Musa Nocturna
(?)Community Member
- Posted: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 05:13:36 +0000
Dearest reviewers, fanbrats, and loyal squee-squad
Some authors no doubt love having their own private cheerleaders. Some authors even write for these people, for some inscrutable reason. However, some writers are superior to needing an ego boost every time they string together a sentence. They show genuine promise. Maybe not true talent (since if they had that, they would not have a squee squad. These things seem to be mutually exclusive for some reason) but enough potential to be good writers.
Except you, dear squee squad, are holding them back. The story they're working on has said potential. It has a plot that is reasonably involving. The characters are sufficiently deep. The writing passes for interesting. Then YOU go and ask that everything about it turns into happy fluffy bunnies and ejaculated rainbows, with one or more happy endings (preferably before the plot reaches a climax in the first place). Somehow, the squee squad wishes the authors they worship to remain in the swamp of mediocrity, forever churning out more tripe that is only readable by someone with extraordinary sugar tolerance.
Please, stop it. Before someone gets hurt. You don't even have to give concrit. Leave that to the professionals. (or at least the masochists) Just take a step back from the story after you finish reading. Take a look. What made the story interesting? Maybe the character's pain? The trouble they were having in their life? The way the entire world seems to collapse before it starts getting better?
Now, imagine you take that away.... you would no longer have the story you just read. And it's the story you read that you're supposed to comment on, not the story without the actual story.
Find what you found interesting, not what you would like in a purely ideal world. Let the author know what you found.
Your author will thank you for it. Eventually.
Some authors no doubt love having their own private cheerleaders. Some authors even write for these people, for some inscrutable reason. However, some writers are superior to needing an ego boost every time they string together a sentence. They show genuine promise. Maybe not true talent (since if they had that, they would not have a squee squad. These things seem to be mutually exclusive for some reason) but enough potential to be good writers.
Except you, dear squee squad, are holding them back. The story they're working on has said potential. It has a plot that is reasonably involving. The characters are sufficiently deep. The writing passes for interesting. Then YOU go and ask that everything about it turns into happy fluffy bunnies and ejaculated rainbows, with one or more happy endings (preferably before the plot reaches a climax in the first place). Somehow, the squee squad wishes the authors they worship to remain in the swamp of mediocrity, forever churning out more tripe that is only readable by someone with extraordinary sugar tolerance.
Please, stop it. Before someone gets hurt. You don't even have to give concrit. Leave that to the professionals. (or at least the masochists) Just take a step back from the story after you finish reading. Take a look. What made the story interesting? Maybe the character's pain? The trouble they were having in their life? The way the entire world seems to collapse before it starts getting better?
Now, imagine you take that away.... you would no longer have the story you just read. And it's the story you read that you're supposed to comment on, not the story without the actual story.
Find what you found interesting, not what you would like in a purely ideal world. Let the author know what you found.
Your author will thank you for it. Eventually.