|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 9:39 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 9:57 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 10:46 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 7:00 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:58 am
|
|
|
|
Well, since God has already been taken care of, I suppose I'll deal with Jesus' masculinity. One reason Jesus was a man would be to correspond with Adam.
In Romans 5:12-21, Paul contrasts Adam and Christ, saying, "Yes, Adam's one sin brought condemnation upon everyone, but Christ's one act of righteousness makes all people right in God's sight and gives them life. Because one person disobeyed God, many people became sinners. But because one other person obeyed God, many people will be made right in God's sight" (Romans 5:18-19). Adam was the man who brought on the burden of sin, and Jesus was the man to take it away.
Plus ... men are supposed to be the head of their household, with women and children in submission. Jesus couldn't have become a Rabbi and affected as many people if he were a woman because his sphere of influence would have been from his home. (Here's the debate about women in submission and such over in the Debate and Discussion forum: Biblical Womanhood and Manhood, Feminism, and the Family.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 12:34 pm
|
|
|
|
Gods Rosebud Well, since God has already been taken care of, I suppose I'll deal with Jesus' masculinity. One reason Jesus was a man would be to correspond with Adam.
In Romans 5:12-21, Paul contrasts Adam and Christ, saying, "Yes, Adam's one sin brought condemnation upon everyone, but Christ's one act of righteousness makes all people right in God's sight and gives them life. Because one person disobeyed God, many people became sinners. But because one other person obeyed God, many people will be made right in God's sight" (Romans 5:18-19). Adam was the man who brought on the burden of sin, and Jesus was the man to take it away.
Plus ... men are supposed to be the head of their household, with women and children in submission. Jesus couldn't have become a Rabbi and affected as many people if he were a woman because his sphere of influence would have been from his home. (Here's the debate about women in submission and such over in the Debate and Discussion forum: Biblical Womanhood and Manhood, Feminism, and the Family.) However in the Celtic socieities, women were the head of the household. They were revered and some were said to be descended from the Goddess and some were the High Priestesses. The Greeks also thought that women should be submissive and that men should be head of the household. Didn't make them right, now did it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|