Double check who yo vote for ...

[castigat ridendo mores]

Honeydew Pudding

Maybe if the presidents want to move forward, they should discontinue this two party system.

Now we ask ourselves the likelihood of that happening.

[high past]

castigat ridendo mores

Honeydew Pudding

Maybe if the presidents want to move forward, they should discontinue this two party system.

Now we ask ourselves the likelihood of that happening.

Zero. Because there is no such thing as "uncorrupted."

[castigat ridendo mores]

Honeydew Pudding

castigat ridendo mores

Honeydew Pudding

Maybe if the presidents want to move forward, they should discontinue this two party system.

Now we ask ourselves the likelihood of that happening.

Zero. Because there is no such thing as "uncorrupted."

Damn.
My hopes have been dashed.

[DontMessWithTexas86]

Mabs Kiss

Romney is trying to press RELIGIOUS views onto America. America was founded upon the right to have freedom of religion, so, he can't really force things like gay marriage or abortion to be illegal because of some religion view. Not everyone in America is the same religion so it's completely idiotic that someone would do something like that.

Gay marriage was illegal to begin with when this country started

[Mabs Kiss]

VampireCountess

Mabs Kiss

Romney is trying to press RELIGIOUS views onto America. America was founded upon the right to have freedom of religion, so, he can't really force things like gay marriage or abortion to be illegal because of some religion view. Not everyone in America is the same religion so it's completely idiotic that someone would do something like that.

Gay marriage was illegal to begin with when this country started

Because of religion, and it wasn't because America already had a civilization( Indians) and they were okay with other gay Indians. And a bunch of other countries started out hating gays but that is all because of religion. They are talking about peace but if you're not gonna give someone rights how is that peaceful ?

[StandYoGround]

castigat ridendo mores

Honeydew Pudding

Maybe if the presidents want to move forward, they should discontinue this two party system.

Now we ask ourselves the likelihood of that happening.

All we need is 5% for the Libertarian party this election and it will open eyes of the American people. There is a chance, we just have to push for it. Like the Tea-Party people pushed for their candidates and held rallies, we need to band together and remind the goverment that this country is ran by WE the people and not corporations and pure unrestrained coruption.

[castigat ridendo mores]

StandYoGround

castigat ridendo mores

Honeydew Pudding

Maybe if the presidents want to move forward, they should discontinue this two party system.

Now we ask ourselves the likelihood of that happening.

All we need is 5% for the Libertarian party this election and it will open eyes of the American people. There is a chance, we just have to push for it. Like the Tea-Party people pushed for their candidates and held rallies, we need to band together and remind the goverment that this country is ran by WE the people and not corporations and pure unrestrained coruption.

And if/when he loses, and people blame him for the loss of the losing party?
Will this put him in a good light in 2016?

[StandYoGround]

castigat ridendo mores

StandYoGround

castigat ridendo mores

Honeydew Pudding

Maybe if the presidents want to move forward, they should discontinue this two party system.

Now we ask ourselves the likelihood of that happening.

All we need is 5% for the Libertarian party this election and it will open eyes of the American people. There is a chance, we just have to push for it. Like the Tea-Party people pushed for their candidates and held rallies, we need to band together and remind the goverment that this country is ran by WE the people and not corporations and pure unrestrained coruption.

And if/when he loses, and people blame him for the loss of the losing party?
Will this put him in a good light in 2016?

That idea transfers back to Ross Perou(sp?) who ran as a third party candidate during George Bush V Bill Clinton. People blamed Ross for turning votes away from the republican party which lead to Bush not having a second term in office. The second demostration of the third party candidates was blamed on Pat Buchanan as the reason to why George W. Bush won (Remember we had to have a voter recount in Florida because of it). Now is a different time and you hear more and more people educating themselves on the issues that are out there and complaining of how tired they are of picking from the lesser of two evils. If we do shine light on the possibility of breaking away from the bi-partisan system people will pay attention and it will have a postive scope. Not to say negative things will come with it, playing politics always plays off negativly.

[castigat ridendo mores]

StandYoGround

castigat ridendo mores

StandYoGround

castigat ridendo mores

Honeydew Pudding

Maybe if the presidents want to move forward, they should discontinue this two party system.

Now we ask ourselves the likelihood of that happening.

All we need is 5% for the Libertarian party this election and it will open eyes of the American people. There is a chance, we just have to push for it. Like the Tea-Party people pushed for their candidates and held rallies, we need to band together and remind the goverment that this country is ran by WE the people and not corporations and pure unrestrained coruption.

And if/when he loses, and people blame him for the loss of the losing party?
Will this put him in a good light in 2016?

That idea transfers back to Ross Perou(sp?) who ran as a third party candidate during George Bush V Bill Clinton. People blamed Ross for turning votes away from the republican party which lead to Bush not having a second term in office. The second demostration of the third party candidates was blamed on Pat Buchanan as the reason to why George W. Bush won (Remember we had to have a voter recount in Florida because of it). Now is a different time and you hear more and more people educating themselves on the issues that are out there and complaining of how tired they are of picking from the lesser of two evils. If we do shine light on the possibility of breaking away from the bi-partisan system people will pay attention and it will have a postive scope. Not to say negative things will come with it, playing politics always plays off negativly.

I understand why people pick the easy way out.
For me to make an educated vote - either Johnson or Obama, I'm on a middleground - I have to delve deeper and deeper every day into complexities.
Uggh.
Keep going, keep going...

[StandYoGround]

castigat ridendo mores

StandYoGround

castigat ridendo mores

StandYoGround

castigat ridendo mores

Honeydew Pudding

Maybe if the presidents want to move forward, they should discontinue this two party system.

Now we ask ourselves the likelihood of that happening.

All we need is 5% for the Libertarian party this election and it will open eyes of the American people. There is a chance, we just have to push for it. Like the Tea-Party people pushed for their candidates and held rallies, we need to band together and remind the goverment that this country is ran by WE the people and not corporations and pure unrestrained coruption.

And if/when he loses, and people blame him for the loss of the losing party?
Will this put him in a good light in 2016?

That idea transfers back to Ross Perou(sp?) who ran as a third party candidate during George Bush V Bill Clinton. People blamed Ross for turning votes away from the republican party which lead to Bush not having a second term in office. The second demostration of the third party candidates was blamed on Pat Buchanan as the reason to why George W. Bush won (Remember we had to have a voter recount in Florida because of it). Now is a different time and you hear more and more people educating themselves on the issues that are out there and complaining of how tired they are of picking from the lesser of two evils. If we do shine light on the possibility of breaking away from the bi-partisan system people will pay attention and it will have a postive scope. Not to say negative things will come with it, playing politics always plays off negativly.

I understand why people pick the easy way out.
For me to make an educated vote - either Johnson or Obama, I'm on a middleground - I have to delve deeper and deeper every day into complexities.
Uggh.
Keep going, keep going...

I've taken the knowledge that I've gained. People kept calling Obama a socialist, so I started looking up things on econonmy and the different types and ideas and how they work. So on and so forth and I apply that knowledge by holding myself outside of the specturm. Not really something that appeals just to me, but the mind set.

[devilpoop666]

Obama letting the NDAA past just made your freedoms go away. Yet people still love obama. WOW

[EanJan]

castigat ridendo mores

You really think the general public gives a s**t where this country goes? lol

Actually, you'll be surprise of how many do. People on the internet just get the short end of the stick seeing all the peeps who don't care.

[Old Blue Collar Joe]

Mabs Kiss

A lot of people vote for their PERSONAL preference. I, for one, think you should vote for who would make America better as a WHOLE.

Romney is trying to press RELIGIOUS views onto America. America was founded upon the right to have freedom of religion, so, he can't really force things like gay marriage or abortion to be illegal because of some religion view. Not everyone in America is the same religion so it's completely idiotic that someone would do something like that.

Obama, however, is not forcing religious rights on everyone. If yo don't agree with something you don't have to follow it. ( Ex. Don't go to a gay wedding if you're homphobic. You don't have to get an abortion if you don't want one. ) and he has Obamacare which is just like ... BRO IT'S FOR THE POOR.

Romney is saying he will attack Iraq if they don't " disarm the nuclear ' stuff '" . WHY ?! America attacked them because of 9/11 but now he WANTS TO GO IN AND DO WHAT THEY DID WHEN HE HAS NO PROOF THAT THEY ACTUALLY HAVE IT. Hasn't this happened before ? ( rhetorical )

I want you to double think about your voting and how it would effect America as a WHOLE.

Got any actual, you know, facts?
Obama nor Romney will push on the gay marriage issue. It's a political football, and neither are willing to touch it.
Romney hasn't made nor threatened any attacks on abortion, other than stating it is a state's right issue, not a federal one.
And you really have no clue what Obamacare is, do you? THE POOR ALREADY HAVE tax payer funded health care.