(Note to readers: The sentances next to a "-" are what chillzwithskillz sent to me, unedited)
(Note to readers: I hope if you can even read this you can figure this thing out...)
(AND ANOTHER Note: Ths iwill probably bore you, or you could site your opinion. Whatever)
-Spelling of all things is the one thing you don't need.
+You didn't need to say "of all things" and "the one thing."
=What prof do you have that I don't? you can say it either way
~It is redunant (you only need to say "Spelling is the one thing you don't need" or "Spelling of all things you don't need"). And to address your statement, which contains no proof (or prof), spelling is important. When Your speakin' l33t and stuff, sure its funny, I do that a lot. But when your trying to type intelligent sentances, its better to TRY. Just like a drug, you will get worse and worse, eventually leading to complete undeciferability (you yourself prove my point, lol).
-There are hundreds of languages to chose from.
+Irelevant! Your point?
= My point? you really have to ask? Okay form now on i will talk slow in your presence. You know everything there is to know about grammar then move and the knowledge means nothing. There are languages now that one won knows how to speak let allow put in the proper formate.
~WHAT THE HECK did you just say? Seriously, none of those last two statements were anything near a real sentance. I don't know what you are thinking, but you should re-read your senatnces before you post. "...then move and the knowledge means nothing..." "...one won knows how to speak..." and "...let allow put in the proper formate." You mean FORMAT? Yeah, you better actually speak good sentances.
-Just but you can formate knowledge means nothing if you can't make the data in the first place.
+First of all, I think by "but" you meant "because," although I don't know how you got that... Second, I think this also doesn't actually have a relation.
=Well your thinking got you into this in the first place. All that means is spelling is not as important as you think.
~I dunno what your trying to say STILL, but what it sounds like is something against your point. All that knowledge is useless if you CAN COMMUNICATE TO ANYONE AT ALL. I never said knowledge wasn't important. That has no relation, so don't illogically change the subject. You say spelling and individual sentances arn't very important, and I say they are.
-the smartest people in the world with in math and sciences (not just the standard one everyone thinks of).
+Capitalaize your "t" in "the." "with in" is not proper english at all. What standard one of what that everyone thinks of?
=Just about all people that are gifted at math have a problem with spelling.
~yeah... um... you need to give some proof. If they didn't know how to spell and make intelligable sentances, none of them would really be known about, because intelligent people usually have to do things like write stuff down and write letters.
-What separates us from the cave man is a slandered form of right.
+And how they might have looked (had they existed) and how they spoke and how they thought, etc. So many factors differed us, not just one. Are you sure your using the word "slandered" right? I don't think so...
= i would have to see the sentences around this one. Plus the ones that you listed don't even really matter depending on how far back the cave men your talking about are.
What "sentances" around this one? What are you talking about? Cave Men didn't exist. There's no proof of them in the fossil record, nor any other form of evolution whatsoever. It is a FACT. Yet human footprints and fingers are discovered in areas Humanists say are "Millions of years old." PROOF: http://www.gnmagazine.org/booklets/EV/fossilrecord.htm Anything your saying about cavemen is irrelivant.
-In no way shape of from does that make us smarter just gives betters means to gain insight from more then just are own views.
(Note to readers: The sentances next to a "-" are what chillzwithskillz sent to me, unedited)
-Spelling of all things is the one thing you don't need.
+You didn't need to say "of all things" and "the one thing."
-There are hundreds of languages to chose from.
+Irelevant! Your point?
-Just but you can formate knowledge means nothing if you can't make the data in the first place.
+First of all, I think by "but" you meant "because," although I don't know how you got that... Second, I think this also doesn't actually have a relation.
-the smartest people in the world with in math and sciences (not just the standard one everyone thinks of).
+Capitalaize your "t" in "the." "with in" is not proper english at all. What standard one of what that everyone thinks of?
-What separates us from the cave man is a slandered form of right.
+And how they might have looked (had they existed) and how they spoke and how they thought, etc. So many factors differed us, not just one. Are you sure your using the word "slandered" right? I don't think so...
-In no way shape of from does that make us smarter just gives betters means to gain insight from more then just are own views.
+*Chuckles* That's a misconception of a common phrase, lololol. It is "in no way, shape, OR form" lol. Should be "smarter, it just" not "smarter just." It's "our" not "are." The end of that sentance had a bunch of gramatical errors I'm not even going to mention. On top of all that, I don't even understand the point you're trying to make...
-Plus record and remember these findings.
+You give yourself too much credit by using the word findings. Read my first journal, thats 100x more worthy of being called a finding than this, and I still wouldn't call it a finding. Oh, and there should be a comma after "Plus."
-Though you think that spelling and grammar means so much it doesn't really have to deal with intelligence.
+Wow, only one (spelling and grammar) mistake. You used "means" which is singular as opposed to "mean" which is plural (Spelling AND Grammar). Kudos for spelling the commonoly spelled "grammar" right. A lack of spelling and grammer either points to unintelligence (there are rules so that people can understand what you are trying to say, not sounding like the terrible "Old English" of the middle ages) or it points to laziness (You don't have time to do it right), or it could easily be both.
-How can i say this?
+Easy, like this: "Though you think that spelling and grammar means so much it doesn't really have to deal with intelligence." You once again act like you are taking huge brave steps (something President Bush actually IS doing). Your defending laziness, and abuse of something that so many people smarter than you throughout history said was important. To say they are wrong is to say you are smarter than them.
-Well lets thing when people Say AFI they mean a program that can learn from it's mistakes and come up with solutions.
+I assume by "Thing" you mean "Think." Also, the term is AI because Artificial is one word. Also, it would probably use good grammar, and spelling, or at least try.
-NOT SPELL THINGS RIGHT WE HAVE THAT AND THEY DON"T CARE.
+I assume you mean "SPELLING." That's a Run-On sentance, two suntances put together without and feezable connector. And who are "They?" It's not something like love that you could say to robots "We have it and you don't care." They'd be like "Yeah, that's why were laughing."
-OWN PWN AND SCHOOLED.
+Acting again like you made a big accomplishment? Either OWN PWN AND SCHOOL or OWNED PWNED AND SCHOOLED. Plus "PWN" is just "PAWN" plus "OWN" so its reduntant.
So yeah, that was a pointless argument. Mabey try to prove something that actually makes sense next time. SCHOOLIN' AND FOOLIN' (Notice the apostrophies because the words are contractions?)
Oohhww okaiz I thought Nathan coz.. I dunno, sounds rigid and strutured and ... well.. Nathan! right right, um um letssee Daniel, but shortened to Danny?
and no to haily and rebecca and Morgan, man, those are bitchy names eww xD
Comments
View All Comments
-Achmed the Dead Terrorist.
You'd like it Here's the link
-Spelling of all things is the one thing you don't need.
+You didn't need to say "of all things" and "the one thing."
-There are hundreds of languages to chose from.
+Irelevant! Your point?
-Just but you can formate knowledge means nothing if you can't make the data in the first place.
+First of all, I think by "but" you meant "because," although I don't know how you got that... Second, I think this also doesn't actually have a relation.
-the smartest people in the world with in math and sciences (not just the standard one everyone thinks of).
+Capitalaize your "t" in "the." "with in" is not proper english at all. What standard one of what that everyone thinks of?
-What separates us from the cave man is a slandered form of right.
+And how they might have looked (had they existed) and how they spoke and how they thought, etc. So many factors differed us, not just one. Are you sure your using the word "slandered" right? I don't think so...
-In no way shape of from does that make us smarter just gives betters means to gain insight from more then just are own views.
+*Chuckles* That's a misconception of a common phrase, lololol. It is "in no way, shape, OR form" lol. Should be "smarter, it just" not "smarter just." It's "our" not "are." The end of that sentance had a bunch of gramatical errors I'm not even going to mention. On top of all that, I don't even understand the point you're trying to make...
-Plus record and remember these findings.
+You give yourself too much credit by using the word findings. Read my first journal, thats 100x more worthy of being called a finding than this, and I still wouldn't call it a finding. Oh, and there should be a comma after "Plus."
-Though you think that spelling and grammar means so much it doesn't really have to deal with intelligence.
+Wow, only one (spelling and grammar) mistake. You used "means" which is singular as opposed to "mean" which is plural (Spelling AND Grammar). Kudos for spelling the commonoly spelled "grammar" right. A lack of spelling and grammer either points to unintelligence (there are rules so that people can understand what you are trying to say, not sounding like the terrible "Old English" of the middle ages) or it points to laziness (You don't have time to do it right), or it could easily be both.
-How can i say this?
+Easy, like this: "Though you think that spelling and grammar means so much it doesn't really have to deal with intelligence." You once again act like you are taking huge brave steps (something President Bush actually IS doing). Your defending laziness, and abuse of something that so many people smarter than you throughout history said was important. To say they are wrong is to say you are smarter than them.
-Well lets thing when people Say AFI they mean a program that can learn from it's mistakes and come up with solutions.
+I assume by "Thing" you mean "Think." Also, the term is AI because Artificial is one word. Also, it would probably use good grammar, and spelling, or at least try.
-NOT SPELL THINGS RIGHT WE HAVE THAT AND THEY DON"T CARE.
+I assume you mean "SPELLING." That's a Run-On sentance, two suntances put together without and feezable connector. And who are "They?" It's not something like love that you could say to robots "We have it and you don't care." They'd be like "Yeah, that's why were laughing."
-OWN PWN AND SCHOOLED.
+Acting again like you made a big accomplishment? Either OWN PWN AND SCHOOL or OWNED PWNED AND SCHOOLED. Plus "PWN" is just "PAWN" plus "OWN" so its reduntant.
So yeah, that was a pointless argument. Mabey try to prove something that actually makes sense next time. SCHOOLIN' AND FOOLIN' (Notice the apostrophies because the words are contractions?)
and no to haily and rebecca and Morgan, man, those are bitchy names eww xD
I'd take a stab in the dark and say
............ Nathan
see, wasn't that hard~
Came up with that coz I'm going by intuition, you go by logic, its just interesting to see that's why I asked
booo
awwwwh well you lose =p