|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:46 am
Which QB would you want your team to have?
If these two hadn't gone to the draft early we would have had the worst Class of QBs in a while [removed]emoticon(' arrow ') arrow
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 11:01 am
My team has a QB so neather
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 2:21 pm
identity7 Which QB would you want your team to have? If these two hadn't gone to the draft early we would have had the worst Class of QBs in a while [removed]emoticon(' arrow ') arrow we already have one of the worst classes in a while, if these guys came out with tebow, mccoy and bradford these guys would be round 2-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 9:25 pm
I'll give Stafford the slight edge over the other QBs. Sanchez and Freeman are very good, and look promising. All three have potential. But Stafford has the physicality and experience that will make him selected before the others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:21 am
Most experts I've seen have put Stafford over Sanchez. And with Division Rival Chicago getting stronger at the QB position by aquiring Jay Cutler, I think Detroit will be desperate to get a potential Franchise QB for the future of their franchise and will most likely go with Stafford.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 7:31 pm
I don't know what's with the recent hot rise of Mark Sanchez. In the last few days, experts have mostly put him going to the Seattle Seahawks at #4 overall. But I still think that he won't go that early in the Draft.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 12:47 am
Dude-LAP I'll give Stafford the slight edge over the other QBs. Sanchez and Freeman are very good, and look promising. All three have potential. But Stafford has the physicality and experience that will make him selected before the others.
Even though they didn't live up to the hype, Georgia was always in the National spotlight. Moreno helped that too of course... Not like USC wasn't but Stafford was always projected as the more NFL ready QB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:59 pm
I would rather my team trade for Tyler Thigpin if they wanted a quaterback. I don't know much about collage QBs, so I would go with a more proven prospect that has some NFL experience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:57 pm
Valas Hume Dude-LAP I'll give Stafford the slight edge over the other QBs. Sanchez and Freeman are very good, and look promising. All three have potential. But Stafford has the physicality and experience that will make him selected before the others.
Even though they didn't live up to the hype, Georgia was always in the National spotlight. Moreno helped that too of course... Not like USC wasn't but Stafford was always projected as the more NFL ready QBThe only upside about who these QBs play against, is that Sanchez played against the USC defense in practice a lot, with a lot of NFL prospects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:18 pm
i dont know what the hype over both of them are. the lions might not even be drafting stafford. the cutler trade affected this somehow. but overall stafford is better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 6:47 pm
Neither because my Qb is great.
But If I had to choose a backup, then it would be Sanchez because Georgia sucks. Nah, but Stafford is pretty good too. I think I'd choose Stafford though, because he has the experience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:53 pm
imcrazyoompus i dont know what the hype over both of them are. the lions might not even be drafting stafford. the cutler trade affected this somehow. but overall stafford is better. Yeah, I think both guys are getting too much hype. Personally, I don't think that the Lions need a QB as desperately as some other positions. And I don't know why some experts are saying that the Seahawks should take a QB with their #4 overall pick...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 12:27 am
Dude-LAP Valas Hume Dude-LAP I'll give Stafford the slight edge over the other QBs. Sanchez and Freeman are very good, and look promising. All three have potential. But Stafford has the physicality and experience that will make him selected before the others.
Even though they didn't live up to the hype, Georgia was always in the National spotlight. Moreno helped that too of course... Not like USC wasn't but Stafford was always projected as the more NFL ready QBThe only upside about who these QBs play against, is that Sanchez played against the USC defense in practice a lot, with a lot of NFL prospects.
Good point but it also wasn't full out contact. The SEC does produce a ton of NFL quality players, they also feature a more NFL ready conference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:56 pm
There both good QB's but I rather have Stafford he has a stronger arm and has more experience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 9:38 am
Stafford may be the slightly better QB at the moment, but Sanchez will see more immediate success. Mark Sanchez is going to the Jets, where they have a good offensive line, good rushing attack, solid wide receivers, and a good defense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
