What is it massachusetts
Horace Burtons Ghost
It is there to make money. A shitload in fact.
Labels wanting to make money, what's next, that you deduced the sky is blue.
No, I am not a scientist, and would never make such a claim. Especially at dusk.
This particular topic is all about naming bands that are 'boring'. I would argue that this has more to do with the label, than it has to do with a groups artistic merit. There would be a certain amount of struggle, you could agree, that any particular band, may have to keep churning out the same old stuff, so as to keep record sales up, rather than taking the risk of 'evolving'. This is where my point on record executives would have a vested interest in keeping a group doin the same ol stuff.
I would also assume, this sort of stuff is written into the contracts. A would doubt there would be many groups that would have a say as to whether their song is used in an haemorroid commercial, or some lame rom/com.
There are very few anthology's of many groups, that you could see diversity in their music, without maintaining their high level of fame and fortune.