buggsie blue
(?)Community Member
- Posted: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 02:05:00 +0000
Ever have that one person in the Whoverse who had the potential to be a kickass character and then, bam, bad writing ruins them? What about the one that was kickass and bad writing made their end be both stupid and totally unlogical?
What character's should've, could've, would've been written better?
I don't have much time watching classic who, so I won't go on about CW.
For new who, i think Martha had so much more potential that didn't hit until her season was over. She was straight up awesome in her season, but her unrequited love for the Doctor held her back. She became badass when she decided to stop pining over him, but we only get to see this in a few episodes in Donna's season.
Speaking of Donna, her end was total BS, I think. I mean, Doctor 2 is human with a timelord consciousness, why isn't he dead? Or is he dead and the Doctor knew he would die but left him with Rose anyway? Why do we only see Donna going haywire at the end of the episode? If her mind was burning up from having everything the Doctor knows in her head, why didn't she burn up way earlier? Even so, why did the Doctor have to totally wipe her mind? He could have done what he did to Rose in S1, or he could have pulled a Frozen and left the personal growth but erased him from her memory. Even better, why not use the thing he used in S3 to turn himself human? Can't he make her timelord? Why not just lock up the parts of her mind that contain most of what he knows? I feel like RTD wrote her end this way so that Moffat wouldn't kill her off or something. And hell, it's not like they couldn't bring her back. I mean, ******** Moffat brought back the Timelords after it was well established by RTD that Gallifrey burned to a crisp.
On to Moffat, why did Amy have to see so many ******** psychiatrists? Having an imaginary friend isn't that bad. Also, why hell does Amy have to wait 5 or 6 episodes into her first season to get a real personality, only to still feel like a stiff character? Same with River. And if she's getting younger as the Doctor gets older, then wouldn't she still be alive, or did I miss something? At the end of season 7 part one, why can't the Doctor just travel forward a few years in time have have them meet him in New Jersey or something? That's should be far enough away from 1938 Manhattan, right? Better yet, why did Amy go with Rory when the Angels took him? There's no guarantee she'd be where he was. Better yet, after just dealing with a bunch of murderous statues, why turn away from the obvious weeping angel in the graveyard?
Even the Doctor has some really bad times. There were so many times when the Doctor could have been doing something, and he's just saying something funny while the camera closes up on his face.
So, WTF is wrong with some of the writers here? Which writer do you think ******** up the most? (I go with Moffat, but RTD had some really bad episodes as well.)
What character's should've, could've, would've been written better?
I don't have much time watching classic who, so I won't go on about CW.
For new who, i think Martha had so much more potential that didn't hit until her season was over. She was straight up awesome in her season, but her unrequited love for the Doctor held her back. She became badass when she decided to stop pining over him, but we only get to see this in a few episodes in Donna's season.
Speaking of Donna, her end was total BS, I think. I mean, Doctor 2 is human with a timelord consciousness, why isn't he dead? Or is he dead and the Doctor knew he would die but left him with Rose anyway? Why do we only see Donna going haywire at the end of the episode? If her mind was burning up from having everything the Doctor knows in her head, why didn't she burn up way earlier? Even so, why did the Doctor have to totally wipe her mind? He could have done what he did to Rose in S1, or he could have pulled a Frozen and left the personal growth but erased him from her memory. Even better, why not use the thing he used in S3 to turn himself human? Can't he make her timelord? Why not just lock up the parts of her mind that contain most of what he knows? I feel like RTD wrote her end this way so that Moffat wouldn't kill her off or something. And hell, it's not like they couldn't bring her back. I mean, ******** Moffat brought back the Timelords after it was well established by RTD that Gallifrey burned to a crisp.
On to Moffat, why did Amy have to see so many ******** psychiatrists? Having an imaginary friend isn't that bad. Also, why hell does Amy have to wait 5 or 6 episodes into her first season to get a real personality, only to still feel like a stiff character? Same with River. And if she's getting younger as the Doctor gets older, then wouldn't she still be alive, or did I miss something? At the end of season 7 part one, why can't the Doctor just travel forward a few years in time have have them meet him in New Jersey or something? That's should be far enough away from 1938 Manhattan, right? Better yet, why did Amy go with Rory when the Angels took him? There's no guarantee she'd be where he was. Better yet, after just dealing with a bunch of murderous statues, why turn away from the obvious weeping angel in the graveyard?
Even the Doctor has some really bad times. There were so many times when the Doctor could have been doing something, and he's just saying something funny while the camera closes up on his face.
So, WTF is wrong with some of the writers here? Which writer do you think ******** up the most? (I go with Moffat, but RTD had some really bad episodes as well.)