Welcome to Gaia! ::

People forget that the avatars are supposed to represent people with actual genitals and nipples. They just don't have them in case glitches go through. The fact that they are supposed to represent something with those parts is why they're supposed to be covered. The alruna does have nipples and never did as a spirit like this which is why it's okay to show, if that makes any sense. When she materializes into something more solid and human-like, i can gaurantee you that she'll be sporting some coverage.
Toxicnessx's avatar
  • 200
  • 100
  • 100
yea the "nude avatars" thing would be sorta gross in my opinion, and there wold be more cybering then ever but thats just mu prospective
hibi-tea's avatar
  • 100
  • 100
  • 150
ShadowToxic


I respect her opinion, mind you - its just that she is saying Alruna is nude despite the fact that devs have said she "COULD" be wearing a bodysuit. And people asking for "nude" AVATTARS have kinda ticked me off.


Could is not a definite. Which still leaves my concerns, feedback and suggestions very much valid as much as it irritates you. If the artist would be so kind as to tell us what exactly she is wearing this mess could be cleared in an instant (though I will admitt I still want to be able to be topless emo ).
Shuoko, i point, once again, to my image example that proves my point.

NOT TO MENTION the comics.
User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.

User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.


These comics were GEARED towards the area surrounding the age of 11. i have purchased some of these comics when they were released - honestly? Never would have thought "Oh joy! Boobies!!! *fapfapfap*"

i'm 22 and a male but i can say that what they are doing is in fact ARTISTIC nudity. But the problem i have with the AVATARS having naked breasts is because of idiots who will think "OMGSEXTIEM"

The item is fine. But Gaia can't change the retards who go straight to the gutter.
It follows the art regulations and items are practically pixelated art since the only function of them is to be visually appealing.

telling from the expression on her face there is no detestable messages, so it is considered 'tasteful nudity'

and PG-13 movies can show breasts as long as the nipples are covered.

my two cents ninja
hibi-tea's avatar
  • 100
  • 100
  • 150
Felix Virgo
Shuoko, i point, once again, to my image example that proves my point.

NOT TO MENTION the comics.
User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.

User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.


These comics were GEARED towards the area surrounding the age of 11. i have purchased some of these comics when they were released - honestly? Never would have thought "Oh joy! Boobies!!! *fapfapfap*"

i'm 22 and a male but i can say that what they are doing is in fact ARTISTIC nudity. But the problem i have with the AVATARS having naked breasts is because of idiots who will think "OMGSEXTIEM"

The item is fine. But Gaia can't change the retards who go straight to the gutter.



Than again you would understand my point if you had read it. If it's acceptable for Alruna to be that way, why isn't it for me? I have just as much definition as that picture you just showed.
_Shouko_
ShadowToxic


I respect her opinion, mind you - its just that she is saying Alruna is nude despite the fact that devs have said she "COULD" be wearing a bodysuit. And people asking for "nude" AVATTARS have kinda ticked me off.


Could is not a definite. Which still leaves my concerns, feedback and suggestions very much valid as much as it irritates you. If the artist would be so kind as to tell us what exactly she is wearing this mess could be cleared in an instant (though I will admitt I still want to be able to be topless emo ).


I'm not irritated - I'm actually amused.
ShadowToxic
Aevum Noir
_Shouko_
May I say I am 19, nearing 20 and I draw things like this. Lots of boobs and hell, even nakeds. The point you're not getting, the point you have even yet to grasp, is the fact that:

If it is considered bad PR to have avi's showing their breasts because it is "offensive" won't it be as equally bad PR to have Alruna showing her breasts and be equally as "offensive" to those who didn't like naked avi's in the first place?

Isn't it as bad for 13 year olds to have naked avi's as it to for 13 year olds to have Alruna's naked tits in their faces?

And if it's ok for Alruna to have naked breasts, for the superior form to have naked breast, for any other skin to have naked breasts, why isn't our natural avi skin ok? They're still breast, regardless of race, species or even if they're metal or furred.

If those are ok, than why isn't natural breasts ok? They're still colored the same. They show as little detail as the others do.

It boils down to the fact if it's not ok for us, than it isn't ok for Alruna, and if it's ok fro Alruna it should be ok for us.

Hopefully I have explained this in a way you will understand.

What are you after here Shouko?
Have you realized the fact that giving a female av freedom around the breast area is just asking for tons and tons of n00b accounts here just for cybering??
What, some of the others skins that don't have bras?
also don't have the nipples like alruna they also need some amount of work to get.
Also Alruna can't be used as something "play" with.
Your just asking for gaia to ruin a perfectly good item cause we can see her bust... for shame....
well some people just can't be satisfied can't they.

Anyway I support this thread, I hope they don't change it just cause of a few "concerns"..


I respect her opinion, mind you - its just that she is saying Alruna is nude despite the fact that devs have said she "COULD" be wearing a bodysuit. And people asking for "nude" AVATTARS have kinda ticked me off.

Yes I respect as well but I can't shake the feeling that she has some ulterior motive for all this. (then again I do find it hard to see the good in things)
And this asking for Nude av's is also pissing me off I mean it's an "item" not the actual av it's self which can be used in many wrong ways...
I couldn't care if she has a suit or not it's still not usable for anything wrong or that can violate some rule or something..
AceArchangel
It follows the art regulations and items are practically pixelated art since the only function of them is to be visually appealing.

telling from the expression on her face there is no detestable messages, so it is considered 'tasteful nudity'

and PG-13 movies can show breasts as long as the nipples are covered.

my two cents ninja


And covered well they are.
Shouko - need i say it again?

It's the retards who would EASILY manipulate this and do even when fully clothed. Fully-nude bases make these idiots think it okay to cyber (for some reason i cannot comprehend). i don't quite understand how it's attractive to them, but that's all i can offer, and that's what i've been saying.
ShadowToxic
AceArchangel
It follows the art regulations and items are practically pixelated art since the only function of them is to be visually appealing.

telling from the expression on her face there is no detestable messages, so it is considered 'tasteful nudity'

and PG-13 movies can show breasts as long as the nipples are covered.

my two cents ninja


And covered well they are.
*edit* nevermind i just remembered across the universe and titanic.

there is no disputable law suit against gaia for this in the first place, before you join it clearly states that it is for 13+ users and may contain rated PG-13 material (*ahem* most of the time above that) and since they are not fully exposed it's fine.
hibi-tea's avatar
  • 100
  • 100
  • 150
Aevum Noir

Yes I respect as well but I can't shake the feeling that she has some ulterior motive for all this. (then again I do find it hard to see the good in things)
And this asking for Nude av's is also pissing me off I mean it's an "item" not the actual av it's self which can be used in many wrong ways...
I couldn't care if she has a suit or not it's still not usable for anything wrong or that can violate some rule or something..


Quote:
If it is considered bad PR to have avi's showing their breasts because it is "offensive" won't it be as equally bad PR to have Alruna showing her breasts and be equally as "offensive" to those who didn't like naked avi's in the first place?

Isn't it as bad for 13 year olds to have naked avi's as it to for 13 year olds to have Alruna's naked tits in their faces?

And if it's ok for Alruna to have naked breasts, for the superior form to have naked breast, for any other skin to have naked breasts, why isn't our natural avi skin ok? They're still breast, regardless of race, species or even if they're metal or furred.

If those are ok, than why isn't natural breasts ok? They're still colored the same. They show as little detail as the others do.

It boils down to the fact if it's not ok for us, than it isn't ok for Alruna, and if it's ok fro Alruna it should be ok for us.


^ My whole arguement in a nutshell.

Felix Virgo: And again people cybered way before avatars were ever made. WAY before. You CANNOT stop them from cybering. If they're gonna do it they're gonna do it. An item, nudity, anything of the like has absolutely no bearing on ti whatsoever. It is a terrible argument, easily refutable and yet people still keep trying to use it.
Oh ... and even if she is nude, you have to realize that

ALRUNA
IS
A
FREAKIN'
SUCCUBUS


Of COURSE she's trying to seduce with hotness and nudity!!! That's the theme of the item!!!! But that doesn't make it okay to have nude avatar bases!!!
_Shouko_
Myliu Temptations
I think the people who are whining are either under age-which they shouldn't be on here in the first place, or they're bigots who don't appreiate all the love the artists put into the work. I can tell right now that o_8 put a lot of thought into the pose in question and that if they knew it was going to be a problem that they wouldn't have let o_8 do it in the first place. Sure they have the right to b***h and whine all they want, it doesn't mean Gaia HAS to listen to them. rolleyes Personally, I think they're acting like a bunch of children and they need to grow the ******** up. There's loopholes to having your avatar be almost completely topless- Oh say, for example, the suspenders? Maybe the kiddies in here had their way with the Imp feet, but the Gaia Admins KNOW there'll be an even bigger backlash than that if this goes their way. Not to mention, an option to be topless would be nice for cosplay reasons, but other than that, I can't see people really using it. It's like a small child wanting a toy. Once they get it, they lose all interest. Simple logic.
Anyways, I'm done with my ran and if you want to argue with me, suit yourself. It's MY opinion and I'm not gonna change it. ^^


May I direct you to my statement below, as the original thread maker of the thread in question:


Quote:
May I say I am 19, nearing 20 and I draw things like this. Lots of boobs and hell, even nakeds. The point you're not getting, the point you have even yet to grasp, is the fact that:

If it is considered bad PR to have avi's showing their breasts because it is "offensive" won't it be as equally bad PR to have Alruna showing her breasts and be equally as "offensive" to those who didn't like naked avi's in the first place?

Isn't it as bad for 13 year olds to have naked avi's as it to for 13 year olds to have Alruna's naked tits in their faces?

And if it's ok for Alruna to have naked breasts, for the superior form to have naked breast, for any other skin to have naked breasts, why isn't our natural avi skin ok? They're still breast, regardless of race, species or even if they're metal or furred.

If those are ok, than why isn't natural breasts ok? They're still colored the same. They show as little detail as the others do.

It boils down to the fact if it's not ok for us, than it isn't ok for Alruna, and if it's ok fro Alruna it should be ok for us.

Hopefully I have explained this in a way you will understand.


May I also guarentee to you the people who are speaking in that thread are not all minors, and could very well be much older than yourself. so before you go about insulting people please actually read the thread.
Exactly. They're minors or bigots. neutral They're mostly just jealous of alruna's breasts. No offense, but to me your main point is to be a killjoy. It's not cool AT ALL. It's not mature, it's not 'Adult-like', and it's not going to get you ANYWHERE with my own opinion. ^_^ Not to mention, I did read all the posts in this thread. Almost every single one of them was complimenting them. I could hoestly care less about avi's being nude, but if girls get boobs, the guys will BAWWWW until they get to have no underwear, which would be breaching the PG-13 limit here. For the avi's and alruna, it's like guys and girls wearing shirts. Sure, guys can go shirtless, but girls can't because it's not 'politically correct.' With Alruna, it's basically the same thing. She's an Item. She isn't even human. Besides, it's showing most of the breast. If it showed the nipples, I'm sure it'd be a different story since, yes the avatars can be mostly naked without showing where the n****e area already is.

Also, how about YOU don't go insulting someone because you're older than them. neutral It doesn't flatter you at all. It just makes you look rude.

EDIT: Not to mention the avi's naked are SUPER UBER FUGLY.
So can we see some v****a too and just take away the c**t, slit, and pubic hair, or is that too much of adult content.

Quick Reply

Submit
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get Items
Get Gaia Cash
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff