Which Vampire Will Win:Edward or Dracula

[HariChi]

edward

[Celestial_Valkyri]

Dracula

[Goth Super Sayin]

Mystchevious

Goth Super Sayin

lavagurl2955

Edward. Totally Edward. Dracula's cool and all but he has way more weaknesses.
For example...

Edward:Can only die in you chop him up in pieces and burn it. (Which will never NEVER happen)

Dracula: Sun, garlic, I think cross, removing his heart or a knife or some thing pointy through it, and since he has blood Edward can shuck it all out, and ect.

PS: And shut up scourge 666, Edward isn't guy, he's classic. And Edward is a vampire, who the hell said he wasn't? plus it isn't a show, it's a book/movie. And who ever likes him is a smart person and not the a** hole your being. xp

do to the amount of human blood dracula has absorbed, the only thing that can kill him or even hurt him is a holy warrior and vampires can NOT become holy in any way.

dracula is the king of vampires and has several godmoding capabilities, one of them being complete control over ALL other vampires.

therefore dracula wins.

the only two that could even scratch him is raziel from soul reaver and aros from twilight (if they were working together), because raziel was kill as a vampire and a cuthulian gave him his life back as a nether realm specter of some sort and aros because of his psionic sheild item

though it all depends if his sheild has a strong enough psionic level to protect him from draculas control.



cuthulian : either cuthulu himself or one of "its" offspring that he controls

nether realm specter : a supernatural creature that feeds on pure souls and can have a wide variety of abilities, usually working for another higher supernatural being

psionic item : any item with a psionic enchantment that gives it an ability not normal to its original form or state.


yeah.... i did my phukking research before i claimed a posible winner for this one, not necesarily a definit victor though.

Truth be told in a contest between Dracula and Edward Edward would "win".

Edward is a pretty boy vampire with above average physical traits and the ability to exist in sunlight right?

Dracula depending on your mythos is a several thousand year old trained war vetran who commands Legions of werewolves, wolves, and other assorted creatures of the night. Well educated and versed in knowledge from all the era's he's lived in with a financial backing that makes even Bill Gates take a double take.

I know what your thinking. I'm being sarchastic. NO really Edward would "Win" Because the instant we knew Dracula existed we'd hunt him to the ends of the freaking earth. Drak would morph into myst giving the illusion of death allowing Edward to garner all the publicity until some raunchy tween with blond hair and a stake called Mr. Pointy, put him in the ground for good. Drak always comes back. Why? Because he's not just smart he's legendary...

you barely read any of what i said. dracula has more than just knowledge and control over werewolves, he has hundreds of GODMODDING psionic abilities.

edward is just a normal vampire, not even a bruha or noesvuratu, just a normal vampire and his ablity to live in sunlight is a load of s**t if he is as nice as they portray him in the movie and book because he would have had to drink massive amounts of human blood in oder to stay alive in sunlight.

dracula is what you would call a "demi-god" because of his powers and how long he has lived in order to obtain them. i have stated a posible winnig TEAM, but even with raziel and aros, a behlmont would just bust in at the last second and kill all three of them by surprize.

he'd first get raziel with a holy water vile, banishing him to the nether realm for a short time, then he would wrap dracula in his holy whip while throwwing a cross boomerang passed aros and then ocupie him from the front with his blade while the cross comes back around catching him in the back, dracula would finaly break the holy whip and then the rest is all to chance with victor behlmont having a descent advantage.

no one but a holy warrior can DEFEAT dracula and even still, dracula will come back any way.


this is NOT a contest of cuteness, it is a contest of ability and strength.

[Doctor Tennant]

dracula without a doubt he could beat edward in the daytime all he would have to do is when he started to catch fire he tackles sparkly boy over there so he catches fire too

[Nikkiyoko]

Dracula

[Bunni Geisha]

I will say one more thing....

Neither would win. Why? Cause neither exist. People say Edward isn't a REAL vampire. Well neither is Dracula. They're both made up.

The End.

[Jeani_Kellers]

Edward IF he is NOT played by robert pattinson! He sux

Other wise dracula will win hands down...

[Billy M Lives In My Pants]

Dracula twilight is for fagzzzzzzzzzz the i tagz

[Bloom Mousy]

Pfft, like there needs to be an explaination: Dracula.

[aviandrea]

How can you say that you can't compare the two?! They're both vampires!

And Dracula would kick his sissy a** and then drink his blood, in complete darkness.

[red_bodow]

Taki Arika

KiikeRapist

First of all, Vamps CAN exist in sunlight...they neither burn nor rot in the sunlight. Contrary to popular belief...Vamps obtain their life energy FROM the sun...much like plants and Fotosynthesis, but are rather weak in this process and endure this phase through sleep, absorbing the Suns energy through the heat in the ground, (reason why they need soil wherever they reside).

Excuse me, but where did this idea come from?
Vampires can exist in sunlight, yes (it was Hollywood that made up the sunlight-is-lethal crap), but vampires obtain their 'life' energy from blood...that's why they're vampires.
If they obtained it from the sun, all they would need is a day at the beach, not a living person to drain dry.

I sent a profile comment to discuss this, hope u don't mind.

[red_bodow]

Bunni Geisha

I will say one more thing....

Neither would win. Why? Cause neither exist. People say Edward isn't a REAL vampire. Well neither is Dracula. They're both made up.

The End.

Actually, Dracula is a character based off a real person, if not more than one. I.E Vlad Tepes

He may not BE one of those people...but a Dracula does exist, nevertheless.

He may not be named Dracula anymore...or maybe never was...but Vamps do exists, and therefore...there has to have been a first vamp to begin with: referred to as Dracula

[bad dog 2 good]

dracula 3nodding

[Frydae XIII]

So Dracula. Edward has only brute force while Dracula has a whole array of other powers.

[Goth Super Sayin]

Taki Arika

KiikeRapist

First of all, Vamps CAN exist in sunlight...they neither burn nor rot in the sunlight. Contrary to popular belief...Vamps obtain their life energy FROM the sun...much like plants and Fotosynthesis, but are rather weak in this process and endure this phase through sleep, absorbing the Suns energy through the heat in the ground, (reason why they need soil wherever they reside).

Excuse me, but where did this idea come from?
Vampires can exist in sunlight, yes (it was Hollywood that made up the sunlight-is-lethal crap), but vampires obtain their 'life' energy from blood...that's why they're vampires.
If they obtained it from the sun, all they would need is a day at the beach, not a living person to drain dry.

in the first folk lore about vampires there was a man named kane (not "kain" from soul reaver) he killed his brother by tieing him up and drinking his blood as a form of saidism, then while he was still enraged from killing them he went out and commited just about every sin there is and was cursed to never walk in day light because of the darkness in his heart. dracula comes along later and claims him self as the king of all vampires because kane is killed by a holy warrior (no, not a behlmont. just a normal priest whos not afriad to kick some a**) and he gains control over all other vampires when this happens.

read more of the folk lore before you claim a winner or talk about what vampires "real" abilities are.