Rabbit_L
- Quote
- Report Post
- Posted: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:19:32 +0000
Eh, someone needs to be typed here D:
INTJ/INTP, although some friends like to refer me as an ENTJ due to my Te function which scores very high.
To start off with I'm in the middle ground between J/P as I am very judgmental but without the mindset of "willing to stick to the plan 100% of the time." I am fairly spontaneous but I want to know what I am doing.
I score very high in term of Te, though I'm pretty sure the Ti function is also equally dominant, which makes the typing more difficult :T I'm certain that N (be it e or i, I can't tell the difference D: ) would be my auxiliary function, but test wise I often get INTJ, because usually they are more leaned on the myers-briggs interpretations (which I personally find is a dumbed down version of Jung's) than Jung's.
I dislike the letter per letter approach because the extroverted/introverted version of T/F and S/N can be very different, and from lots of tests I've taken so far they seem to decide one's extro/introversion based on his socialness, which is not the exact definition of extro/introversion.
It becomes even more horrendous when one notices that an ISTJ and an INTJ can be very different-it's not just a flip of a letter, people, their functional preferences are not even closely similar.
INTJ/INTP, although some friends like to refer me as an ENTJ due to my Te function which scores very high.
To start off with I'm in the middle ground between J/P as I am very judgmental but without the mindset of "willing to stick to the plan 100% of the time." I am fairly spontaneous but I want to know what I am doing.
I score very high in term of Te, though I'm pretty sure the Ti function is also equally dominant, which makes the typing more difficult :T I'm certain that N (be it e or i, I can't tell the difference D: ) would be my auxiliary function, but test wise I often get INTJ, because usually they are more leaned on the myers-briggs interpretations (which I personally find is a dumbed down version of Jung's) than Jung's.
I dislike the letter per letter approach because the extroverted/introverted version of T/F and S/N can be very different, and from lots of tests I've taken so far they seem to decide one's extro/introversion based on his socialness, which is not the exact definition of extro/introversion.
It becomes even more horrendous when one notices that an ISTJ and an INTJ can be very different-it's not just a flip of a letter, people, their functional preferences are not even closely similar.