Brodie Asturias
- Quote
- Report Post
- Posted: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:24:22 +0000
I can usually come up with a title with a snap of my fingers right about the time I'm trying to name the document, and that's it. I like it and I stick with it. I've got a lot of examples of doing precisely that. Even my earliest stories, while the titles may not be astounding, are satisfactory and I wouldn't like to change.
For example, my first story ever was about two boys called Taiju and Mackie. I called the first part of the series Taiju and Mackie: Journey to Metsvar, the second part Taiju and Mackie: The City of Despair and the third part Taiju and Mackie: Spire of the Sun. It's simple, relative to what occurs in the story, somewhat childish, but I like it.
My second story ever has the same naming system. It was about a group of people who followed a certain religion based around twin gods. As such, it's two parts have the names Twin Gods: Rise to Power and Twin Gods: One Thousand Lives. Once again, they're simple, relative to the events in the stories, and I am entirely happy with them.
The stories in another series of mine are also simply labelled. They are Tobias Smith and the Archivist of Reality and The Black Dog of Daniel O'Halloran. The first is named in the same manner as the Harry Potter series, but I mixed it up a bit with the second one because Daniel O'Halloran and the Black Dog sounds kind of lame. Again, simple, relative and I'm happy with it.
A different story and personal favourite of mine is called Mercury. It's about a boy who thinks he has leukaemia but is actually suffering deliberate mercury poisoning. Simple and relative, I'm happy.
What I'm getting at is you can title your story right at the very beginning and it doesn't just have to be a label, because even right at the very beginning you have an idea about where you're going to go with the story. The thing about titles is that they do not have to be symbolic or obscure. You don't always have to put great deal of thought or time into them, because they don't matter that much. They just have to represent your story to a sufficient extent that it makes sense when someone reads it, and not sound too boring while going about it.
For example, my first story ever was about two boys called Taiju and Mackie. I called the first part of the series Taiju and Mackie: Journey to Metsvar, the second part Taiju and Mackie: The City of Despair and the third part Taiju and Mackie: Spire of the Sun. It's simple, relative to what occurs in the story, somewhat childish, but I like it.
My second story ever has the same naming system. It was about a group of people who followed a certain religion based around twin gods. As such, it's two parts have the names Twin Gods: Rise to Power and Twin Gods: One Thousand Lives. Once again, they're simple, relative to the events in the stories, and I am entirely happy with them.
The stories in another series of mine are also simply labelled. They are Tobias Smith and the Archivist of Reality and The Black Dog of Daniel O'Halloran. The first is named in the same manner as the Harry Potter series, but I mixed it up a bit with the second one because Daniel O'Halloran and the Black Dog sounds kind of lame. Again, simple, relative and I'm happy with it.
A different story and personal favourite of mine is called Mercury. It's about a boy who thinks he has leukaemia but is actually suffering deliberate mercury poisoning. Simple and relative, I'm happy.
What I'm getting at is you can title your story right at the very beginning and it doesn't just have to be a label, because even right at the very beginning you have an idea about where you're going to go with the story. The thing about titles is that they do not have to be symbolic or obscure. You don't always have to put great deal of thought or time into them, because they don't matter that much. They just have to represent your story to a sufficient extent that it makes sense when someone reads it, and not sound too boring while going about it.