tererun3
Offline
Post: 55678517_46 created on Sat Oct 31, 2009 4:01 amPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 4:01 am
 |
The Figure 13 tererun3 The Figure 13 tererun3 The Figure 13 • Shapeshifters (Wolves) stolen from Harry Potter Stolen from harry potter? Harry ******** potter? Are you serious? You are talking about the story of wizards, ogres, witches, and other creatures that is totally ripped off from other good literature of the past? About the only thing original about harry potter is a wizard with a lame a** name like harry. Most things are not original in this world, but at least do not use a POS piece of literary garbage made for elementary school readers with lame a** characters to go after it. Just stop mentioning Harry Potter as original and good. It is a pop up book without the pictures. You clearly don't like Harry Potter. I don't care that is your choice. But it is merely a reference and the only one that I can think of at the time. It may not be correct though, there are other more suitable ones I could've used but didn't cause I didn't think of them at the time. Look, my like or dislike of Harry Potter aside, it certainly is not original or advanced literature. I will admit twilight is about the same idea as most other vampire literature and certainly not written with flowing literary prose that is above an elementary school reading level, but to use a book that is written for little children and uses common literary tools like wizards, wands, and ugly monsters is like bashing McDonalds for being unhealthy using Taco Bell as your example. If you are going to use 20th century literature at least use something like tolkien. However, even that is a copy of works of the past that had things like wizards and dragons and things like arthurian heroes. When you are going to go after something like twilight from an intellectual point of view it would be good of you to be intellectual and use some good references. Otherwise you come off as one of the more ignorant twilight haters who have no real business being bothered at the intellectual levels of twilight, or because it uses a common pretext like vampires and werewolves. Really, what were you thinking? My advice to you is to stop thinking that Harry Potter is decent literature and recognize it is just as fluffy and copies as twilight, only the author raped you for many more books, crappy toys, and will force you to pay for at least 7 crappy movies based on one of the most daft and annoying dimwitted hero ever to annoy us in a book. I have read both, and although twilight is fluffy, how the hell did you read about the supposedly most powerful wizard ever who doesn't have a clue about anything? You would think a vastly powerful wizard might get a backbone or a clue by the end of 7 ******** books. You just want to smack the little b***h, and you end up rooting for him to be anally raped for being so perfectly useless as a hero. You clearly didn't read the entire OP go back and read it carefully and I just said Harry Potter is a more well known source, and the stolen aspect in that book further proves my point that Meyer isn't original as she is using ideas of ideas to further push romantic drivel down the throats of so many young girls and middle aged housewives. Again, I will tell you that if you read books you would find that there is very little of what you would call original. The vampire motif stretches back for centuries and probably everything you have actually read about vampires is based off of older stories. Your complaint is irrelevant if you read pretty much anything from the 20th century. Even ancient races were drawing pictures of things like animal monsters and telling stories of things that would suck the life out of you. Your complaint is focussed on a single writer that does what every other writer does. So, really you are just pissy about twilight, and I have to wonder the real reason why? It really seems like twilight doesn't copy the vampire theme in a way you like. I don't hear you bitching about Ann Rice, or the 8 billion copies of the vampire legends that exist. So, really you just dislike twilight which makes you a pointless hater with no real purpose. That is just as bad as being a rabid fangirl who squeels every time you say edward. I you stop reading things that are not completely original you would stop reading. The fact that you seem to think Harry Potter is great only amplifies your complete hypocricy. |
|
I used to be a republican, but I grew a brain
I used to be a democrat, but I grew a spine
I used to be a libertarian, but I pulled my head out of my a**
Declaring full on SPNAK! on Macai
I used to be a democrat, but I grew a spine
I used to be a libertarian, but I pulled my head out of my a**
Declaring full on SPNAK! on Macai
