Hawanja
black_wing_angel
Besides irrelevant to me, or anything I've said in this or any other thread?
Well you may be irrelevant to everything ever,
Statistically incorrect.
No it isn't.
Quote:
black_wing_angel
Only to other racist douchebags. You know what I see, when I look at it? I see an accurate representation of Barack. A man who apparently can't read cursive, because he blatantly disregards the Constitution, as if he'd never read it.
You only see racial overtones in it, because you want to see racial overtones in it. That's on you, and nobody else.
I'm assuming you can see the racist overtones in this sig, correct?
Yes I can. How is that relevant to anything?
Quote:
Is it "on me" this time? Am I the only one who's seeing the racism here?
Well...no. Because it's rather blatant. It's not a matter of you personally drawing parallels to what you individually perceive as a "subtle racist" connotation. That one's as blatant as blatant gets.
But again...what does that have to do with
anything?
Quote:
Could it be that maybe, just maybe, someone could see racism in the other sig as well?
Sure. I can see an image in an ink blot, too. That, too, is just my mind making comparisons that aren't actually there.
Quote:
black_wing_angel
Quote:
Does this help illustrate that having such a sig can give the perception of bias?
Or a perception of troll baiting. Either way, it doesn't matter to me. If they say something I agree with, then I agree with what they say. I don't approve of racism, especially as found in that username and signature, but free speech is free.
I'm not disputing this mans' right to free speech, only that posting an obvious racist image in one's signature exposes one's biases.
Not necessarily. There's such a thing as "trolling". I'm strongly suspicious that this might be such a case.
Quote:
black_wing_angel
Quote:
I mean seriously, if this example doesn't drive the point home, then I don't know what will.
So..did you have a point? Or are you just typing for the sake of wasting cyberspace?
First off, nobody said you had to respond.
I did.
3nodding I spoke silently to myself that "wow...that requires rebuttal."
Quote:
No one is putting a gun to your head and making you type out this response.
I know that. So what?
Quote:
You don't want to talk to me? Then don't, and move your stupid a** along.
It's not that I don't want to talk to you. It's that I'd rather we talk about something actually relevant to the conversation of this thread, and not you being butthurt that you're the only person who thinks Joe's sig is racist.
Quote:
Secondly, my point is the same point I made in the other thread,
So why didn't you leave it
in that thread?
Quote:
which you chose to ignore
I didn't "ignore" anything.
Quote:
-
How can I take your opinion seriously if you follow your post with a racist image?
To that end, I have no trouble taking ABNR's posts. It's the content within them, that matters.
Quote:
In this case, the fact that this guy posts this image tells me he has biases that go beyond the subject at hand, similarly in the other thread the fact that Blue Collar Joe follows his opinion of the president and NSA with his sig tells me he has similar biases.
You're entitled to your opinion.
Someone has to be wrong...
Quote:
Do you understand? You have a lot of mistaken, poorly formed opinions on a lot of things.
You're opinion, only....
Quote:
I'm sincerely trying to help you here.
No you're not. And I don't need nor want help from a closet racist.