grey wanderer
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 17:21:04 +0000
Maze1125
I still hold it's possible to divide by zero.
It's just that most of the time it comes up with answers most people don't like.
It can be made consistent, but not under the usual axioms of arithmetic or algebra. The funny thing is, the debate about division by 0 didn't really heat-up until 1734 when George Berkeley brought it up in a book whose content was levelled against Newton's form of calculus. There were a variety of problems with the math of the time and there were several mathematicains who would disagree and argue over the value (or legitimacy) of certain infinite sums. it took well over 100 years of effort before a solid foundation could be put underneath the ideas of derivatives, infinite sums, and irrational numbers. Thus was born the "limit" and several other interesting notions. That need-- the need to make every thing consistent and derivable from a few core ideas-- is (I believe) from whence the division legaleese arose. So you can see it's a tricky deal. Look into "The extended reals"(aka the affinely extended reals) or the "projectively extended reals" if you'd like to see two mathematical system where division by 0 is (under the appropriate conditions) allowed-- perhaps one of these two systems is more in keeping with your intuition...