Welcome to Gaia! ::

Naw, I feel ya. I especially lol at the men who've lived their entire lives already circumcised condoning it, because ******** you ain't got no other experience to draw from so of course it ain't no big deal to you. And the men who do choose to get circumcised later on in life do it because the foreskin was presenting a problem in some manner, so of course it'll be a relief to have it gone.

Circumcision in my country is a crime punishable by law.
It's considerd irreversible physical harm, and the parents, nor religious freedom is able to justify such an act, is what it says.

It's a serious form of mutilation of the human body, and because it's not a necessary medical procedure and because it's irreversible it cannot be justified.
A violation of human rights.

There have been men who took this to court and won, but most guys don't do this since you would have to sue your own parents, and as we all know for the vast majority of people who got circumcised, they will defend the decision with their lives because they don't have a choice anymore anyways.

I think it's the only way to feel about it, the only honest way to look at it.
However if you are circumcised or American, you probably won't look at it the same.

The concern people against circumcision have stems from the estimation that the foreskin contains nearly 20,000 to 70,000 nerve endings and protects the glans of the p***s. This means that, having been removed, all the sensitivity those nerve endings provided are gone, along with the glans being exposed and able to rub on materials and lose sensitivity later on as well. The skin there sort of acts in the way that your eyelids do to make sure your eye isn't too dry and healthy.

Basically, guys with foreskin feels oodles more pleasure than a circumscribed guy could ever hope to, and it sucks that they didn't even get to choose that. How good the sex your future children may have is an odd thing to put into foresight maybe, but hell I'd rather the full experience be there for them.

It doesn't damage the genitalia as much as female genital mutilation does though, in that, the entire clitoris (the equivalent of the male glans) is removed, not only meaning it leaves the person with zero sexual sensitivity and therefore incapable of being physically stimulated, but often with various health problems. Its often done as a cultural means of controlling women's social status and sexual freedom.

Good goyim

That's nice smile . If I'd be a man I think I'd want to be circumcised aswell. It looks better.