FocusedIntent
(?)Community Member
Offline
- Posted: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 07:12:05 +0000
In this thread I would like to prove definitively that evolution is factually incorrect and actually just a part of a new religion called Science which has been adopted by Atheists requiring illogical leaps of faith from its followers just as all religions do. One thing I have noticed is that the biggest opponent of evolution is religious believers like Christians who support the theory of creationism. What typically happens is that Atheists who believe in evolution attack the religion of the creationist pointing out the logical flaws in their silly usually misinterpreted religion as a way of defending evolution. This is not a valid way to defend evolution and merely a desperate attempt to substantiate their claims in my opinion.
All religions are a form of social control and all religions, including science, require many leaps of illogical faith this is why the definition of religion is any belief held to with faith or ardor. I contend that Science is the modern day religion of the times. I practice and worship no religion. I am merely a seeker of true knowledge and a free thinker. I believe it’s time we stopped spreading lies and deception teaching it to our children as fact in schools aka brain washing indoctrination pens for the youth. This also applies to religious fanatics who impose their flawed misinterpreted religious beliefs on helpless children who are too young and naive to question what they are being taught.
Here is a brief outline of the topics I will discuss that undoubtedly disprove Darwin’s theory of evolution.
1. Spontaneous Generation The idea that inanimate matter could somehow miraculously create organic matter, consciousness, and living beings. A common belief in the past.
2. Transitional Fossil Forms (missing link) The belief that fossils would be found in the future showing once species transitioning into another species.
3. Assumption of Simplicity of Cell In the past cells observed under a microscope were believed to consist of few easily assembled components completely underestimating the complexity of a cell and its functions.
4.The Cambrian Explosion Fossils appearing suddenly without any predecessors or signs of evolution.
5.Adaptation The confusion of adaptation being proof of evolution.
SPONTANEOUS GENERATION
According to evolution everything evolved from the ocean from single celled organisms. How did life get there to begin with? There are two basic theories not including creationism. One is panspermia which is the belief that life exists throughout the universe and was seeded into the oceans either by comets and meteorites or other unknown means including possible extraterrestrial visitations by technologically advanced civilizations. The other theory is what Darwin himself believed and that is spontaneous generation.
Darwin believed in Spontaneous Generation as described in his famous letter to Joseph Hooker. It is this idea that inspired the Miller Urey experiment where scientists used chemicals in a flask representing the elementary chemicals that supposedly made up earth when it was first formed like water, methane, ammonia, hydrogen and also a constant electrical spark to represent lightning. Not surprisingly they failed to create any type of life from this concoction. Spontaneous generation has been disproven over and over it does not exist. In fact, according to spontaneous generation, rotting flesh could produce maggots. That is a perfect example of a misunderstanding of nature by those who believe in spontaneous generation and this is the type of flawed logic that is being used to describe evolution.
Many people believe that Spontaneous Generation is an outdated idea of the past and no longer used in science. That is not true either. Today science is trying to prove, and even teaches, that inanimate physical objects such as the brain can create something completely unphysical like consciousness. That is nothing more than foolish spontaneous generation on hyper steroids masquerading as a sound theory. Just as the Miller Urey experiments failed to produce amino acids that would bind together into proteins and cells no experiment will ever be able to create consciousness from physical things because the brain does not create consciousness.
TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL FORMS (The Missing Link)
Darwin knew that the extensive fossil collection he had gathered did not support his claims about evolution. This is because the fossil record shows no evidence of one species transitioning into another one. In his book he states, "The distinctiveness of specific forms, and their not being blended together by innumerable transitional links, is a very obvious difficulty... Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely-graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection to my theory" (p. 287).
To put it very simply Darwin had hoped that in the future when more fossils were found that some of those fossils would show a transition from one species to another. It has been over 150 years and still no fossil evidence has ever been found to support a transition from one species to another. In fact the opposite has occurred whereby many more species than Darwin ever could have imagined with no evolutionary link have been discovered. It appalls me the absurd claims that scientists will make to try to substantiate this “missing link.” To support these absurd theory’s that Humans may have evolved from primates supposed pre human bones they often claim are Cro-Magnon (human) such as the famous “Lucy” skeleton is not human at all, but primate bones! There is no transitional forms and as Darwin himself said, “and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection to my theory.”
ASSUMPTION OF CELL SIMPLICITY
Darwin lived in a time where only simple crude microscopes were available and not much was known about the cell. Darwin assumed they were primitive and could be easily assembled hints why he thought spontaneous generation could easily create them. Cell evolution is an impossibility as something called irreducible complexity demonstrates. A cell cannot function without all its parts working together harmoniously all at the same time. So either all the parts of the cell must have come into existence at the same time or the cell would not function and it would die. This directly contradicts evolution which proposes the parts evolved one at a time. The definition of irreducible complexity is a system which is composed of several interacting parts that contribute to the basic function, and where the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning. In his book Darwin stated, ““If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down. But I can find no such case.” Today, with the advances in technology and understandings of biology and cell function, this has absolutely been demonstrated and the theory of evolution does in fact break down.
THE CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION
According to the fossil record which has never revealed any transitional fossils during the Cambrian period approximately 542 million years ago most of the animal phyla suddenly appeared all together with absolutely no evolution taking place. The Cambrian explosion completely destroys Darwin’s tree of life and Darwin himself said, "To the question why we do not find rich fossiliferous deposits belonging to these assumed earliest periods prior to the Cambrian system, I can give no satisfactory answer ... The difficulty of assigning any good reason for the absence of vast piles of strata rich in fossils beneath the Cambrian is very great . . . The case at present must remain inexplicable; and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained" ( The Origin of Species, pp. 309-310).
Darwin is telling you himself that his theory is flawed and yet these ideas are still being pushed why is this? In fact a more accurate representation of Darwin’s tree of life according to the fossil record is to completely flip it upside down with many animals suddenly appearing at once with no evolution taking place at all.
ADAPTATION
The very last thing that Darwin has going for him is adaptation. I do agree that animals are capable of adapting to their environment over time such as a butterfly changing its camouflage or animals trapped on an island growing smaller. Simple adaptation observed in different species what Darwin terms variation of species cannot be used as evidence of evolution. Adaptation is also called adaptive traits. Traits are influenced by genes which is a portion of a chromosome, which is a very long and compacted string of DNA and proteins. Understand that inside every species DNA has the blueprints for many different physical traits. When the elephant gets stuck on the island and begins to shrink it is not evolving to be smaller it is simply activating different traits within its DNA which make it shrink in size thus becoming better adapted to its environment and limited resources.
When your hair or eye color is inherited you have traits for many different colors within your DNA. If in the future your offspring inherit differently colored eyes or hair than you have that is not proof of evolution it just shows different traits being activated. The elephant or any species for that matter is not capable of evolving into another species because the blueprints for the other species are not present in its DNA, but the trait for the elephant becoming smaller is. The same way the pigeons Darwin was fascinated with displayed different traits yet they were all still pigeons there was no evolution taking place just different pigeons displaying different traits they all have within their identical DNA.
In conclusion I hope you now see the fundamental flaws in the theory of evolution. I believe it is of critical importance that we stop mass brainwashing our children with propaganda and lies. Evolution has no place in school. Science is nothing more than a religion requiring illogical leaps of faith. For those that claim science is not a religion I would like to point out that it is just as illogical to believe in a big bang as it is to believe in a creator God. Both are religions and as I said all religions are nothing more than a means of social control to dominate the masses. It is time we start to think for our self and you as a free thinker should question everything you are told especially by those who claim to be an authority over you. I am sovereign and there is none who have authority over me. I will continue to think and ponder the greater meanings of life and I hope you will also.
If you would like to know more about the true nature of reality here is a link to another thread I have created. The Predator of Consciousness
All religions are a form of social control and all religions, including science, require many leaps of illogical faith this is why the definition of religion is any belief held to with faith or ardor. I contend that Science is the modern day religion of the times. I practice and worship no religion. I am merely a seeker of true knowledge and a free thinker. I believe it’s time we stopped spreading lies and deception teaching it to our children as fact in schools aka brain washing indoctrination pens for the youth. This also applies to religious fanatics who impose their flawed misinterpreted religious beliefs on helpless children who are too young and naive to question what they are being taught.
Here is a brief outline of the topics I will discuss that undoubtedly disprove Darwin’s theory of evolution.
1. Spontaneous Generation The idea that inanimate matter could somehow miraculously create organic matter, consciousness, and living beings. A common belief in the past.
2. Transitional Fossil Forms (missing link) The belief that fossils would be found in the future showing once species transitioning into another species.
3. Assumption of Simplicity of Cell In the past cells observed under a microscope were believed to consist of few easily assembled components completely underestimating the complexity of a cell and its functions.
4.The Cambrian Explosion Fossils appearing suddenly without any predecessors or signs of evolution.
5.Adaptation The confusion of adaptation being proof of evolution.
SPONTANEOUS GENERATION
According to evolution everything evolved from the ocean from single celled organisms. How did life get there to begin with? There are two basic theories not including creationism. One is panspermia which is the belief that life exists throughout the universe and was seeded into the oceans either by comets and meteorites or other unknown means including possible extraterrestrial visitations by technologically advanced civilizations. The other theory is what Darwin himself believed and that is spontaneous generation.
Darwin believed in Spontaneous Generation as described in his famous letter to Joseph Hooker. It is this idea that inspired the Miller Urey experiment where scientists used chemicals in a flask representing the elementary chemicals that supposedly made up earth when it was first formed like water, methane, ammonia, hydrogen and also a constant electrical spark to represent lightning. Not surprisingly they failed to create any type of life from this concoction. Spontaneous generation has been disproven over and over it does not exist. In fact, according to spontaneous generation, rotting flesh could produce maggots. That is a perfect example of a misunderstanding of nature by those who believe in spontaneous generation and this is the type of flawed logic that is being used to describe evolution.
Many people believe that Spontaneous Generation is an outdated idea of the past and no longer used in science. That is not true either. Today science is trying to prove, and even teaches, that inanimate physical objects such as the brain can create something completely unphysical like consciousness. That is nothing more than foolish spontaneous generation on hyper steroids masquerading as a sound theory. Just as the Miller Urey experiments failed to produce amino acids that would bind together into proteins and cells no experiment will ever be able to create consciousness from physical things because the brain does not create consciousness.
TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL FORMS (The Missing Link)
Darwin knew that the extensive fossil collection he had gathered did not support his claims about evolution. This is because the fossil record shows no evidence of one species transitioning into another one. In his book he states, "The distinctiveness of specific forms, and their not being blended together by innumerable transitional links, is a very obvious difficulty... Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely-graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection to my theory" (p. 287).
To put it very simply Darwin had hoped that in the future when more fossils were found that some of those fossils would show a transition from one species to another. It has been over 150 years and still no fossil evidence has ever been found to support a transition from one species to another. In fact the opposite has occurred whereby many more species than Darwin ever could have imagined with no evolutionary link have been discovered. It appalls me the absurd claims that scientists will make to try to substantiate this “missing link.” To support these absurd theory’s that Humans may have evolved from primates supposed pre human bones they often claim are Cro-Magnon (human) such as the famous “Lucy” skeleton is not human at all, but primate bones! There is no transitional forms and as Darwin himself said, “and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection to my theory.”
ASSUMPTION OF CELL SIMPLICITY
Darwin lived in a time where only simple crude microscopes were available and not much was known about the cell. Darwin assumed they were primitive and could be easily assembled hints why he thought spontaneous generation could easily create them. Cell evolution is an impossibility as something called irreducible complexity demonstrates. A cell cannot function without all its parts working together harmoniously all at the same time. So either all the parts of the cell must have come into existence at the same time or the cell would not function and it would die. This directly contradicts evolution which proposes the parts evolved one at a time. The definition of irreducible complexity is a system which is composed of several interacting parts that contribute to the basic function, and where the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning. In his book Darwin stated, ““If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down. But I can find no such case.” Today, with the advances in technology and understandings of biology and cell function, this has absolutely been demonstrated and the theory of evolution does in fact break down.
THE CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION
According to the fossil record which has never revealed any transitional fossils during the Cambrian period approximately 542 million years ago most of the animal phyla suddenly appeared all together with absolutely no evolution taking place. The Cambrian explosion completely destroys Darwin’s tree of life and Darwin himself said, "To the question why we do not find rich fossiliferous deposits belonging to these assumed earliest periods prior to the Cambrian system, I can give no satisfactory answer ... The difficulty of assigning any good reason for the absence of vast piles of strata rich in fossils beneath the Cambrian is very great . . . The case at present must remain inexplicable; and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained" ( The Origin of Species, pp. 309-310).
Darwin is telling you himself that his theory is flawed and yet these ideas are still being pushed why is this? In fact a more accurate representation of Darwin’s tree of life according to the fossil record is to completely flip it upside down with many animals suddenly appearing at once with no evolution taking place at all.
ADAPTATION
The very last thing that Darwin has going for him is adaptation. I do agree that animals are capable of adapting to their environment over time such as a butterfly changing its camouflage or animals trapped on an island growing smaller. Simple adaptation observed in different species what Darwin terms variation of species cannot be used as evidence of evolution. Adaptation is also called adaptive traits. Traits are influenced by genes which is a portion of a chromosome, which is a very long and compacted string of DNA and proteins. Understand that inside every species DNA has the blueprints for many different physical traits. When the elephant gets stuck on the island and begins to shrink it is not evolving to be smaller it is simply activating different traits within its DNA which make it shrink in size thus becoming better adapted to its environment and limited resources.
When your hair or eye color is inherited you have traits for many different colors within your DNA. If in the future your offspring inherit differently colored eyes or hair than you have that is not proof of evolution it just shows different traits being activated. The elephant or any species for that matter is not capable of evolving into another species because the blueprints for the other species are not present in its DNA, but the trait for the elephant becoming smaller is. The same way the pigeons Darwin was fascinated with displayed different traits yet they were all still pigeons there was no evolution taking place just different pigeons displaying different traits they all have within their identical DNA.
In conclusion I hope you now see the fundamental flaws in the theory of evolution. I believe it is of critical importance that we stop mass brainwashing our children with propaganda and lies. Evolution has no place in school. Science is nothing more than a religion requiring illogical leaps of faith. For those that claim science is not a religion I would like to point out that it is just as illogical to believe in a big bang as it is to believe in a creator God. Both are religions and as I said all religions are nothing more than a means of social control to dominate the masses. It is time we start to think for our self and you as a free thinker should question everything you are told especially by those who claim to be an authority over you. I am sovereign and there is none who have authority over me. I will continue to think and ponder the greater meanings of life and I hope you will also.
If you would like to know more about the true nature of reality here is a link to another thread I have created. The Predator of Consciousness
