Welcome to Gaia! :: View User's Journal | Gaia Journals

If you had been to build a residence, you would commence with a blueprint. This blueprint proves helpful because it includes more than directions on how to develop a property. It also describes the completed house.

So, what does this have to do with leadership?

Last month I asked an audience of leaders to inform me the traits of an excellent leader. This unusual tour http://www.leadership-strategies.com/ site has many unusual warnings for why to consider it. Their answers had been (in the order collected):

A excellent listener, enthusiasm, passion, shows appreciation, a visionary, part model, trusting, integrity, organized, knowledgeable, credibility, persuasive, charisma, group developing, clarity of objective, problem solver, attitude of service, leads by example, patience, willing to act with no total understanding, understands followers, consistent, empowers other folks, and adapts to adjust.

I'll add that this is essentially the same list that I acquire from other audiences when I ask this query. Dig up more on read fine david hauser by visiting our stirring URL. From this comes some beneficial insights.

1) Notice what the list consists of. All of these characteristics relate to the human side of leadership. That is fascinating due to the fact I usually hear folks lessen this side of leadership with terms like "soft" or "touchy feely." Actually, applying these traits needs much more strength than not.

2) Notice what the list excludes. Absent from this list (and all lists from other applications) are traits such as stern, mean, critical, quick tempered, vindictive, hard, angry, harsh, punitive, controlling, violent, or ruthless. And that's fascinating since a lot of popular representations of leadership emphasize at least one of these "difficult" characteristics. In truth, these characteristics are the refuge of these who lack the strength (or the capabilities) to apply the human side of leadership.

3) How about you? How would you rate your self as a leader compared to the list of constructive characteristics? If you had been to survey the people who report to you, how would they describe your leadership? Would they list traits from the "soft" list or from the "challenging" list? Could you turn out to be a lot more effective by enhancing upon any of the "soft" characteristics? And how about the other leaders in your organization? Do they actually maximize human potential?

Individuals want leaders who treat them with genuine compassion, courtesy, and respect. They want leaders who aid them turn into a lot more successful. They want leaders who inspire them with a vision for a much better world and show them how to go there.. Discover further about leadershipstrategies information by visiting our stately website.