If you are against gay marriage, you are a bad Christian.

[Oblivious Sage]

John Calvin

tylara67

According to who? I'm sure the employees of Krispy Kreme would disagree with you.

Or, you know, they could agree. Employee of certain place =/= advocating.

True, but it usually implies you don't advocate a counter-position. People who hate oil companies don't usually work for oil companies, people who hate guns don't usually own gun shops, and pro-lifers don't generally work at abortion clinics.

[linaloki]

Servus Dei

linaloki

How about... breathing?

You shouldn't be polluting my air with your Carbon Dioxide, dammit.

Please prove that you own the air, or are at least more entitled to it than others? My guess is that, in actuality, you're polluting MY air.

[Ananel]

Servus Dei

Marshal67

Seemed rather strong to me. Everytime someone gives an analagy you claim to be weak.

There is a vast difference between not having sex and thus not having children...and a man boning another man in the a**.

Not if, as you have in the past, you treat "Be fruitful and multiply" in any way as a command or ordinance.

[Servus Dei]

Marshal67

Because that was the hinge of the analagy.

If the analogy is hinging on outcomes, then it's missing the point entirely.

[linaloki]

Servus Dei

linaloki

And what about a man boning a woman in the a**?

When have you ever seen me condoning a man boning a woman in the a**?

I've never seen you do anything except troll thus far.

But is that okay? A man boning a woman in the a**? You're avoiding the question.

[Servus Dei]

Ananel

Not if, as you have in the past, you treat "Be fruitful and multiply" in any way as a command or ordinance.

Didn't you know that the Bible is just a cookbook? What the verse REALLY says is "Add berry fruit fill and/or multiply"

But seriously, was YHWH talking to individuals or populations?

[Half Baked SF]

Servus Dei

Marshal67

Because that was the hinge of the analagy.

If the analogy is hinging on outcomes, then it's missing the point entirely.

It's not the only thing missing the point.

[Servus Dei]

linaloki

I've never seen you do anything except troll thus far.

Trolling is such a subject term.

Quote:

But is that okay? A man boning a woman in the a**? You're avoiding the question.

No, I don't think it's alright for a man to bone a woman in the a**, unless the man switches from the a** to the v****a some time before he ejaculates, presuming the couple is married, and I just think that's friggen gross.

[Marshal67]

Servus Dei

Ananel

Not if, as you have in the past, you treat "Be fruitful and multiply" in any way as a command or ordinance.

Didn't you know that the Bible is just a cookbook? What the verse REALLY says is "Add berry fruit fill and/or multiply"

But seriously, was YHWH talking to individuals or populations?

My guess, is the general population. To command child bearing, seems ridiculous to me, and from the Personality of YHVH I got from reading the Bible, just does not seem like something He would do.

[Half Baked SF]

Servus Dei

Ananel

Not if, as you have in the past, you treat "Be fruitful and multiply" in any way as a command or ordinance.

Didn't you know that the Bible is just a cookbook? What the verse REALLY says is "Add berry fruit fill and/or multiply"

But seriously, was YHWH talking to individuals or populations?

In that verse? Two individuals. Only. I swear.

[Jewel Turner]

Posting a few verses for whoever cares to look them up. If anyone wants to reply to this, please send it to me in pm, and I'll be back on Gaia tommorrow.

Romans 1: 24-27

Leviticus 18: 22

Leviticus 20: 13

1 Corinthians 6: 9-11


I am not trying to force my beliefs or views on you by trying to post these verses. They are only there for people to read and consider by their own choice.

Well, I am off to bed now... see ya'll!

[Ananel]

Servus Dei

Ananel

Not if, as you have in the past, you treat "Be fruitful and multiply" in any way as a command or ordinance.

Didn't you know that the Bible is just a cookbook? What the verse REALLY says is "Add berry fruit fill and/or multiply"

But seriously, was YHWH talking to individuals or populations?

Populations were lacking, and you tend to speak of universals established as ordinances in Genesis 1-3, indicative of 'population' inplications. Given that I consider it, grammatically speaking, to be a blessing to two individuals, I would say you tend to stretch the text.

...and I'm waiting for you to recall that I replied to you twice now.

[Servus Dei]

Marshal67

My guess, is the general population.

Nuff said.

[Half Baked SF]

Servus Dei

Marshal67

My guess, is the general population.

Nuff said.

If "Be fruitful and multiply" applies to all mean that makes Jesus a sinner. Which was my original point.

[Servus Dei]

Ananel

Populations were lacking, and you tend to speak of universals established as ordinances in Genesis 1-3, indicative of 'population' inplications. Given that I consider it, grammatically speaking, to be a blessing to two individuals, I would say you tend to stretch the text.

Huh? I have no idea what you just said.

Quote:

...and I'm waiting for you to recall that I replied to you twice now.

I didn't see. Where?