Last Login: 10/26/2016 4:00 am
Ah okay, it makes sense since it's been a taboo for centuries so at this point we're pretty much hardwired to deter it. And it should remain that way since it's well documented to have negative effects on the bloodline.
PS TV was just weird and forgettable to me, though with it's price it is little weird that it didn't do good. Especially since people are known to skip the research so people probably didn't stay away from it knowing about the lackluster game support either. I guess people just took haters word on it and believed that Vita had no games.
That's the kind of s**t that really grinds my gears. It disgusts me how fast people are to start planning on getting rid of their old systems. If there's backwards compatibility, I can understand it even though I think BC is the devil and is ruining consoles. But as far as I know they didn't announce Nintendo Switch being backwards compatible with their competitors systems, so I can't even. I saw one post saying that if Switch gets Skyrim, they might get rid of their PS3 and I can understand that if Skyrim is the only reason they even have PS3 lying around, though what a waste of a PS3 though. However they didn't show any PS Vita's heavy hitters being announced and right now I wouldn't trust Nintendo and Treehouse with the stuff coming to Vita, so I have hard time seeing it surpass Vita as the new niche system. But who know, maybe they'll try to make it the mature "parents" console as they only had adults in the trailer and the "kids" stuff keeps coming out for Wii U, with exception of displayed Mario Kart and Splatoon since those are hardcore af and also appeals to the older demographic. Seriously though I don't read into it meaning anything that they didn't have kids in the trailer since [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsoyZmtS_nA&list=PLDFE84E483E4E7B07&index=3]it's not like it's the first time they're using the "gaming isn't just for kids" angle on ads.[/url] Some business insider who's leaked reliable information before has stated that Switch will be region-free though so that'd be great. Yeah, at this point there's nothing but specualation if it's old or new Splatoon. It hasn't really been Nintendo's tactic so far to push their new hardware with stuff that they're going to release on their previous system too, so I think whatever it is will be Switch exclusive. But that being said I think it would be some extreme BS if it's just the old Splatoon with extended support while the Wii U version is left behind. Oh yeah? I see you rising Spla2oon and I'll play Splatallion. That's right, we're past tiny little platoons. This is squid warfare, kids need not apply. Yeah, it would be really weird decision to showcase it if they weren't actually working on it, even if they understandably just wanted to show off that they have Bethesda on board with it despite not having anything real to show. With that price Remaster might not be a great deal for someone who already bought the collector's edition, PC Deluxe edition and Legendary edition for each of their home appliances, but it sickens me to see people trying to argue that it's not a $60 game and that being unreasonable price for only some hundreds of hours of best time of your life. I didn't b***h and moan that Nintendo should give me Wii U and Wind Waker HD for free because I already bought both of those on Gamecube, in fact, NOBODY DID. Nobody argued that Wind Waker wasn't a full price game or thought that they might've been bit of a tool for buying a whole new system for a ten year old game. If someone who hasn't played Skyrim before came to me and asked if it was worth the price, I'd tell them to send their wallet to Bethesda because they owe them at least another friggin hundred for it. *krhm* Rant over. I mean with every console generation there's new people coming in so is it impossible to think that maybe they're not re-releasing it for the old owners and just maybe Harry Potter movies weren't made for the
Posts per Day: 5.16
Total Posts: 17621