Disconsented
mace_of_knowledge
Disconsented
mace_of_knowledge
Disconsented
mace_of_knowledge
in addition you have the old form of soldier in the shocktroops which can be made relevant and applicable again-something like halo spartans.
again no intent to carry out, further, or incite, harm. what this is intended to produce is a suit of armor with added capabilities. consider a full ballistic suit merged with a jet pack and a smartphone.
Currently a jet pack is unrealistic or anything similar to Mjlinar Armour falls under that category (Read: The spartan development process). I said like a MAX suit for a reason because it is closer to being fringe science than science fiction. Albeit the weapons would not be like they are featured in Planetside.
fringe science is not required for this project, I have witnessed a jetplane the size of a 1950's vw bug fly just fine. yes it was for just a short time. But still the technology is there we just need to make it smaller and update it with the knowledge that we have gained. if innovations result durring its manufacture-yAy-however this need not happen to be considered a success
my best linnk
my second best link
My point with these links is that the size of an "aircraft" (so to speak) need not be dictated by commercial standards. I mean just LOOK at how small these things are and look at the empty space of the cockpit. Conceptually and practically there is little stopping one from eliminating unused space and redesigning the fuselage into an iron man LIKE contraption. and again the wings are present so we are not completely true to the aesthetic design, however one step at a time.
They are aircraft and as such are made from
very light materials that provide minimal protection. Now look at something like the Martin Jet Pack. At this point in time a jetpack is unrealistic until somebody can create a better propulsion method.
To stretch the limits of commercially available technology i would stress two of
these mounted on the back of the armor, a custom ramjet would need to be designed around the jets, shut off valves would have to be included to cut down on drag (think a sliding door on a super market) and of course for rapid course correction you would need a set of rockets on each limb. for the time being a set of wings will be necessary for fuel storage however the must have the capability of being jettisoned for emergencies, a secondary tank will have to provide 10 seconds of fuel for evasive maneuvering, lastly a parachute is a definite.
Wings are going to add dramatically to the size of the exoskeleton (abbreviating to exo now). Problems with wings:
Larger Target
Added Weight
Combat Risk
Problems with fuel
Added Weight from the fuel itself and the reinforcing to make it safe
Increased risk in combat
Problem with RAMjet:
Requires a decent speed to be able to be used.
Requires a supplementary engine
Added weight
Added size
Produces heat
Problem with Gas Turbine:
Added weight & size
They have a spin up period limiting their use
Noise
Rather inefficient at idle
Produces heat
Problem with rockers:
Dangerous, especially in combat
Added size and Weight
Difficult to control effectively
Produces heat
Then you actually have to be able to get them in a small enough size whilst being able to provide enough power to be able to move the Exo. at any reasonable speed or distance. Then there comes the problem of controlling it (as well as flight stability). Ailerons and flaps aren't gonna cut it because they are useless without airflow. The closes thing you are going to find is the Martin Jetpack but:
It's unarmored
Big
Low carry capacity
It is idiotic to attempt what you have suggested. It would also be dangerous to the user.
so are cars, airplanes, submarines, trains, snowboards, surfing, parajumping, rollercoasters, and training for the olympics-if you expect to have a final product in a week.
there is a disconnect here and i direct you to copenhagan suborbitals whose goal it has been for the past few years to send humans to the brink of space and return them safely.
have they done it ... no...
are they closer than when they started hellz yes
have they become more sophisticated with their designs and is their end goal more plausible and feasible than when they first started...again hellz yes
go back fifty years and tell a scientist that people in the future will be carrying computers everywhere they go and he would say "they'll throw their backs out!" their computers weighed easily 30 pounds at the most advanced.
dont jump to the end, start small start simple and grow your ideas from there