Welcome to Gaia! ::


Dapper Reveler

They should be able to not pay for s**t. And uh, freedom of religion is pointless if its not freedom of practice.

Dapper Reveler

I put a ton of effort into this post.
Should a Jehovah's Witness who's employing you be able to demand that you don't use your healthcare to take blood transfusions?
Does that count as a glittering recommendation?
hahahalolwutccl
Should a Jehovah's Witness who's employing you be able to demand that you don't use your healthcare to take blood transfusions?


You're going to attempt to compare routine medication to emergency medication? Really? Something done for the woman's 'Hobby Lobby' to something that will stop someone from dying due to blood loss?
Old Blue Collar Joe
hahahalolwutccl
Should a Jehovah's Witness who's employing you be able to demand that you don't use your healthcare to take blood transfusions?


You're going to attempt to compare routine medication to emergency medication? Really? Something done for the woman's 'Hobby Lobby' to something that will stop someone from dying due to blood loss?
Joe, do you understand that many women take birth control to manage excruciatingly painful periods?

Nevermind, of course you don't.

Not that it matters. Contraception is healthcare, despite what folks think.

Tipsy Smoker

hahahalolwutccl
Should a Jehovah's Witness who's employing you be able to demand that you don't use your healthcare to take blood transfusions?
Leave us out of this.
Senior Airman Lima Zulu
Old Blue Collar Joe
hahahalolwutccl
Should a Jehovah's Witness who's employing you be able to demand that you don't use your healthcare to take blood transfusions?


You're going to attempt to compare routine medication to emergency medication? Really? Something done for the woman's 'Hobby Lobby' to something that will stop someone from dying due to blood loss?
Joe, do you understand that many women take birth control to manage excruciatingly painful periods?

Nevermind, of course you don't.

Not that it matters. Contraception is healthcare, despite what folks think.


Said numerous times that if the pill is prescribed for those issues, go for it. Same for Viagra. If it's prescribed for high blood pressure, that's one thing, but as a prescription for ********? Pay for it yourself.
No health care provider should be required to fund non-essentials.
Old Blue Collar Joe
Senior Airman Lima Zulu
Old Blue Collar Joe
hahahalolwutccl
Should a Jehovah's Witness who's employing you be able to demand that you don't use your healthcare to take blood transfusions?


You're going to attempt to compare routine medication to emergency medication? Really? Something done for the woman's 'Hobby Lobby' to something that will stop someone from dying due to blood loss?
Joe, do you understand that many women take birth control to manage excruciatingly painful periods?

Nevermind, of course you don't.

Not that it matters. Contraception is healthcare, despite what folks think.


Said numerous times that if the pill is prescribed for those issues, go for it. Same for Viagra. If it's prescribed for high blood pressure, that's one thing, but as a prescription for ********? Pay for it yourself.
No health care provider should be required to fund non-essentials.
Pregnancy is a health issue, so preventing it should not be called non-essential.
Senior Airman Lima Zulu
Old Blue Collar Joe
Senior Airman Lima Zulu
Old Blue Collar Joe
hahahalolwutccl
Should a Jehovah's Witness who's employing you be able to demand that you don't use your healthcare to take blood transfusions?


You're going to attempt to compare routine medication to emergency medication? Really? Something done for the woman's 'Hobby Lobby' to something that will stop someone from dying due to blood loss?
Joe, do you understand that many women take birth control to manage excruciatingly painful periods?

Nevermind, of course you don't.

Not that it matters. Contraception is healthcare, despite what folks think.


Said numerous times that if the pill is prescribed for those issues, go for it. Same for Viagra. If it's prescribed for high blood pressure, that's one thing, but as a prescription for ********? Pay for it yourself.
No health care provider should be required to fund non-essentials.
Pregnancy is a health issue, so preventing it should not be called non-essential.


You don't get pregnant if you're not having sex, and lack of sex isn't fatal, otherwise, we wouldn't have any teenagers reaching 20. It isn't the taxpayers responsibility to fund what is essentially a hobby.
You want to have sex, that is your choice and your business. It should also be your financial responsibility to fund it.

Dapper Reveler

hahahalolwutccl
Should a Jehovah's Witness who's employing you be able to demand that you don't use your healthcare to take blood transfusions?
They should be allowed to not pay for it.
Old Blue Collar Joe
Senior Airman Lima Zulu
Old Blue Collar Joe
Senior Airman Lima Zulu
Old Blue Collar Joe
hahahalolwutccl
Should a Jehovah's Witness who's employing you be able to demand that you don't use your healthcare to take blood transfusions?


You're going to attempt to compare routine medication to emergency medication? Really? Something done for the woman's 'Hobby Lobby' to something that will stop someone from dying due to blood loss?
Joe, do you understand that many women take birth control to manage excruciatingly painful periods?

Nevermind, of course you don't.

Not that it matters. Contraception is healthcare, despite what folks think.


Said numerous times that if the pill is prescribed for those issues, go for it. Same for Viagra. If it's prescribed for high blood pressure, that's one thing, but as a prescription for ********? Pay for it yourself.
No health care provider should be required to fund non-essentials.
Pregnancy is a health issue, so preventing it should not be called non-essential.


You don't get pregnant if you're not having sex, and lack of sex isn't fatal, otherwise, we wouldn't have any teenagers reaching 20. It isn't the taxpayers responsibility to fund what is essentially a hobby.
You want to have sex, that is your choice and your business. It should also be your financial responsibility to fund it.
Again, pregnancy is a public health issue. If insurance covers injuries people get while doing hobbies (driving, fishing, backpacking, sports/athletics) and especially covers body damage from cigarettes and alcohol, which are definitely "hobbies," then it's absurd to say BC shouldn't be paid for.

If you want even more bottom line, if you want less abortions, start funding BC. And education that revolves around BC. You can't tell people not to have sex as if that's a meaningful suggestion. It just doesn't work that way. Ever. Except in Lala Land.

Dapper Reveler

Senior Airman Lima Zulu
Old Blue Collar Joe
hahahalolwutccl
Should a Jehovah's Witness who's employing you be able to demand that you don't use your healthcare to take blood transfusions?


You're going to attempt to compare routine medication to emergency medication? Really? Something done for the woman's 'Hobby Lobby' to something that will stop someone from dying due to blood loss?
Joe, do you understand that many women take birth control to manage excruciatingly painful periods?

Nevermind, of course you don't.

Not that it matters. Contraception is healthcare, despite what folks think.
You chose to work there. Why should anyone feel obligated to even pay for your health care? Why not just ask them nicely? Do you really think you're on a moral high ground getting some guy with a gun (the government) to tell a company that earned their own money that they must now follow someone else's moral code under force of pain?

Newbie Noob

Avgvsto
They should be able to not pay for s**t. And uh, freedom of religion is pointless if its not freedom of practice.
But should religious organization be allowed to undermine the government?

This argument reminds me when a cop pulled over a muslim women. She gave him her ID, but she was wearing a berka making it physically impossible for the pig to identify her. She of course, refused to allow said pig to see her because for another man to view her (Other than her husband) was against her fate. Luckily, the pig smacked the s**t out of that dirty terrorist.

In any case ^.^

Separation of church and state does not mean one person can kill another on religious grounds. You can't break the law because our religion, so tuff s**t for hobby lobby.

Dapper Reveler

Senior Airman Lima Zulu
Again, pregnancy is a public health issue.
Hobby Lobby is a private company.

Senior Airman Lima Zulu
If insurance covers injuries people get while doing hobbies (driving, fishing, backpacking, sports/athletics) and especially covers body damage from cigarettes and alcohol, which are definitely "hobbies," then it's absurd to say BC shouldn't be paid for.
If Hobby Lobby was morally set against those sort of payments they would be the issue.


Senior Airman Lima Zulu
If you want even more bottom line, if you want less abortions, start funding BC. And education that revolves around BC. You can't tell people not to have sex as if that's a meaningful suggestion. It just doesn't work that way. Ever. Except in Lala Land.
Sure we can choose to fund it when we'd prefer that scenario, our objection is in that you believe that it is the governments job to tell us what we can and can not prefer.

Quick Reply

Submit
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum