Ask Jappleack
(?)Community Member
- Posted: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:07:58 +0000
Do you think certain personalities are more advanced than others?
For example, avoiding bias when possible, and being coherent and honest as often as reasonably possible, compared to someone who is dishonest for gain or amusement, argues using logical fallacies, and seeks out self-gratification.
Like even if the second guy can convince more people of his ideas, doesn't make him more advanced nor more accurate, itd sooner make him a con artist, even if he believes half the s**t coming from his mouth.
The first person is a person who is more functional in a more futuristic and more utopian society than today, so technically thatd mean that person is more advanced.
Now Im goign to introduce a third type of person. A by-the-book kind of person who speaks matter of factly, is strict, and thinks the law is above morals kinda, a well educated person.
The problem with that type of person is when his information is outdated and he doesnt find out, or sitll clings onto the past of it because he was more succesful then, but some of them would admit their mistakes and possibly recognize their faults, but most of them would state their opinions as facts.
This person is also not as advanced as person number one because of the inflexibility and potential inaccuracies.
What simple description of a person could be more advanced than person number 1?
For example, avoiding bias when possible, and being coherent and honest as often as reasonably possible, compared to someone who is dishonest for gain or amusement, argues using logical fallacies, and seeks out self-gratification.
Like even if the second guy can convince more people of his ideas, doesn't make him more advanced nor more accurate, itd sooner make him a con artist, even if he believes half the s**t coming from his mouth.
The first person is a person who is more functional in a more futuristic and more utopian society than today, so technically thatd mean that person is more advanced.
Now Im goign to introduce a third type of person. A by-the-book kind of person who speaks matter of factly, is strict, and thinks the law is above morals kinda, a well educated person.
The problem with that type of person is when his information is outdated and he doesnt find out, or sitll clings onto the past of it because he was more succesful then, but some of them would admit their mistakes and possibly recognize their faults, but most of them would state their opinions as facts.
This person is also not as advanced as person number one because of the inflexibility and potential inaccuracies.
What simple description of a person could be more advanced than person number 1?