|
|
|
 |
Sybil Unrest Jesus, this thread got restarted? Just let it die, already. There are already forums devoted entirely to "vampires", go post there.
I disagree with the term "vampire". Simply because you don't fit the definition. If you're not undead, then you're not a vampire, sorry.
And I read the OP, saying that the term has "just stuck" and so you can't get rid of it. Newsflash: yes, you can. Choose a more accurate term - blood/energy feeder, "bloodist" like that woman at Vampiric Studies uses, or even sanguisuga, if you want to be fancy. Choose a term, and start using it - rather than just saying "oh, we can't do that, the community calls themselves vampires...blah blah". You too are part of the community, start changing stuff.
At least be accurate. I suspect that there has been little effort to change the term used because vampires are "cool" and it attracts followers.
Why should we let the thread die? We want to post here and have every reason to do so, we're trying to run this little thread as a support thread for the psis and sangs out there.
So by your defintition, vampire bats and darwin finches are undead bats and undead birds because vampires have to be undead....
Personally I use the terms sanguine and psion but not everyone does, sanguivore is another term in use but not many people like using it.
|
|
| |
|
|