Urine Pot the Hero
We rode the snake to the ancient lake;
his skin was cold and he was old,
too old to realize
that what slid past weren't paddies -
weren't hootches or villages or
the shed skins of his ancestors:
we saw his scales dissolve away,
saw the poison pools of his brood's
silent raucous desperation
turn his scutes transparent,
and the patterns beneath blew our minds.
Still, we put our jackboots on before dawn
and we fought and we prayed and we prayed and we prayed;
still, the faces of the miscellaneous old divines
in the ancient gallery (all dressed up in travesties)
looked down on us with voluptuous contempt.
I'm not sure about the internal rhymes in the first stanza. With all due respect to Jim. I'm not totally opposed to it, but it seems at odds with the language of the rest of the piece. I don't know which is the what of that. In terms of word choice altogether, the poem slips into a higher diction later and drops again and then raises itself again, and I'm open to the notion that such a thing might be purposeful, but I'm not seeing it right now.
I wonder: If all those things that "slip past" aren't what they appear, then what are they? That they're merely the hallucinations of the moment is my first thought, given the goings-on of the snake-riding, but the reality of the passing features could be quite illuminating.
That "silent raucous desperation" lines isn't doing it for me. Also, the diction really jumps to its highest, here, before immediately turning more simplistic with the patterns' blowing of minds. Which seems an idea worth exploring further, by the by.
The repetition of the "prayed" seems like a weaker fill-in for delving into imagery with that, perhaps.
The closing of the poem takes a turn about which I'm unsure. The ultimate stanza begins moving toward the personal or immediate for the speaker, which feels right to me, but then it turns away from the specific in favor of a more abstract line I'm not sure I entirely follow. I can place some Viet Nam era meaning to it, but I'm unsure I'd do so so easily without the mention of the film in the thread title. Well, probably would, I think, but still. At any rate, it feels as though it clouds rather than further informs, and I'm just generally left feeling denied, throughout the entirety of the piece, that plunge to a connection between the motif and the humanity behind the poem.
Good stuff. Thanks for sharing.