chainmailleman
low iq 111
chainmailleman
low iq 111
i'm specifically looking for a valid source that supports your argument that the federal reserves loans money at interest to the government.... because i quick google search led me to someone saying that that idea is conspiracy theory nonsense.... i really don't care for every single action the federal reserve makes.
if the federal reserve loans money
to anyone at interest that would be unfair unless somehow it "gave away" or created more money to compensate. but at the same time couldn't someone pay the federal reserve back with gold or ____ objects? i'm not sure but if so there is another way in which to pay the fed. reserve back fairly.
I linked more than enough information from "Valid" sources in my previous post. I recommend reading the constitution, who is supposed to print our money specifically, then read the federal reserve act. It's all there, and I guarantee it's conspiracy by definition (2 or more people plotting against another).
Aliens are "conspiracy theory". Money is documented fact.
valid? a youtube video is valid? hah. no that is not how you cite. when you cite something in the real world you bring the information to the person. for example you would need to cite page numbers instead of a book. you need to cite where on the webpage you found the information not just a long drawn out webpage. you need to cite the time on the video....and so on. so you can either convince me or not.... i don't know why you are not trying harder if these issues matter to you so much. you should be trying to be more convincing but you don't even vote so i guess these issues are really not that important to you....
You would never survive in a library with the fiction labels removed. The Lord of the Rings would be your history book for how well your research and logic skills are.
I cited more than a youtube video, but apparently thats too much for you....whom hasn't cited s**t, just knocking on me for doing what you asked.....
I'm not convincing anyone. I'm doing what everyone else here is, posting their opinion, backed by website/video/whatever as a source. A source is only as good as the person observing the source. The bible is a source, and it's not.
Which brings me to perception. Since voting is perceived to be "your voice" the argument now has completed it's cycle and repeating is inevitable.
Voting is a ritual to solidify your belief that you actually have a say in something.
you're the only person being insulting. i'm simply asking for you to prove your opinions. you are not very smart and overly aggressive on top of that! good god.
i don't want to sift through a 30 minute video or pages on the internet....who would? that's not even how to properly cite so .....i'm still waiting.
i didn't make any claims so therefore i don't need to cite anything...
"I'm not convincing anyone. "
then obviously this is not as important to you as you think. you are just some bitter guy who refuses to do any real work and you are not any better than anyone else. your life will be a failure if you never change.
i don't think voting is the only thing someone can do.... i think there are much better ways to get involved, actually but it is something. you don't even want to try and be convincing on the internet, so why should i listen to you when you say 'voting doesn't work'?