Welcome to Gaia! ::

Millefune
Fox2102
Yeah you do a little under hood work to that 5.0 and that thing will fly. I mean hell you can strip them down to the frame pretty much.

You do even less work under the hood to an LS or HEMI engined car, and it will fly even more. I mean Hell, you can strip anything down to the frame pretty much.

Its all in the way you look at it, you are comparing a semi-modern carbureted/injected car with a 5.0 L sized engine with 225 hp stock vs a modern 5.7 L runnin a healthy 300-350 hp. I also own an 89 Mustang, Ive done quite a bit to it just below the point of aluminum heads or forced induction, Im guessing an honest 240-250 hp (never dynoed). Ive walked with newer Z28s and Trans Ams and held back. If I had had a hot 351 or a stroker equivalent to an LS engine, of course I woulda stood on it. At the time I just didnt really wanna read the guy's rear plate
Gundam Ace
Millefune
Fox2102
Yeah you do a little under hood work to that 5.0 and that thing will fly. I mean hell you can strip them down to the frame pretty much.

You do even less work under the hood to an LS or HEMI engined car, and it will fly even more. I mean Hell, you can strip anything down to the frame pretty much.

Its all in the way you look at it, you are comparing a semi-modern carbureted/injected car with a 5.0 L sized engine with 225 hp stock vs a modern 5.7 L runnin a healthy 300-350 hp. I also own an 89 Mustang, Ive done quite a bit to it just below the point of aluminum heads or forced induction, Im guessing an honest 240-250 hp (never dynoed). Ive walked with newer Z28s and Trans Ams and held back. If I had had a hot 351 or a stroker equivalent to an LS engine, of course I woulda stood on it. At the time I just didnt really wanna read the guy's rear plate


You've done quite a bit to it, and still only push 240-250?

That's not right. A new set of pistons and headers have shown dyno results of 80+ bhp in a windsor 5.0.

Hell, even from stock, a new intake and carb, with a proper tune should net you more than 240bhp. s**t, I've seen carb spacer plates that added 12bhp/8ft-lbs on an SBC, and with the windsor being as stock-restrictive as it is, you should get comparable gains.

Methinks you've got something wrong there. Did you drop the A/C? Accessories are power leeches.
240 bhp for a 5.0 liter?

...
..
.
AHAAHABAHAHHHH
Twistex
Gundam Ace
Millefune
Fox2102
Yeah you do a little under hood work to that 5.0 and that thing will fly. I mean hell you can strip them down to the frame pretty much.

You do even less work under the hood to an LS or HEMI engined car, and it will fly even more. I mean Hell, you can strip anything down to the frame pretty much.

Its all in the way you look at it, you are comparing a semi-modern carbureted/injected car with a 5.0 L sized engine with 225 hp stock vs a modern 5.7 L runnin a healthy 300-350 hp. I also own an 89 Mustang, Ive done quite a bit to it just below the point of aluminum heads or forced induction, Im guessing an honest 240-250 hp (never dynoed). Ive walked with newer Z28s and Trans Ams and held back. If I had had a hot 351 or a stroker equivalent to an LS engine, of course I woulda stood on it. At the time I just didnt really wanna read the guy's rear plate


You've done quite a bit to it, and still only push 240-250?

That's not right. A new set of pistons and headers have shown dyno results of 80+ bhp in a windsor 5.0.

Hell, even from stock, a new intake and carb, with a proper tune should net you more than 240bhp. s**t, I've seen carb spacer plates that added 12bhp/8ft-lbs on an SBC, and with the windsor being as stock-restrictive as it is, you should get comparable gains.

Methinks you've got something wrong there. Did you drop the A/C? Accessories are power leeches.

I know they are leeches, ive dropped the AIR pump but have everything else, the things you are saying are true, however i do not have new pistons, i know it would help. My car is fuel injected, and fuel injected 5.0 engines came stock with 225 hp, cherry and tuned. But, most stock, worn in fuel injected 5.0s nowadays push 190 average with stock equipment, starting from there you can see how 250 would be a noticeable improvement. I dont know why, but fuel injected 5.0/5.8 engines are alot harder to squeeze the numbers out than carbureted engines. A friend of mine has the same base engine as i do, roller 5.0 with mild cam, long tube headers... HE has a high rise 4 bbl intake and carb, and he estimates 280. With daily drivers you have to fight tooth and nail to get the numbers as im sure you know, cant afford the downtime or big bucks in pistons, heads, etc to reach 300-350+ hp. I know it sounds off for my car to have such a 'low' number, but its just hard to make the big jump in power without alot of downtime and $$$$
Resid3nt
240 bhp for a 5.0 liter?

...
..
.
AHAAHABAHAHHHH


Go ahead and laugh, its whatever, im talkin about an ironhead engine, i rarely take it over 3-4k rpm so maybe im being modest, idk, im just not coming onto a thread with the ''my car is so much faster than everyones' cars'' attitude. I know there are plenty of cars around that could whoop me, especially since my car is 80s technology, im just trying to be realistic
Gundam Ace
Twistex
Gundam Ace
Millefune
Fox2102
Yeah you do a little under hood work to that 5.0 and that thing will fly. I mean hell you can strip them down to the frame pretty much.

You do even less work under the hood to an LS or HEMI engined car, and it will fly even more. I mean Hell, you can strip anything down to the frame pretty much.

Its all in the way you look at it, you are comparing a semi-modern carbureted/injected car with a 5.0 L sized engine with 225 hp stock vs a modern 5.7 L runnin a healthy 300-350 hp. I also own an 89 Mustang, Ive done quite a bit to it just below the point of aluminum heads or forced induction, Im guessing an honest 240-250 hp (never dynoed). Ive walked with newer Z28s and Trans Ams and held back. If I had had a hot 351 or a stroker equivalent to an LS engine, of course I woulda stood on it. At the time I just didnt really wanna read the guy's rear plate


You've done quite a bit to it, and still only push 240-250?

That's not right. A new set of pistons and headers have shown dyno results of 80+ bhp in a windsor 5.0.

Hell, even from stock, a new intake and carb, with a proper tune should net you more than 240bhp. s**t, I've seen carb spacer plates that added 12bhp/8ft-lbs on an SBC, and with the windsor being as stock-restrictive as it is, you should get comparable gains.

Methinks you've got something wrong there. Did you drop the A/C? Accessories are power leeches.

I know they are leeches, ive dropped the AIR pump but have everything else, the things you are saying are true, however i do not have new pistons, i know it would help. My car is fuel injected, and fuel injected 5.0 engines came stock with 225 hp, cherry and tuned. But, most stock, worn in fuel injected 5.0s nowadays push 190 average with stock equipment, starting from there you can see how 250 would be a noticeable improvement. I dont know why, but fuel injected 5.0/5.8 engines are alot harder to squeeze the numbers out than carbureted engines. A friend of mine has the same base engine as i do, roller 5.0 with mild cam, long tube headers... HE has a high rise 4 bbl intake and carb, and he estimates 280. With daily drivers you have to fight tooth and nail to get the numbers as im sure you know, cant afford the downtime or big bucks in pistons, heads, etc to reach 300-350+ hp. I know it sounds off for my car to have such a 'low' number, but its just hard to make the big jump in power without alot of downtime and $$$$


Damn, my V6 mustang pushes more than that. sad

Didn't know the injected ones suffered that much from age. (I'm a carbuerator kind of guy.)

The windsors are a strong base, but the stock equipment is extremely restrictive. Improving flow in/out adds a lot to the engines, hence why they're cheap fun for the strip. Bolt on packages for intake, exhaust headers, a mild cam, and they start growing quite well.

If that's an 89-series engine, then you're on a throttle body injection system, correct?

In that case, the same general rules apply. Increase flow. A larger TB, CAI and maybe a TB spacer, followed with headers, low restriction pipes, cats and mufflers, and you should get much better gains. I usually say "Do those first" because those systems will affect the gains from your other systems. After that, then if you're looking at valvework, cam increase, pistons, then I'd look at larger injectors. (they aren't really needed until you're pushing over 300, usually.)

It's a standard "ford issue". They make the intake and exhaust restrictive as hell for some godawful reason. The Windsor and Cologne engines have the same issues. sad
Resid3nt
240 bhp for a 5.0 liter?

...
..
.
AHAAHABAHAHHHH


Welcome to the restrictive world of stock parts. smile

(SBC's suffer from that as well, just not as much.)
Twistex
Gundam Ace
Twistex
Gundam Ace
Millefune
Fox2102
Yeah you do a little under hood work to that 5.0 and that thing will fly. I mean hell you can strip them down to the frame pretty much.

You do even less work under the hood to an LS or HEMI engined car, and it will fly even more. I mean Hell, you can strip anything down to the frame pretty much.

Its all in the way you look at it, you are comparing a semi-modern carbureted/injected car with a 5.0 L sized engine with 225 hp stock vs a modern 5.7 L runnin a healthy 300-350 hp. I also own an 89 Mustang, Ive done quite a bit to it just below the point of aluminum heads or forced induction, Im guessing an honest 240-250 hp (never dynoed). Ive walked with newer Z28s and Trans Ams and held back. If I had had a hot 351 or a stroker equivalent to an LS engine, of course I woulda stood on it. At the time I just didnt really wanna read the guy's rear plate


You've done quite a bit to it, and still only push 240-250?

That's not right. A new set of pistons and headers have shown dyno results of 80+ bhp in a windsor 5.0.

Hell, even from stock, a new intake and carb, with a proper tune should net you more than 240bhp. s**t, I've seen carb spacer plates that added 12bhp/8ft-lbs on an SBC, and with the windsor being as stock-restrictive as it is, you should get comparable gains.

Methinks you've got something wrong there. Did you drop the A/C? Accessories are power leeches.

I know they are leeches, ive dropped the AIR pump but have everything else, the things you are saying are true, however i do not have new pistons, i know it would help. My car is fuel injected, and fuel injected 5.0 engines came stock with 225 hp, cherry and tuned. But, most stock, worn in fuel injected 5.0s nowadays push 190 average with stock equipment, starting from there you can see how 250 would be a noticeable improvement. I dont know why, but fuel injected 5.0/5.8 engines are alot harder to squeeze the numbers out than carbureted engines. A friend of mine has the same base engine as i do, roller 5.0 with mild cam, long tube headers... HE has a high rise 4 bbl intake and carb, and he estimates 280. With daily drivers you have to fight tooth and nail to get the numbers as im sure you know, cant afford the downtime or big bucks in pistons, heads, etc to reach 300-350+ hp. I know it sounds off for my car to have such a 'low' number, but its just hard to make the big jump in power without alot of downtime and $$$$


Damn, my V6 mustang pushes more than that. sad

Didn't know the injected ones suffered that much from age. (I'm a carbuerator kind of guy.)

The windsors are a strong base, but the stock equipment is extremely restrictive. Improving flow in/out adds a lot to the engines, hence why they're cheap fun for the strip. Bolt on packages for intake, exhaust headers, a mild cam, and they start growing quite well.

If that's an 89-series engine, then you're on a throttle body injection system, correct?

In that case, the same general rules apply. Increase flow. A larger TB, CAI and maybe a TB spacer, followed with headers, low restriction pipes, cats and mufflers, and you should get much better gains. I usually say "Do those first" because those systems will affect the gains from your other systems. After that, then if you're looking at valvework, cam increase, pistons, then I'd look at larger injectors. (they aren't really needed until you're pushing over 300, usually.)

It's a standard "ford issue". They make the intake and exhaust restrictive as hell for some godawful reason. The Windsor and Cologne engines have the same issues. sad

You're 100% correct about the restrictive nature of stock Ford and Chevy parts, a friend has a 305 in his truck.. 180ish hp stock, so yah..
You're correct about the flow factor, making the car inhale and exhale better is the best 'Do first' as you say. My model is SFI instead of TBI, but yes the same principles apply. It has a bigger throttle body, TB spacer, better filter, bigger MAF housing, bigger inlet pipe, 5.0 explorer intake manifold (basically an uglier version of a cobra), explorer "P" heads that i ported the exhaust ports, 1.6 rockers i believe, ford "E" cam i believe, longtube headers, midchamber muffler and catback all 2.5''
So after that im either looking for new heads or a complete port, polish and valve job to those p heads.
I think we are basically on the same level of car knowledge
Aye, sounds like. smile

Didn't think all that work would put out numbers like that, though.

*Shrug*

I'm going to be a twit and chalk it up to injection, because, as I said.. Carbuerators for the win. biggrin
Twistex
Aye, sounds like. smile

Didn't think all that work would put out numbers like that, though.

*Shrug*

I'm going to be a twit and chalk it up to injection, because, as I said.. Carbuerators for the win. biggrin


As I said, I could be underestimating it, since ive never dynoed or anything, but thats what i say, its the injection stressed

So far it looks like carbs for the win. Especially if a friend of mine can make approx 350 hp with his buick 350 with stock heads, intake mani, even exhaust manifolds, and he only switched the cam.. I cant wait till i can afford a bigger engine. I plan a 67-68 Cougar project in my future and Im debating 289, 302, 351, 390, 408.. etc. Cougs have alot of range since some came with Windsors and some came with FEs. My opinion of course
Levis Pennae's avatar
  • 200
  • 200
  • 50
I would rather have someone under estimate than over estimate, especially without a dyno to back him up.
Levis Pennae
I would rather have someone under estimate than over estimate, especially without a dyno to back him up.

I agree
Twistex
Resid3nt
240 bhp for a 5.0 liter?

...
..
.
AHAAHABAHAHHHH


Welcome to the restrictive world of stock parts. smile

(SBC's suffer from that as well, just not as much.)


That, and it's an engine circa 20 years ago. Some people are just plain retarded.

Anyway, unless any of us are building an all-out drag-strip car (part of me wants to say even if we were), fuel injection is the way to go.
Millefune
Twistex
Resid3nt
240 bhp for a 5.0 liter?

...
..
.
AHAAHABAHAHHHH


Welcome to the restrictive world of stock parts. smile

(SBC's suffer from that as well, just not as much.)


That, and it's an engine circa 20 years ago. Some people are just plain retarded.

Anyway, unless any of us are building an all-out drag-strip car (part of me wants to say even if we were), fuel injection is the way to go.


You are correct, ppl usually fail to recognize the improvements between technology from the 80s (SFI 5.0 engines in my case) and modular 4.6/5.4 and LS engines.
True that drag cars can sport fuel injection or carburetion, ive seen both. I was just merely pointing out my opinion that carbureted engines are a bit easier to squeeze power out of than earlier fuel injected engines.
Idk who you are saying is retarded, but i hope it was that Resid3nt fellow
<.< >.> dramallama
Not you, obviously. I was talking about the guy who seems to think HP per liter is super important. HP per liter is ricer math. HP per pound is where it's at.

Quick Reply

Submit
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get Items
Get Gaia Cash
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff