Master of disaster20
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 03:27:20 +0000
FPSFrame52
Master of disaster20
FPSFrame52
Master of disaster20
FPSFrame52
Master of disaster20
Still would say that a different one would probably be better, due to his health care plan. Besides, they say he barely does anything with the military, even though he's suppose to be head chief of the military itself. (Of course it's every presidents duty, which is taking most of command of the military.) Which I did not see much was wrong with Bush, but of course my dad never had such trouble before then either, up until having Obama. But yet, the healthcare plan was messing up my mother, so is our tax income being horrible, and much more company rip offs have been happening to us. Which most of the dilemma happening around my country I believe is because of Obama.
I'm actually a bit glad he's not messing too much with the military. If anything he should let the generals do their job. Bush got too involved and he's the reason we're wrapped up in Middle Eastern affairs far too much.
As for company rip-offs, those aren't the president's fault. He doesn't control private corporations and can't dictate what they can or cannot do. The taxes are pretty heavy, but if he doesn't tax people then the government will continue slipping into debt. The only way out is to tax, tax, tax, and stimulate the economy. Things will get worse, but I'm confident they will also get better soon.
Well pretty much all I have to say is, why not tax other places that has more money than others? It's like take more money from the poor, than from the rich. Which literally, I do think it's beginning to come that way. It's like they think we're made out of money, but we're not. Which I still think it's one of his laws fault for companies, for laws still affect a lot, even private company. Still though, why call it private anyways? It belongs to the government in the long shot.
Obama's actually for taxing the rich. The GOP candidates are all anti-rich taxation (except maybe Ron Paul and Gingrich - both of whom will not get the nomination) so replacing Obama won't really do much for that. Also, the Congress controls tax laws, Obama merely signs them into play. He can't force Congress to tax the rich, but he can make his voice heard, which he has.
Private companies - far from belonging to the government - actually have strong power in the government. They sponsor the campaigns of many candidates, and Obama cannot hope to oppose them without losing their support and possibly losing his campaign. Also, Congress once again controls laws, and they're not about to jeopardize their main cash cow, the corporations. Obama is strongly against Corporate control over the consumer, which is why he's passing laws to ensure jobs overseas come back here, but he can only do so much.
Well there's too much greedy people in the congress then, which I just wonder how they even put some of the people in there who's been doing all this. Besides, even though Franklin Roosevelt put us in debt before, doesn't mean that Congress should put money before a person's life, and tax poor people more than rich.
Still, don't see why people voted for Romney anyways, it seemed like a horrible idea in the first place. They should of went with those two guys instead, which whom I say and knew to be one of the perfect choices for this position.
Gringrich caught a lot of flak for cheating on his wife, which I personally think is unwarranted (cheating does not equal "terrible president" - look at Clinton, he was a powerhouse Democrat who got us EARNING money rather than being in debt). Paul is too eccentric for a conservative - he's actually quite liberal, except that he can't run unless he's on GOP's side since Obama is the democrat candidate.
Romney got the vote from the GOP supporters because he's most like the "traditional" conservatives - a rich, white man who appreciates and wants to maintain the current status-quo.
I was really mostly for Gingrich at first really, because he looked like he know what he was doing, but apparently everyone just mostly is too stupid to realize it. Paul still seems ok besides of being too eccentric, which seems like his only downfall which is mostly described that I've seen from you.