Welcome to Gaia! :: Hello+Rider+the+Hitkitten's Post History

I see n****e! That might not be allowed due to content, because the rules are really lame and uptight >_> anyway, the 500x500 rule is for signatures, and intended to limit the bother other people's signatures have on browsing the forums. it's not a rule for picture posting in general, and there is no such explicitly defined rule for profiles
Read Reply

if you weren't so technologically inept, you would realize that what I said IS relevant, because if you were to use a different method of player, other users would be less able to steal the URL, thereby solving the problem
Read Reply

yeah, whatever, i've been here longer than you, I know the rules. Don't play rent-a-mod, okay kid? It's just as counter-productive, if not more so. Just drop it and get over it. also, read my post, I edited more stuff in :roll: also, don't address issues you don't understand: the mp3 doesn't work for me and other people with my configuration because she has done not it properly. you can' ...
Read Reply

How is that possible? You can't just stick an mp3 file in the multimedia URL anyway (or, I don't know what configuration allows you to. that's not supposed to work) Use a player that loads the mp3 on the fly from a remote source anyway, do you have cpanel on your server? find its hotlink protection option, and limit access to those with your profile as the referrer
Read Reply

:gonk:
Read Reply

:gonk:
Read Reply

probably true.....but you never know what info the users might be able to provide sometimes they surprise me...though mostly they annoy me :XD
Read Reply

:3nod: maybe it's unclear since that's a little hard to explain, although I tried my best :xp: (or the GAC for that matter, it would be easy to rip them out of the flash file....disregarding the fact that it's long since dead and the creator probably wouldn't take action)
Read Reply

no, it's not the same thing at all. the first thread was asking whether advertisements were profiting from gaia content, and whether that was allowed this thread is asking whether images that are derivative works of gaia images, with esentially no redeeming creative or artistic value, are subject to the same terms as full avatar images (i.e. the admins allow you to use them off site for var ...
Read Reply

I wouldn't, sai, I like you. I was rather sad that users were allowed to sell the created images. I'm on your side ;) I'm wondering, just hypothetically, what the ruling would be :xp:
Read Reply

fell-off-the-front-page-bump
Read Reply

I'm not interested in opinions on what's pointless, or really anything whatsoever except answers to the question posed, as this forum is not for such discussions, but for giving answers to questions posed (about gaia) there was already the gavsim when tektek created his tool. he didn't seem to think it was pointless. He created it because of Saikatsu's watermarks, and explicitly advertised ...
Read Reply

not in the slightest. Read the first post again I already went where I was going and appearantly this topic is done
Read Reply

(My previous topic brought this to mind. I did not intend for these to go together, nor am I targeting anyone, it just came into my head given the previous topic....you know how weird the brain is like that :xp:) To make an "avatar creator", you must cut up gaia's images into individual items and layer them together. If I were able to get ahold of these images out of someone else's avatar creat ...
Read Reply

if you are a mule of a person on my ignore list as your post would seem to hint, you can be reported for harassment for circumventing my ignore list with a mule. I recently learned that the hard way :rofl: I know it's not a counter of visitors. in fact, that fact works AGAINST you, because, the most popular feature being the "dream creator", that is what would use the most bandwidth and get ...
Read Reply