Votaro
Look it up, the acclaimed evidences are fabricated.
Use this search and read whatever articles you find.
"FDA Chemical Imbalance"
Not even having entered it, these search terms seem subtly but exquisitely tuned to turn up results promoting conspiracy theories rather than
scientific evidence. And indeed when I tried it, I only got one actual peer-reviewed study; the next results were the Scientologist organization CCHR, an internet forum, an essay in Society, etc. Here's a better idea: look up some given disorders on Wikipedia, note their suspected causes, and search Google Scholar for terms related to those causes.
Funny thing happened when I tried that just now. I looked up Dissociative Identity Disorder (i.e. "multiple personalities" ) and didn't see a "chemical imbalance" type of explanation. Bipolar Disorder didn't turn up a single cause but a variety of suspected mechanisms including environmental factors and traumatic experiences. I looked up clinical depression and likewise found that it wasn't being ascribed to a simple "chemical imbalance" model. You know what this tells me? I suspect this whole "chemical imbalance" thing is a fundamental misunderstanding and oversimplified straw-man for conventional psychological science. It seems that some people latch on to the most popular aspect of
treatment (prescription medicine and anti-depressants) and extrapolate from this one facet the mistaken idea that
psychologists think the whole thing is as simple as a chemical deficit. What I'm seeing doesn't line up with the objections to "chemical imbalance" as presented by your special interest groups.