when you join a group or pattern yourself to an interest or hobby, do you also think about the potential antagonists that may harass you or just plain rain on your parade? It's important to do so because believe it or not, the antagonists have as much participation and influence in your group and beliefs. They are outsiders, but they still influence. They have enough influence to ruin your mood, which is potent enough in my book. Mood ruining isn't enough for me to not BELIEVE something. "I would be an atheist, but then the Christians would rain on my parade"? I can't even fathom having a thought process where that sort of sentiment is possible. "I would start loving fine art, but then I would have to hate Thomas Kinkade's masterpieces"? "I would be pro-choice, but then pro-lifers would try to guilt trip me"? I don't hate pro-lifers. I don't hate single people, or Windows users, people who knit, people who love pink, major party members, Christians, coffee drinkers, or dentists, though I am not in any of those groups. I reserve hatred for the specific individuals who INTENTIONALLY make my life suck. Pro-lifers are, in general, not motivated by a desire to make life suck. They really think they are doing the right thing. I think they are terribly misguided, but I just can't hate someone for being misguided. RoseRose mentioned the girls in Prussian Blue, which is a great example. They just don't know any better. So many pro-lifers are the same way. They were raised in a situation where pro-life ideology is normal, and pro-choice is bad. They just don't know any better. And when you've been raised that way, it can be VERY difficult to change. It was hard for me to realize that so much of what I had grown up believing was wrong. A lot of people never get to where they are willing to accept that.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 2:15 pm
I personally dislike the view that there is a dichotomy in views between two extremes... it is a significant reason why oppression and the major "ism"s exist.
The reason sexism exists is because people assume men and women are opposites, instead of just different beings on a scale or gradient that fall in many locations between the two extremes. Men are strong, therefore women are weak. Men are smart, therefore women are stupid. By assuming women can't be like men (who in this patriarchy have a monopoly on all the "good" traits), women are believed to be inferior... and where a woman dares to be "like a man" instead of "feminine" by loving math, instead of loving childbirth and nannying, she is berated for not being a "real" woman.
Ignorance about the various sexualities exist because people assume you are gay or you are straight, never understanding that human sexuality is any one of the shades of grey between that black and white. Many people who are willing to accept homosexuals and discuss homosexual rights are appalled, confused, and even opposed to discussing transexual rights, asexual rights, or any other sexuality's rights.
In the same way racism and xenophobia exist because people insist upon beliving in this one or the other split. If you aren't white you are black. Since whites have the power (like men) they get the first claim to all the "good" traits. Because you have ONE difference from us (your skin tone) this means you are completely different on a completely opposite end of the spectrum. The same with your culture - if it does not mimic ours identically, your one or two small differences makes all your apparent similarities completely unimportant, thus granting the majority that sees you as this opposite the notion you don't deserve equal treatment.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 12:03 pm
I don't have to make anyone else legitimize my own beliefs. If it feels good to me, then I'll go ahead and do whatever the hell I want. I will make a disclaimer in that my beliefs and actions aren't necessarily the opinions or beliefs of every and any group I am affiliated with, though.
If your beliefs help you, then good.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 7:44 pm
Everyone keeps saying "hate is too strong a word." Well, I guess I've always been a very emotional and angry person, I guess this is a flaw or a weakness that I should, looking at the big picture, feel guilty for, but I admit that I do truly hate pro-lifers.
I can't say that I respect or feel kindness towards any person who, deep down in their heart, beleives that a fertilized egg is more important than a woman. I know that there are different types and degrees of pro-life, and for some of them, I do just feel a mild pity or dislike. The ones who are just ignorant piss me off a lot, but I think that if they really understood the issue they would take a more realistic look at it. I pity the mildly-brainwashed and misinformed. The ones who claim to be pro-life but are really just pro-life personal, pro-choice political and don't know that it makes them technically pro-choice I pity, too. They want so badly to not hurt any living thing that they think "pro-life" is as good and as accurate as it sounds. But the pro-lifers who are pro-punishment and honestly beleive that a woman has no right to control her own body are the most disgusting people on the face of the earth. The ones who call themselves "pro-life" and support war, hunting/factory farms, the death penalty, and do not care about better healthcare for children and pregnant women or comprehensive sex education and access to contraception are revolting hypocrites. Basically, any pro-"life" person I can't pity is one that I hate.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:48 pm
I can't say that I hate pro-lifers. I do not like their cause, I do not like their opinion on abortion and I certainly do not like that their propaganda-drenched beliefs are being treated like legitimate legislation material. But I do not know every single pro-lifer as a person, therefore in my view, I cannot hate them. They aren't fetus-humping machines, they're people. I don't hate on entire groups of people. That's a mass generalization. As much as I despise the pro-life movement and their insistence that a fetus is more important than a born person, I simply can't hate every single pro-lifer.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|