stealthmongoose
Here though, i'd like to ask about the scientific values behind this assertion. We can classify mental illness as neurological, behavioral, and physical disorders, but why would any psychiatrist who bases his practice in science ignore that fact when it comes to religion?
Do you have any grounds on which to diagnose a religious belief as a disorder? Or, can you show that religious belief is not normal function for a healthy human brain?
Quote:
As a side note, i'd like to assert that any psychiatrist who ignores these behaviors in the religious is in fact committing malpractice.
Malpractice is a legal term. A psychiatrist who does not deviate from the standard of care is likely not committing malpractice. If a psychiatrist were to diagnose a religious believer as mentally ill, treat based off it, and cause harm, that would likely be considered malpractice because it's outside the standard of care and not evidence based. So, contrary to what you assert, someone who is doing what you say actually puts themselves at risk for liability.
Quote:
If the same disorders, behaviors, and harms that come from mental illness are indicative of those who have adopted a faith more-so than those who have not, then where is the justification in treating one group as though they have a free pass to act schizophrenic, murderous, or harmful to their society?
You're confusing law and medicine.