It's an okay book. I liked it because it was easy to read, breezed right through all three in a week, and the characters are well-defined between themselves. The plot wasn't particularly new--anyone seen Battle Royale? The second book plot was disappointing because even though it was a different dynamic of the Hunger Games, it was still the same arena-play, and I didn't feel like I got anything extra until Katniss finally decided to face her fate as a figure for the revolution. As a heroine, I think Katniss is believable and sympathetic, readers probably identify with her very well because she goes from not having an opinion to being personally impacted by the totalitarian state of Panem. I thought Collins could be a bit more original in the monsters, tracker jackers that are basically wasps, vicious hell hounds (although I liked that the dogs had competitors' faces), and jabberjays, which are evil mockingbirds, monkey mutts, and rose reptiles are pretty names but to a hardcore fantasy/scifi reader, they seem childish and not very impressive. What I enjoyed the best was the setting of having 13 districts (the last unknown until the second book) with a dystopian attitude toward war, and Collins' comprehensive writing style. It was a good read, but not the best.
The movie was a great movie cinematically, but took liberties with the original plot to be so. I missed the Governor's daughter Madge, and the frivolous design team. I loved how they made up for it by showing the gamemaster's PoV--that was a wicked smart move, and I loled in the theatre and couldn't stop talking about it for days. For the first time in my life, I can say the movie and the original book tied. (If LoTR wasn't so darn long, I could say Fellowship was my first, but here's hoping for The Hobbit *crosses fingers*)