Old Blue Collar Joe
Senior Airman Lima Zulu
Old Blue Collar Joe
Senior Airman Lima Zulu
Old Blue Collar Joe
hahahalolwutccl
Should a Jehovah's Witness who's employing you be able to demand that you don't use your healthcare to take blood transfusions?
You're going to attempt to compare routine medication to emergency medication? Really? Something done for the woman's 'Hobby Lobby' to something that will stop someone from dying due to blood loss?
Joe, do you understand that many women take birth control to manage excruciatingly painful periods?
Nevermind, of course you don't.
Not that it matters. Contraception is healthcare, despite what folks think.
Said numerous times that if the pill is prescribed for those issues, go for it. Same for Viagra. If it's prescribed for high blood pressure, that's one thing, but as a prescription for ********? Pay for it yourself.
No health care provider should be required to fund non-essentials.
Pregnancy is a health issue, so preventing it should not be called non-essential.
You don't get pregnant if you're not having sex, and lack of sex isn't fatal, otherwise, we wouldn't have any teenagers reaching 20. It isn't the taxpayers responsibility to fund what is essentially a hobby.
You want to have sex, that is your choice and your business. It should also be your financial responsibility to fund it.
Again, pregnancy is a public health issue. If insurance covers injuries people get while doing hobbies (driving, fishing, backpacking, sports/athletics) and especially covers body damage from cigarettes and alcohol, which are definitely "hobbies," then it's absurd to say BC shouldn't be paid for.
If you want even more bottom line, if you want less abortions, start funding BC. And education that revolves around BC. You can't tell people not to have sex as if that's a meaningful suggestion. It just doesn't work that way. Ever. Except in Lala Land.