Welcome to Gaia! ::

I completely agree with you.

Yay! Break out the pie!

Repeat after me, kids: no single concept is inherently bad, it's how it's written.

The 'save the world' trope is overworn and inherently implausible, but I will excuse it in the right setting. It fits in perfectly in genres which already contain high levels of implausibility, such as superhero comics.

I'm inclined to agree with your points - I can remember thinking, as a young 'un, that it was interesting how the world gets saved all the time in films and books, and there's never been such an event in real life - but the concept's really not that bad if the story is otherwise compelling and fun.

Still, there are other more interesting things to be worked with, and stories more complex and deep than your typical epic quest tale are to be welcomed.

I agree - epic quests are generally boring, but can be made interesting with a little creativity.

Actually I write mostly fantasy. xd Not, the epic sort though, it's too boring for me actually. And, this may come as a surprise, but fantasy should be true to the principles of real life. Just a thought.
And it's hard to think up a reason for the end of the world. An evil invader is not the end. A great plague isn't either. The same goes for other great disasters.
And, no; teenagers could not save the world.

Sometimes, you can save the world in reality. Like, for instance, putting a stop to an imminent nuclear disaster in, say, Iran. It's completely realistic if you're into that whole "Why is the Iranian President getting better Constitutional rights than us American citizens?" thing.

This is how my 'epic' is going to work.

My main character learns that his world is very small, and composed of patchwork elements that don't make much sense. He's able to remove these patchwork elements by saying that they don't make any sense, but by doing so, he's just made the world that much smaller.

This kid was born with this power -- he wasn't really chosen, that's just the way things are for him. But because of that, the world will probably be destroyed little by little, until there's nothing left to survive on. It may be easy to kill one person, but the killer who understands why this guy could destroy parts of the world so easily will begin to think like him, whether he likes it or not. The killer has the life on his conscience and will not help but ponder why he had to kill the guy, and even though it's for the greater good, he'll acknowledge that things don't make much sense either, and will start to destroy the world, too. Ideas are contagious.

I refuse to believe that in the reader's life, everything has always made perfect sense, or when it hasn't, they've always received an intelligent, sensical response; many times, they're yelled at for questioning. Life doesn't work perfectly, and though little bits of the world aren't destroyed because they make no sense, but everyone's felt punishment for speaking up, and like the main character, may have learned to keep their mouth shut in fear.

Who says the characters in the epic have to be larger than life? Let's just look at them realistically. Also, because the main character is more likely to destroy the world than to save it, he doesn't have to be a paragon of perfection like these saviors have to be.

I can't exactly argue with the last point, though, but there are also too many high-school stories, stories warning about drug use, stories about vampires, stories about World War II, political satires, and science fiction that speculates on genetics, but you don't see anyone stopping those, either.