About

Check my LJ http://omnia-et-nihil.livejournal.com/
I'm a Sagittarius and a Dragon sign. I tend towards the dragon characteristics, all are very me. Magnificent, powerful, dominant, quick tempered, tactless (I prefer honest), vain, loves the spot light ect. but like the Sag I am an eternal optimist, a blinding ball of light and energy, spontaneous and adventure loving. Hand writing analysis says I light leading, and going my own way, and can be a loner, and may disregard rules.
I took some personality quizzes, here are the results
You’re a Shark. You've got a healthy love of life and a killer instinct. Chances are you hate rules, and don't plan on getting old. You're flexible and friendly on top of being innovative and smart. In short, people respect you.

You're extroverted and love being in the spotlight. Your mantra is "work hard, play hard" — you live life to the limit.


Extraversion |||||||||||||||||| 80%
Stability |||||||||||||||| 66%
Orderliness |||||||||||| 46%
Accommodation |||||||||||| 43%
Interdependence |||||||||||||||||| 76%
Intellectual |||||||||||||||||| 76%
Mystical |||||||||||||| 56%
Artistic |||||||||||||||||||| 83%
Religious |||||||||||| 50%
Hedonism || 10%
Materialism |||||||||||||||| 63%
Narcissism |||||||||||||||| 70%
Adventurousness |||||||||||||||||||| 83%
Work ethic |||||||||||||||| 70%
Self absorbed |||||||||||||||||||| 83%
Conflict seeking |||||||||||||||||| 76%
Need to dominate |||||||||||||||||||| 90%

Romantic |||||||||||||||||||| 83%
Avoidant |||||||||| 36%
Anti-authority |||||||||||||||| 70%
Wealth |||||| 23%
Dependency |||||||||||||||| 63%
Change averse |||||||||||| 43%
Cautiousness |||||||||||| 50%
Individuality |||||||||||||||| 63%
Sexuality || 10%
Peter pan complex |||||||||||||| 56%
Physical security |||||||||||||| 56%
Physical fitness |||||||||||||||| 70%
Histrionic |||||||||||||||| 70%
Paranoia |||| 16%
Vanity |||||||||||||||||||| 90%
Hypersensitivity |||||||||||| 50%
Female cliche |||||||||||||||||| 76%

Stability results were moderately high which suggests you are relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Orderliness results were medium which suggests you are moderately organized, hard working, and reliable while still remaining flexible, efficient, and fun.

Extraversion results were high which suggests you are overly talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting at the expense too often of developing your own individual interests and internally based identity.

trait snapshot:
social, outgoing, worry free, optimistic, upbeat, tough, likes large parties, makes friends easily, rarely irritated, open, enjoys leadership, trusting, dominant, thrill seeker, strong, does not like to be alone, assertive, mind over heart, confident, controlling, feels desirable, likes the spotlight, loves food, social chameleon, hard working, concerned about others

Altough I must say, I am extroverted, but my independence makes me content to a lone wolf on occasion

Friends

Viewing 12 of 76 friends

Multimedia

Comments

Viewing 10 of 20 comments.

Shadowfury33

Report | 03/16/2011 12:46 am

Shadowfury33

rufuss shinra?
Broken Nightmares

Report | 06/25/2010 1:48 am

Broken Nightmares

cool avi
iNaomi_Love

Report | 09/26/2009 11:39 am

iNaomi_Love

may i offer you 115k for enchanted book?
Gelenor the Blood Knight

Report | 04/23/2009 8:27 pm

Gelenor the Blood Knight

it is not something people are born with it is a choice that people make. if they were born with it then how would you explain some people being straight and liking girls to, being the opposite and liking guys? and vice versa has happened. also you should not get offend by what i was using as an example, it was merely that an example. also i am about to graduate high school, but i do not want to take something like that as a class that will try to warp my thinking into something other than what it is. i am not being intolerant i am merely arguing my opinion. and throwing a label on someone for having their own opinion is being intolerant. do you see me throwing a label on you? i could have said something like homo lover or something similar. tell me are all people that disagree with homosexuality considered homphobes? because that is the way you are making it seem. that what i have used as argument are some things that many people who don't agree with homosexuality use.
Gelenor the Blood Knight

Report | 04/23/2009 5:21 pm

Gelenor the Blood Knight

First of all do not quote what the bible says unless you provide a reference including the chapter and verse. anyone can quote the bible saying it says this or that. but that does not mean it is true unless you provide evidence to back it up. Also the part of the bible which you were quoting was in the old testament when it comes the marriage of different races. i can make the bible say whatever i want if i take parts of it out of context and that is what many churches and people who preach do. and on the matter of being a homophobe you apparently didn't read the information at link you posted very well. because its' exact definition of homophobe is this: "Homophobia is defined as fear, loathing and hatred of homosexuals and/or homosexuality." did i once say that i was scared or hated homosexuals? no i didn't so therefore you have no right to label me as such. and the way you labeled me like that just for feeling uncomfortable and not thinking it is natral is making it sound like that if i do not agree with you that i am a homophobe. so anything that i am uncomfortable with means i have a phobia of it? i am not conformable with getting hit by a car or tripping. does that mean i have a phobia of it? also tell me do you have a conscience? everybody does, and if you don't call it that you do have something inside of you that when you see certain things you know they are wrong. well that is the way i feel about homosexuality. just because something is accepted by some people does not mean it is ok. in world war 2 many german people accepted the holocaust or the inferiority of the jews and the fact that they needed to be cleansed. not all of them did but some of them did. should we condone the slaughter of innocents just because some people say it is ok? tell me that that the slaughter of innocent people doesn't somewhere inside make you uncomfortable. does that mean you have a phobia of people being slaughtered? so if everyone i know said it was ok for me to kill you family would that make it right? would that make it ok? no it wouldn't something like that is wrong no matter what. homosexuality is not something that was meant to happen. just because it has been around for a long time does not mean it is ok. women have been raped since almost as far back as sex goes. does that mean today i can go rape a women just because it happened in past and is happening now? 





do you know that most men who are homosexuals had bad or no relationship with their father, or they were molested or emotionally disturbed as a child? people are not born homosexual it is a choice they make. now i be you will ague that oh well what about in animals? they don't have the free will to make such a choice. well there are also called things such as mentally challenged people right? and some of them do things that no one else could possibly explain. some animals are the same way. and though they may not show any symptoms of it they could be suffing from a mental illness.





now please explain to me how homosexuality is a biological fact. just because something feels good physically does not mean it was meant to be like that. people have foot and hair fetishes and that makes them excited sexually and can cause them to have an orgasm. does that mean that that is a biological fact that hair and feet were meant to be part of sex? a woman's boobs were meant for breast feeding their children not for sex and yet people have turned it into a  tool for sex. does this mean it is a biological fact now? anything can be perverted into something other that what its it was originally mean for. take the scythe. it was used for harvesting grain a long time ago. now as soon as many people see it they make it synonymous with death. was that the syth's original purpose? no it was meant for harvesting grain. 





you make the argument that sex isn't just meant for reproduction, and you are right partially. though tell me this how many people would have sex if it was horribly painf
Gelenor the Blood Knight

Report | 04/22/2009 3:24 pm

Gelenor the Blood Knight

ok just because i am uncomfortable with the idea of homosexuality does not make me a homophobe. i means i have my own opinion and according to my beliefs it is wrong. two different races being together is completely different from the same sex being together. races were meant to mix like that. the whole idea behind it being taboo was because they were slaves and that is the only reason. since they were slaves and considered different because of that color of their skin it was looked on as wrong. If Men were meant to be with men and women with women then what would be the point in there being different sexes at all? the truth is that they were not made for. man was meant to be with women and women with man. that is why they have the sexual organs they have. people can claim whatever they want but tell me this. does biology lie? why does man have the p***s and girl the v****a? why not the both? it is because there is a special relationship between a man and a women that can't be replaced by having a partner of the same sex. do you realize that if everyone were homosexual that there would no longer be a human population because there would be no children. and if people think that homosexuality is ok with people then why frown upon it when it happens with animals? and yes i have been hit on by a guy. it was the most creepy and weried moment in my life. not because i am afraid of homosexuals because it was so unnatural, as it seemed wrong. and as social level it feels wrong. on a religous level it feels wrong and on every level imaginable it feels wrong. that is because it is not how our species the human race was meant to be.
Gelenor the Blood Knight

Report | 04/21/2009 2:05 pm

Gelenor the Blood Knight

sorry about that. but are u embarrassed about being in it? plus u can always delete my comments. no i didn't read the whole thing but i did read a good deal of it. though the main character being a homosexual wasn't something i really like or feel comfortable with. when you say that it was written more for girls you mean that girls find guy on guy attractive like most guys find girl on girl attractive?
Gelenor the Blood Knight

Report | 04/20/2009 8:00 pm

Gelenor the Blood Knight

ok allow me to rephrase that. i like your naga stories except for the homosexual parts. there that is better i sounded like i didn't really like them in the other comment. oh and you are very good at writing. i am a writer too. i am a member of the vore guild just like you.
Gelenor the Blood Knight

Report | 04/20/2009 7:58 pm

Gelenor the Blood Knight

hey i sort of liked the naga stories you wrote though i didn't like the parts of homosexuality in them. do you think you could write some that are heterosexual? that way you have stories that appeal to both types of people.
wolfy Valkinstin

Report | 03/20/2009 11:59 pm

wolfy Valkinstin

(Hey im not a bad wolfy) crying