TigerBeetMan
You've made some good points as well, however I would like to say something that differs from your last statement about how the hackers have made us aware of the problems in the system. I truly think that it's not that we don't know about the problems, it's that people just don't care. Generally, the average Joe has a very narrow view of the world and politics. I'm not saying that most people are
totally self centered but they are to a degree. I can say that I am self centered as well, but I also (not bragging) believe that I have a broader perspective on the world than most (and by self centered I don't mean they only care about themselves, I mean that they only tend to truly care about things that they interact with directly in their lives like their family members or cars). The reason I say this is because I am what many people would consider a "hacker". By hacker, I don't mean that I necessarily break into networks and systems but I do have extensive knowledge of the subject matter and could if I wanted to and I know, at the very least, that true hackers (most of the good "hackers" are true hackers) are only doing this with partial, and some would even say ephemeral, concern.
Now, the main reason hackers break into systems is because it gives them an adrenaline rush and a euphoric feeling of accomplishment. You might say "Well, the hell why? It's just a bunch of text on a screen!" and from a literal point of view you would be correct. However, there's something about a hacker's mentality that lets them get off whenever they find a solution to a problem. See, hackers look at most computer systems as sort of locked chests (problems) which need to be opened with a key (solution) in order to see what's inside. You could liken it to playing "explorer" from when you were a small kid. It's ultimately impossible to describe the rush and mix of feelings you get when you break into a system but I'm just trying to give you a general idea.
You may be wondering why I'm wasting your time by telling you this. It's because we can't rely on people with no real attachment to our problem to solve said problem for us. This goes back to what I was saying in my first post and the little bit about Fox news in there. I haven't just formulated this opinion from a couple hours of monitoring CNN. Whenever I give serious advice I always contemplate and research (if applicable) beforehand. I am a hacker but I am also a concerned US citizen and for me at least, being a US citizen that takes precedence over any feeling of excitement I might get from "sticking it to the man".
This final part of my insight is directed towards any minors that may be concerened about laws and bills that share the same ideas as SOPA and ACTA: Write your congressmen and write seriously. I mean if you have to break out spellcheck, a thesaurus, and do some research DO IT. I wrote my congressman and I'm only 16 so I don't want to hear "I can't vote, so it dosen't matter." or that sassy age old excuse that some of the more mongoloid-esque members of my age group say: "I'm a teenager. I can't do
anything because people don't treat me
maturely". Inactivity is the enemy of productivity.
I meant that we have to give the Internet some credit for being able to spread knowledge, but you are right in that apathy is a concern. Also, I like your point in how everyone should take advantage of being able to talk to and petition their government. Being a voter myself, I often see my status as a given, but there are many people who aren't legal voters that are organizing protests against acts like SOPA and ACTA as well.
I can't say I have dabbled in hacking but I have exploited glitches found solely on my own at a time. Of course, after they were found, they were soon fixed. Questioning also gives us a broader prospective as well, another thing many of us often don't do. Maybe a large majority won't care, but I hope some, make that most, of them will make that decision to stand up for themselves.
I'm against anyone discounting a message, through censorship or not, even a "bad" one. Sometimes the truth can be hidden within, or the flaws in the argument will become apparent. I think it's impossible to conclude all of Anonymous and other rogue groups are bad, because it's such a broad collection of people. Some are spreading truth and some are doing disservice to the whole. The government can, and has before twisted lies to their own will, effectively making people believe. It bothers me that greed is the motivator behind this whole process. Like the bill H.R. 1981, which Lamar Smith is gleefully exploiting on the basis of protecting the weakest among us while ignoring the fact that it does not actively prevent illegal activities in the offline world while still allowing an exploitable power in likeness to the NDAA. It not only hides the truth but it turns our good intentions against themselves. We all want laws that will help us, not harm us, and I wish Lamar Smith would create a bill that would allow convicted predators be detained and treated longer for their behavior, create more incentives for reporting crimes, all the while making available more resources for victims. Such would be more effective than controlling the grounds criminals choose for their hunts, which can be easily moved or circumvented. If getting people angry about these issues is what we have to do, then I agree with that. I still have faith those who learn will do the right thing, people will make decisions for themselves.
I was one of those people making excuses. Before, I was ignorant of much of the law. The first time I heard about this my first thought is that it would effectively stop artistry, in which case, would destroy everything. Not only everything I've worked for, but everything anyone else had, whether they took my path or not. I didn't want that, for me, or anyone else. I have a passion, and I'm not making money of it right now. If I did someday down the road, I imagine I would be upset if someone was making profit off my work, but would I want to stop people from sharing my passion in the claim that it is hurting my sales? I can't imagine I would. After all, what good is living if no one appreciates what you put forth? Somewhere along the line, the big-wigs in charge have to realize this. After all, it isn't the hard-working artists of the blanket corporations that are majorly supporting this.
We are all human and we grieve, we mourn, we smile, we laugh, all in the same way. This is an issue that effects EVERYONE. So everyone should care, regardless of what YOU are.
I've read over the ACTA text and it really does not specify how each country will be responsible, other than false charge for each "illegal" download. The main thing I don't like is the idea of any international law that ties the hands of each country to undo, especially when the lion's share of piracy comes from nations outside our jurisdiction. Like, China. It seems to me like walking around in an iron cage all day so you don't get hit with a stone. Maybe it would even work, but then I ask, what is the next step?
We're all allies in the fight for sharing free information,
Good job.