Vannak
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Sat, 05 May 2012 16:05:53 +0000
Suicidesoldier#1
Vannak
Suicidesoldier#1
Vannak
Suicidesoldier#1
Vannak
I haven't thought about or know about the relationship between intelligence and sentience to say that one won't eventually cause the other. It's a somewhat reasonable assumption: For instance, an type of AI we have today, automatic stock traders, have to account for their own behavior to accurately and precisely trade. That kind of introspection from a sophisticated enough AI may lead to sentience.
Calculators are very intelligent, but are not sentient.
They can't really make decisions and they don't think.
They just do.
Input commands give an output.
Just becuase it's complex doesn't mean it's sentient.
Soon as we give them the ability to think about things, we're in for trouble, even if they can't act on them.
Give them free thought but not free will- why it might as well be slavery.
Calculators are as intelligent... how?
Quick!
Preform 2,125,456,285 x 299,792,458!
And GO!
You lack a decent understanding of what intelligence is.
Computation, Problem solving, reasoning (as in which thing to use etc.)
I'm pretty sure a calculator fits in there quite nicely.
The point is that raw computation power would not result in sentience.
Thinking, feeling, consciousness, they are different traits all their own.
Even something as advanced as an AI, such as in a video game, could not qualify as sentient.
That would require abstract and perhaps quite arbitrary thought- a thinking machine.
Just because it can quickly do computation faster than humans, that doesn't mean it's smarter than us, it means when you focus it's tiny computational capacity to do one thing it can do it quickly.