Welcome to Gaia! ::

Skye Venorum's avatar
  • 50
  • 100
  • 200
*Sigh* White wolf statted out Dracula, he combined with the originator of clan Tzimisce. Tzimisce have a pretty little discipline called Vissiscitude, the art of fleshcrafting. Wanna know how a fight would go?

Eddie: SPARKLY VAMPIRE PUNCH!
Dracula: Oh, no, I took one health level of damage. I spend a blood to heal your pitiful poke, and another blood to fleshcraft you.
Eddie: OH, NOEZ! I HAS NOT ANY ARMS, LEGS, OR DISCERNIBLE FEATURES! ON TOP OF THAT, MY BODY IS IN A BALL, AND IN THE MIDDLE ARE MY MUSCLES IN A BALL COVERED WITH WHAT WAS MY SKELETAL STRUCTURE!

And with that, Dracula would drain his Vitae, then his soul. Diablerie for the win. Game, set, match.
And two xp for the diablerie!

Sparkly vampires don't stand a chance against the real thing.
[i think edward will win blaugh
King Of Winter
The real Dracula, meaning Vlad the Impaler (who was a real person), or the great Dracula romantisized by Bram Stokker, would both kill, mutilate, disembowel, drain, destroy, and if you can think of any other word, annaihalate Edward Cullens, then move on to the rest of the Twilight cast, particuarly focusing on tearing the werewolf Jacob limb from limb.

Face it, people. The vampires penned in Twilight are cheap, pansy, glittery fakes filled with fluff. Anyone who reads books that are actually good, and that have to do with the supernatural would know this.
True vampires are not romantic. They are undead, blood-sucking creatures of the night that see humans as nothing more than food.

Now, to further this rant, I will tell what I know about vampires in literature and elsewhere, as they should be. And before you go on about how "they're not real", keep in mind that I am a firm believer in the paranormal.
There are twelve generations of vampires today, each successive generation being weaker than the one before it, but in greater numbers. The first generation consisted of a singe being. Cain, or the one who killed Able, was cursed, but at the same time found that he possessed great supernatural powers. From him, branched the second generation, and at this point, his gifts were divided between the vampires, forming "clans"

-The Lasombre had command over obtenebration and its shadowplay.
-The Gengrel had command of great physical feats, impossible to man.
-The Tzemisci inherited fleshcrafting, the ability to form bodies as they willed.
-The Assamite found great stealth, and the ability to remain undetected by the world.
-The Brujah inherited enormous strength, capable of turning mountains to dust.
-The Nosferatu inherited great strength, the ability to conceal their cursed bodies, and the command over all the animal kingdom.
-The Rahvnos developed the great power of illusion, able to kill a victim with his own mind.

Alarmingly, the second generation birthed another generation, which revolted and killed off the entire generation before itself. From that point on, all vampires were divided against eachother, into two sects.
The Sabbat, a sect that knew its superiority over the world, and recognized that they should not hide in the shadows, and that humans were mere food and nourishment.
And the Camarilla, a more secritive sect that prefered to rule the world from infiltrating our governments, but equally ruthless. Revealing oneself to be a vampire to anyone outside one's own sect was punishable by death. There was no way to hide it.
For thousands of years and over approximately a dozen vampiric generations later, the two sects have wared against on another in the shadows of our citites, the Camarillan princes often masking the conficts as "terrorist attacks" or "gang fights". When lycanthropes decided to declare war on vampires as a race, that merely served to complicate the "Masquerade Wars."


Now, about Dracula.
He would be placed as a 4th Generation Tsemisci.
In other words, a Methuselah. Without much effort on his part, he could wipe out an area the size of London in about an hour.

Stephanie Meyers attempted to make vampires romantic, and failed hilariously; instead she enraged thousands and threw kindles on a two-thousand year-old fire.

Rant over.


the focus point of your rant about what real vampires are and how their set up in clans, is EXACTLY like the table top role playing game my bros play.

though it is still a valid place to take knowledge from for such a subject and is based heavily off of the original folk lore of vampires, you should still focus on all of the vampeiric folk lore from medival times rather than a modern day game. if you focus on what the game says then you will only have a diluted veiw of the material.
dracula wi;ll win edward is a pose =_=
bipolar redundance
*Sigh* White wolf statted out Dracula, he combined with the originator of clan Tzimisce. Tzimisce have a pretty little discipline called Vissiscitude, the art of fleshcrafting. Wanna know how a fight would go?

Eddie: SPARKLY VAMPIRE PUNCH!
Dracula: Oh, no, I took one health level of damage. I spend a blood to heal your pitiful poke, and another blood to fleshcraft you.
Eddie: OH, NOEZ! I HAS NOT ANY ARMS, LEGS, OR DISCERNIBLE FEATURES! ON TOP OF THAT, MY BODY IS IN A BALL, AND IN THE MIDDLE ARE MY MUSCLES IN A BALL COVERED WITH WHAT WAS MY SKELETAL STRUCTURE!

And with that, Dracula would drain his Vitae, then his soul. Diablerie for the win. Game, set, match.
And two xp for the diablerie!

Sparkly vampires don't stand a chance against the real thing.


and yet again, another post that focuses on the "masquerade" game rather than the medival folk lore.

though i do agree that dracula would win, people should stop focusing on the modern day games that ivolve vampires and more on the original folk lore.

the orginal stroies were awsome and i hate how all people can talk about that involves vampires is the diluted variations from the modern day stories.
Goth Super Sayin
King Of Winter
The real Dracula, meaning Vlad the Impaler (who was a real person), or the great Dracula romantisized by Bram Stokker, would both kill, mutilate, disembowel, drain, destroy, and if you can think of any other word, annaihalate Edward Cullens, then move on to the rest of the Twilight cast, particuarly focusing on tearing the werewolf Jacob limb from limb.

Face it, people. The vampires penned in Twilight are cheap, pansy, glittery fakes filled with fluff. Anyone who reads books that are actually good, and that have to do with the supernatural would know this.
True vampires are not romantic. They are undead, blood-sucking creatures of the night that see humans as nothing more than food.

Now, to further this rant, I will tell what I know about vampires in literature and elsewhere, as they should be. And before you go on about how "they're not real", keep in mind that I am a firm believer in the paranormal.
There are twelve generations of vampires today, each successive generation being weaker than the one before it, but in greater numbers. The first generation consisted of a singe being. Cain, or the one who killed Able, was cursed, but at the same time found that he possessed great supernatural powers. From him, branched the second generation, and at this point, his gifts were divided between the vampires, forming "clans"

-The Lasombre had command over obtenebration and its shadowplay.
-The Gengrel had command of great physical feats, impossible to man.
-The Tzemisci inherited fleshcrafting, the ability to form bodies as they willed.
-The Assamite found great stealth, and the ability to remain undetected by the world.
-The Brujah inherited enormous strength, capable of turning mountains to dust.
-The Nosferatu inherited great strength, the ability to conceal their cursed bodies, and the command over all the animal kingdom.
-The Rahvnos developed the great power of illusion, able to kill a victim with his own mind.

Alarmingly, the second generation birthed another generation, which revolted and killed off the entire generation before itself. From that point on, all vampires were divided against eachother, into two sects.
The Sabbat, a sect that knew its superiority over the world, and recognized that they should not hide in the shadows, and that humans were mere food and nourishment.
And the Camarilla, a more secritive sect that prefered to rule the world from infiltrating our governments, but equally ruthless. Revealing oneself to be a vampire to anyone outside one's own sect was punishable by death. There was no way to hide it.
For thousands of years and over approximately a dozen vampiric generations later, the two sects have wared against on another in the shadows of our citites, the Camarillan princes often masking the conficts as "terrorist attacks" or "gang fights". When lycanthropes decided to declare war on vampires as a race, that merely served to complicate the "Masquerade Wars."


Now, about Dracula.
He would be placed as a 4th Generation Tsemisci.
In other words, a Methuselah. Without much effort on his part, he could wipe out an area the size of London in about an hour.

Stephanie Meyers attempted to make vampires romantic, and failed hilariously; instead she enraged thousands and threw kindles on a two-thousand year-old fire.

Rant over.


the focus point of your rant about what real vampires are and how their set up in clans, is EXACTLY like the table top role playing game my bros play.

though it is still a valid place to take knowledge from for such a subject and is based heavily off of the original folk lore of vampires, you should still focus on all of the vampeiric folk lore from medival times rather than a modern day game. if you focus on what the game says then you will only have a diluted veiw of the material.
That was the point. Did you know that the game is based off of the real folklore?

I used to play the game, but I haven't for about a year, instead focusing on the actual legends. I found the similarities striking when it comes to the origins.


Also, if you're ever read Bram Stokker's Dracula, you'd see even more that we're basing off of far more than just the game.
King Of Winter
Goth Super Sayin
King Of Winter
The real Dracula, meaning Vlad the Impaler (who was a real person), or the great Dracula romantisized by Bram Stokker, would both kill, mutilate, disembowel, drain, destroy, and if you can think of any other word, annaihalate Edward Cullens, then move on to the rest of the Twilight cast, particuarly focusing on tearing the werewolf Jacob limb from limb.

Face it, people. The vampires penned in Twilight are cheap, pansy, glittery fakes filled with fluff. Anyone who reads books that are actually good, and that have to do with the supernatural would know this.
True vampires are not romantic. They are undead, blood-sucking creatures of the night that see humans as nothing more than food.

Now, to further this rant, I will tell what I know about vampires in literature and elsewhere, as they should be. And before you go on about how "they're not real", keep in mind that I am a firm believer in the paranormal.
There are twelve generations of vampires today, each successive generation being weaker than the one before it, but in greater numbers. The first generation consisted of a singe being. Cain, or the one who killed Able, was cursed, but at the same time found that he possessed great supernatural powers. From him, branched the second generation, and at this point, his gifts were divided between the vampires, forming "clans"

-The Lasombre had command over obtenebration and its shadowplay.
-The Gengrel had command of great physical feats, impossible to man.
-The Tzemisci inherited fleshcrafting, the ability to form bodies as they willed.
-The Assamite found great stealth, and the ability to remain undetected by the world.
-The Brujah inherited enormous strength, capable of turning mountains to dust.
-The Nosferatu inherited great strength, the ability to conceal their cursed bodies, and the command over all the animal kingdom.
-The Rahvnos developed the great power of illusion, able to kill a victim with his own mind.

Alarmingly, the second generation birthed another generation, which revolted and killed off the entire generation before itself. From that point on, all vampires were divided against eachother, into two sects.
The Sabbat, a sect that knew its superiority over the world, and recognized that they should not hide in the shadows, and that humans were mere food and nourishment.
And the Camarilla, a more secritive sect that prefered to rule the world from infiltrating our governments, but equally ruthless. Revealing oneself to be a vampire to anyone outside one's own sect was punishable by death. There was no way to hide it.
For thousands of years and over approximately a dozen vampiric generations later, the two sects have wared against on another in the shadows of our citites, the Camarillan princes often masking the conficts as "terrorist attacks" or "gang fights". When lycanthropes decided to declare war on vampires as a race, that merely served to complicate the "Masquerade Wars."


Now, about Dracula.
He would be placed as a 4th Generation Tsemisci.
In other words, a Methuselah. Without much effort on his part, he could wipe out an area the size of London in about an hour.

Stephanie Meyers attempted to make vampires romantic, and failed hilariously; instead she enraged thousands and threw kindles on a two-thousand year-old fire.

Rant over.


the focus point of your rant about what real vampires are and how their set up in clans, is EXACTLY like the table top role playing game my bros play.

though it is still a valid place to take knowledge from for such a subject and is based heavily off of the original folk lore of vampires, you should still focus on all of the vampeiric folk lore from medival times rather than a modern day game. if you focus on what the game says then you will only have a diluted veiw of the material.
That was the point. Did you know that the game is based off of the real folklore?

I used to play the game, but I haven't for about a year, instead focusing on the actual legends. I found the similarities striking when it comes to the origins.


Also, if you're ever read Bram Stokker's Dracula, you'd see even more that we're basing off of far more than just the game.


i stated that the game was based off of the folk lore in that post and futher more, here is a statment you seemed to miss from it as well....

"if you focus on what the game says then you will only have a diluted veiw of the material."
luvly_azn_dudette
Edward!


i have but a simple question :

what is the logic behind saying Edward would win in a FIGHT between him and dracula?
xXshinn_luXx's avatar
  • 200
  • 100
  • 100
edward is going o win so bad biggrin
touvidy1
edward is going o win so bad biggrin


what is the logic behind saying Edward would win in a FIGHT between him and dracula?
Goth Super Sayin
King Of Winter
Goth Super Sayin
King Of Winter
The real Dracula, meaning Vlad the Impaler (who was a real person), or the great Dracula romantisized by Bram Stokker, would both kill, mutilate, disembowel, drain, destroy, and if you can think of any other word, annaihalate Edward Cullens, then move on to the rest of the Twilight cast, particuarly focusing on tearing the werewolf Jacob limb from limb.

Face it, people. The vampires penned in Twilight are cheap, pansy, glittery fakes filled with fluff. Anyone who reads books that are actually good, and that have to do with the supernatural would know this.
True vampires are not romantic. They are undead, blood-sucking creatures of the night that see humans as nothing more than food.

Now, to further this rant, I will tell what I know about vampires in literature and elsewhere, as they should be. And before you go on about how "they're not real", keep in mind that I am a firm believer in the paranormal.
There are twelve generations of vampires today, each successive generation being weaker than the one before it, but in greater numbers. The first generation consisted of a singe being. Cain, or the one who killed Able, was cursed, but at the same time found that he possessed great supernatural powers. From him, branched the second generation, and at this point, his gifts were divided between the vampires, forming "clans"

-The Lasombre had command over obtenebration and its shadowplay.
-The Gengrel had command of great physical feats, impossible to man.
-The Tzemisci inherited fleshcrafting, the ability to form bodies as they willed.
-The Assamite found great stealth, and the ability to remain undetected by the world.
-The Brujah inherited enormous strength, capable of turning mountains to dust.
-The Nosferatu inherited great strength, the ability to conceal their cursed bodies, and the command over all the animal kingdom.
-The Rahvnos developed the great power of illusion, able to kill a victim with his own mind.

Alarmingly, the second generation birthed another generation, which revolted and killed off the entire generation before itself. From that point on, all vampires were divided against eachother, into two sects.
The Sabbat, a sect that knew its superiority over the world, and recognized that they should not hide in the shadows, and that humans were mere food and nourishment.
And the Camarilla, a more secritive sect that prefered to rule the world from infiltrating our governments, but equally ruthless. Revealing oneself to be a vampire to anyone outside one's own sect was punishable by death. There was no way to hide it.
For thousands of years and over approximately a dozen vampiric generations later, the two sects have wared against on another in the shadows of our citites, the Camarillan princes often masking the conficts as "terrorist attacks" or "gang fights". When lycanthropes decided to declare war on vampires as a race, that merely served to complicate the "Masquerade Wars."


Now, about Dracula.
He would be placed as a 4th Generation Tsemisci.
In other words, a Methuselah. Without much effort on his part, he could wipe out an area the size of London in about an hour.

Stephanie Meyers attempted to make vampires romantic, and failed hilariously; instead she enraged thousands and threw kindles on a two-thousand year-old fire.

Rant over.


the focus point of your rant about what real vampires are and how their set up in clans, is EXACTLY like the table top role playing game my bros play.

though it is still a valid place to take knowledge from for such a subject and is based heavily off of the original folk lore of vampires, you should still focus on all of the vampeiric folk lore from medival times rather than a modern day game. if you focus on what the game says then you will only have a diluted veiw of the material.
That was the point. Did you know that the game is based off of the real folklore?

I used to play the game, but I haven't for about a year, instead focusing on the actual legends. I found the similarities striking when it comes to the origins.


Also, if you're ever read Bram Stokker's Dracula, you'd see even more that we're basing off of far more than just the game.


i stated that the game was based off of the folk lore in that post and futher more, here is a statment you seemed to miss from it as well....

"if you focus on what the game says then you will only have a diluted veiw of the material."

Well, the only way to get the true scripts on vampires, untainted by time, is to actually read the Gromich manuscripst....but they're lost, after the real dracula was supposedly killed. I have been wanting to visit Vlad the Impaler (the real dracula)'s castle though...I hear that there are some clues there hinting at the history of vampires.

While I readily admit that my explaination is diluted, it is by time and by the telephone game effect. I just wanted to give as detailed and close a description as I could to the most probable history.
Goth Super Sayin
touvidy1
edward is going o win so bad biggrin


what is the logic behind saying Edward would win in a FIGHT between him and dracula?
Her logic is the fail-logic of an Edward Cullen fangirl. They fall for the sparklyness.


Which would be hilarious is a fight.
dracula of course edward is a p***y
EDWARD burning_eyes

Quick Reply

Submit
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get Items
Get Gaia Cash
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff