I have analyzed everything you've "carefully" written
That's the entire point. Everything can be explained over 40 times better than the way I explained everything I've said so far. If you were legit you'd want to hear it, but you don't. This makes the rest of your message from that point on invalid.
It's not that I'm wrong, and it has nothing to do with my opinions (Which I don't have). It has to do with my ability to communicate, and your ability to understand my communications.
You're not accidentally misunderstanding the context, you're 'deliberately' using whatever has the potential to be used out of context, out of context.
Think I didn't notice by now?
My context isn't wrong, just not well-enough communicated and established, otherwise you wouldn't be able to do this, if I didn't give you the opportunity, with my incompetent imperfect communications of the message.
You're not correcting me; I'm correcting you.
But why should I "correct" your mistakes when they're not mistakes, but instead, malicious intent. ?
I fully acknowledge your effort to prove your ad hominem argument. (Which is invalid by default, but also invalid because the substance of the argument is wrong, and not logical.)
The base/foundation of your argument is loose, unestablished, and unproven.
Jessica is ultimately not capable of doing this, and she wouldn't do this anyway. You're taking it too far, whoever you are.