I can see why you're siding with the "art has no standards" people.
Read Reply
Results for Major Malfunction's Post History
| Reply Results (465) | Replies | Forum | Topic Created | Reply Date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Art: What is it not? | 552 | Art Discussion |
5/23/09 5:09pm Invictus_88 |
|||
|
5/8/09 9:49pm Major Malfunction |
||||||
| Art: What is it not? | 552 | Art Discussion |
5/23/09 5:09pm Invictus_88 |
|||
|
You are completely missing the point.
I want you to explain to me why science is objective without resorting to tautologies like "science is objective because it studies objective things". You also need to do this without making the same arguments that Unchi made about art standards, because you have claimed those arguments are invalid and rude.
So far you have managed to copy Unchi's ar ...
Read Reply |
5/8/09 9:46pm Major Malfunction |
|||||
| Art: What is it not? | 552 | Art Discussion |
5/23/09 5:09pm Invictus_88 |
|||
|
So as Stop Him paraphrased, "it just is it just is!"
Read Reply |
5/8/09 9:19pm Major Malfunction |
|||||
| Art: What is it not? | 552 | Art Discussion |
5/23/09 5:09pm Invictus_88 |
|||
|
That science is objective is only your opinion.
Read Reply |
5/8/09 8:41pm Major Malfunction |
|||||
| Art: What is it not? | 552 | Art Discussion |
5/23/09 5:09pm Invictus_88 |
|||
|
How do you know this? Don't cite an authority because all "authorities" are just older opinions, according to Stop Him.
Read Reply |
5/8/09 8:32pm Major Malfunction |
|||||
| Art: What is it not? | 552 | Art Discussion |
5/23/09 5:09pm Invictus_88 |
|||
|
Is that cross heavy?
Read Reply |
5/8/09 8:05pm Major Malfunction |
|||||
| Art: What is it not? | 552 | Art Discussion |
5/23/09 5:09pm Invictus_88 |
|||
|
Can you tell me something that you would consider a "fact"? As far as I can tell, you have claimed that the entirety of human knowledge is merely opinion and there are no actually authorities on any subject. Even Foucault would laugh at this.
Read Reply |
5/8/09 8:03pm Major Malfunction |
|||||
| Art: What is it not? | 552 | Art Discussion |
5/23/09 5:09pm Invictus_88 |
|||
|
Just because you do something all the time doesn't make you adept at it.
Of course, this is assuming that words have meanings and obviously that's only my opinion.
Read Reply |
5/8/09 7:50pm Major Malfunction |
|||||
| Art: What is it not? | 552 | Art Discussion |
5/23/09 5:09pm Invictus_88 |
|||
|
I guess it's true that irony is dead.
Read Reply |
5/8/09 7:44pm Major Malfunction |
|||||
| Art: What is it not? | 552 | Art Discussion |
5/23/09 5:09pm Invictus_88 |
|||
|
Well, now that you've successfully argued against the very existence of human knowledge, I think we're done here.
Read Reply |
5/8/09 7:32pm Major Malfunction |
|||||
| Art: What is it not? | 552 | Art Discussion |
5/23/09 5:09pm Invictus_88 |
|||
|
Saying "any kind of media can be used to create art" is not the same as saying "anything can be art". The fact that Duchamp made a piece of art out of a bicycle wheel does not mean that bicycle wheels are art; the fact that Picasso made art using oil paints doesn't mean that everything made with oil paints is art. You seemed to be suggesting otherwise in your previous posts.
Read Reply |
5/8/09 11:01am Major Malfunction |
|||||
| Art: What is it not? | 552 | Art Discussion |
5/23/09 5:09pm Invictus_88 |
|||
|
But you just said that everything and anything can be art. Doesn't that mean that your field of study now includes all material objects on Earth? This seems like one hell of a degree plan.
Read Reply |
5/8/09 10:49am Major Malfunction |
|||||
| Art: What is it not? | 552 | Art Discussion |
5/23/09 5:09pm Invictus_88 |
|||
|
Respect for Blizzard decreasing faster than I thought possible.
Also, reporting you for sockpuppetry.
Read Reply |
5/8/09 10:48am Major Malfunction |
|||||
| Art: What is it not? | 552 | Art Discussion |
5/23/09 5:09pm Invictus_88 |
|||
|
You have no idea how happy I am that you are going to stop posting, if only for eight hours.
Read Reply |
5/8/09 10:47am Major Malfunction |
|||||
| Art: What is it not? | 552 | Art Discussion |
5/23/09 5:09pm Invictus_88 |
|||
|
No, because cooties.
I'm kind of confused, though. If you think everything can be and is "art", then why are you a fine arts major? Doesn't that opinion sort of defeat the purpose of that field of study?
Read Reply |
5/8/09 10:34am Major Malfunction |
|||||
|
|
||||||
Created by
Invictus_88
Created by
Major Malfunction