 |
relevancy, plz
|
|
|
I think Relevancy should be default. =] With Most Listings, if you typed "Blue Hat," you tend to get hats that aren't blue as the first results. |
 |
|
|
Either Relevancy or Lowest Price First.
I mean, come on... everyone wants to get a deal. |
|
|
I'd like an option for both, but a default as relevancy.
|
|
|
|
that means it will search for something that is related?
i say go with the Relevancy |
|
Relaxin In Paradise-Gallade
|
Relevancy, but I think it should be stronger than that. If I type in Dark Halo, why am I getting every single Halo Gaia has ever made? If I have the exact name of the item I want, I still have to sort through a giant list to find it? No no no. Bad bad bad. A perfect match with no partial matches should be just that. A perfect match.
Of course, there are some snags... I guess there's ambiguity even there. It just seems strange that if you search for something specific, you get a general list, whereas if you search for something general (like unicorn, hoping to find the Fausto's bottle which CONTAINED a unicorn) you get the Unicorn Horn. Hm. |
|
|
|
For game items, could you make the "Buy Now" price be per item instead of the total asking price?
Example: Token x1 for 2 gold (2 gold/1 Token) beats Token x100 for 100 gold (1 gold/1 Token) in the listing because of the total gold instead of how much gold per token. |
|
|
I'd like it to sort by Price per Item separate from the Buy Now Price so that people could find cheapest price for a multiplied item. For example: If an there are 5 items put up for 1g it would be sorted as 0.20g, which would be lower then, say, 1 item for 1g and would thus appear higher up the list.
Edit: This is quite like what dreamsk recently posted. I'm sorry for repeating it. |
|
|
|
How would you determine relevancy? If I type in "boot", what would then be the most bootiest boot on Gaia?
Anyway, I vote for having options. |
|
|
It would be nice to have (not as default, but as an option)
Sort by Number of Items Sort by Cost Per Item for "stackable" items (tickets, tokens, game items, etc) edit: OK, it looks like it's been said at least a couple of times. But I'm adding my vote to the idea 3nodding |
|
|
QUESTING:
|
"AlexDitto" Relevancy, but I think it should be stronger than that. If I type in Dark Halo, why am I getting every single Halo Gaia has ever made? If I have the exact name of the item I want, I still have to sort through a giant list to find it? No no no. Bad bad bad. A perfect match with no partial matches should be just that. A perfect match. Of course, there are some snags... I guess there's ambiguity even there. It just seems strange that if you search for something specific, you get a general list, whereas if you search for something general (like unicorn, hoping to find the Fausto's bottle which CONTAINED a unicorn) you get the Unicorn Horn. Hm. I think with the Fausto example, it's because it doesn't have "unicorn" as a keyword. When it first came out, it was a surprise what it was going to be, so giving it a keyword of unicorn would have spoiled that. Perhaps they need to update the keywords of evo items as they evolve. |
|
QUESTING:
|
i like it how it is
|
|
|
|
relevancy would be better
|
|
|
I would like a choice between the two. It would make things so much more convenient. |
|
|
