(Note to readers: The sentances next to a "-" are what chillzwithskillz sent to me, unedited)
(Note to readers: I hope if you can even read this you can figure this thing out...)
-Spelling of all things is the one thing you don't need.
+You didn't need to say "of all things" and "the one thing."
=What prof do you have that I don't? you can say it either way
-There are hundreds of languages to chose from.
+Irelevant! Your point?
= My point? you really have to ask? Okay form now on i will talk slow in your presence. You know everything there is to know about grammar then move and the knowledge means nothing. There are languages now that one won knows how to speak let allow put in the proper formate.
-Just but you can formate knowledge means nothing if you can't make the data in the first place.
+First of all, I think by "but" you meant "because," although I don't know how you got that... Second, I think this also doesn't actually have a relation.
=Well your thinking got you into this in the first place. All that means is spelling is not as important as you think.
-the smartest people in the world with in math and sciences (not just the standard one everyone thinks of).
+Capitalaize your "t" in "the." "with in" is not proper english at all. What standard one of what that everyone thinks of?
=Just about all people that are gifted at math have a problem with spelling.
-What separates us from the cave man is a slandered form of right.
+And how they might have looked (had they existed) and how they spoke and how they thought, etc. So many factors differed us, not just one. Are you sure your using the word "slandered" right? I don't think so...
= i would have to see the sentences around this one. Plus the ones that you listed don't even really matter depending on how far back the cave men your talking about are.
-In no way shape of from does that make us smarter just gives betters means to gain insight from more then just are own views.
+*Chuckles* That's a misconception of a common phrase, lololol. It is "in no way, shape, OR form" lol. Should be "smarter, it just" not "smarter just." It's "our" not "are." The end of that sentance had a bunch of gramatical errors I'm not even going to mention. On top of all that, I don't even understand the point you're trying to make...
=Point you can be the smartest person in the world and write like aj;thakjetha;ejtal;tjalktja;a;tja;
-Plus record and remember these findings.
+You give yourself too much credit by using the word findings. Read my first journal, thats 100x more worthy of being called a finding than this, and I still wouldn't call it a finding. Oh, and there should be a comma after "Plus."
=Pretty sure you didn't get what I was saying there.
-Though you think that spelling and grammar means so much it doesn't really have to deal with intelligence.
+Wow, only one (spelling and grammar) mistake. You used "means" which is singular as opposed to "mean" which is plural (Spelling AND Grammar). Kudos for spelling the commonoly spelled "grammar" right. A lack of spelling and grammer either points to unintelligence (there are rules so that people can understand what you are trying to say, not sounding like the terrible "Old English" of the middle ages) or it points to laziness (You don't have time to do it right), or it could easily be both.
=Spelling things right can mean your stupid. Actually people that spell things right have a high average of being slower or average.
-How can i say this?
+Easy, like this: "Though you think that spelling and grammar means so much it doesn't really have to deal with intelligence." You once again act like you are taking huge brave steps (something President Bush actually IS doing). Your defending laziness, and abuse of something that so many people smarter than you throughout history said was important. To say they are wrong is to say you are smarter than them.
I actually think you had me confused with someone else there; I'd never really had any discussion with you about the forums on your site before, and the service you described was something I hadn't even actually heard of.
But so long as the subject has been brought to the table. I don't think it directly violates the TOS, the way you described it; it's a bit of a gray area, though, and something you might want to tread carefully around. Gaia could lean one way or the other on the issue, since there's no real-money transaction involved, but I know they HAVE frowned on trading Gaia gold with other game currencies in the past.
You Talk, I listen... Maybe
View All Comments
Su madre es un vehículo.
Nice profile!
Consider the comment I just posted to be my revised opinion on the matter, then.
But so long as the subject has been brought to the table. I don't think it directly violates the TOS, the way you described it; it's a bit of a gray area, though, and something you might want to tread carefully around. Gaia could lean one way or the other on the issue, since there's no real-money transaction involved, but I know they HAVE frowned on trading Gaia gold with other game currencies in the past.