Se Ga Takai
I would consider "Priesthood Authority" teh Same as "Position in the Church", I was Baptized by a Pastor, which is teh SDA Equivelant to your Bishop, if not higher. So I see it as the same.
...only the "priesthood authority" in the LDS church is a lay authority. Most likely his father baptized him, not his bishop. If you honestly believe that your pastor was called of God, then the authority is exactly the same, in your beliefs.
My general opinion for the legitimacy of a baptism is that a person must
believe that the ordination was from a direct line of priesthood authority. Otherwise the baptism is utterly vain and foolish - who can honestly believe in a baptism performed by an unclean hand?
sweatdrop
Se Ga Takai
I was making a point. We were both Baptized in teh Name of Christ. You were not Baptized in the Name of Mormon, or Moroni, or Joseph Smith, But Christ. The same goes for me, I was not Baptized in the name of Ellen G. White, But Christ.
...but the LDS Church refuses to ratify any baptism that it itself has not performed. I would consider that fairly good recordkeeping practice rather than as a condemnation of any remnant priesthood authority in the earth.
Take, for example, the hereditary priesthood of Aaron. If there were legitimate extra-LDS priests out there in the world that were baptizing people in the name of Christ, would the baptism in and of itself not be legitimate? Yet without the proper records and authentification of the baptism, I don't believe that the LDS Church could honestly accept the baptism, and would most likely re-baptize the individual just in case.