Eccentric Iconoclast
(?)Community Member
- Posted: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 03:43:48 +0000
THIS IS NOT MEANT TO BASH YOU OR YOUR BELIEFS. IT IS SIMPLY TO POINT OUT THE FOLLY IN SAYING THAT ONE'S MORALS ARE OBJECTIVE.
My main issue with religion is its subjectivity.
There is no objective 'right' and 'wrong'. Such things are human views, created by humans. There is only what is, and what isn't, and there's a whole ton of exceptions to those rules as well...
'Right' and 'wrong' are core values in most all major religions, and they seem so ridiculously silly to me...
It's not to say that I am not a moral person. However, I see these morals as purely subjective, and not some objective dictation by a higher power.
I see such things as being beneficial or not beneficial, with many exceptions.
Yes, I know my post is short. But I do think I got my point across, and I will elaborate some of the things I've said when it is necessary to do so.
Edit: Many of the responses in this thread seem to say that I dislike subjectivity. I do not. It has proven itself to be a necessary part of human nature.
My main issue with religion is its subjectivity.
There is no objective 'right' and 'wrong'. Such things are human views, created by humans. There is only what is, and what isn't, and there's a whole ton of exceptions to those rules as well...
'Right' and 'wrong' are core values in most all major religions, and they seem so ridiculously silly to me...
It's not to say that I am not a moral person. However, I see these morals as purely subjective, and not some objective dictation by a higher power.
I see such things as being beneficial or not beneficial, with many exceptions.
Yes, I know my post is short. But I do think I got my point across, and I will elaborate some of the things I've said when it is necessary to do so.
Edit: Many of the responses in this thread seem to say that I dislike subjectivity. I do not. It has proven itself to be a necessary part of human nature.