Welcome to Gaia! ::

No.
Caring more about the truth than I do about the feelings of whingey moanbag entitled yanks is what makes you mistakenly perceive me as an a**.
Now that you're off pain killers, why are you such a c**t?

Dragons are many different things, according to the bible, but among them is nothing more than a large lizard.
The fire breath started out as just their tongue. Which was then depicted in art, by someone who had never seen the lizard, and thus the tongue wasn't accurate. The forks multiplied.
That art was then used as the basis. The forked nature of the tongue multiplied eventually coming to look like fire when represented.
Until some poor sap could no longer tell the difference between it and fire, and determined that it was fire, adding in a non-forked tongue behind it.


Cyclops are also believed to be based off rhino skeletons.
Unicorns are rhinos.
Behemoths are elephants.
And the leviathan is supposedly a large crocodile or alligator.

No, there's a mountain of evidence.
Damn clear evidence that only someone with a preconceived notion that they refuse to question could deny.

Like how the Velociraptor has quill knobs, bone structures present in most birds that fly and, specifically, are less prone to soaring.
Along with fossil evidence of feathers, and dinosaurs covering eggs exactly like a mother bird would.

I mean, sure, it's an interpretation.
Just like how it's my interpretation that if I stab you you'll end up bleeding.
Knife goes in blood comes out. Never a miscommunication.
You can't explain that.

Which is fine, but do you have any actual reasons to disagree with it or are you just trying to ignore logic to defend your baseless beliefs?