TheGreatestSage
I am not disappointed the streak was broken. I just wish it had been someone other than Lesner. I mean, there was no buildup; no story aside the one Heyman gave. If they even gave more effort to a budding rivalry between Lesner and Undertaker I would have been fine with it.
The only way they can salvage this...kind of, is if they made Heyman come out, and claim he was the one who broke the streak instead of Lesner, siting his managing of CM Punk last year, then of Lesner. Make him say something like, "CM Punk could not get the job done, so I enlisted the one man who can, and thus, I ended the streak of the Undertaker."
Shoot, I'd rather Cena have taken the win than Lesner. It would make the most sense aside CM Punk. D-Bry could have worked, Sheamus even, and honestly, I see that also be a reward to Bray Wyatt too as a passing of the torch from one monster to another...
But no, we got Brock Lesner, who cares more about the paycheck and endorsements than the WWE or its fans.
Heyman actually did say that he got Lesnar because Punk couldn't get the job done. I think it was in Chicago when he said it.
But I think what you'll see tonight is Taker coming out, saying his goodbyes (still as Taker), and then Heyman and Brock come out to mock him. Taker says he knows one man who can take Lesnar down, and that man ends up being Sting. Sting goes over on Lesnar at next year's Mania, giving him his WM moment, a decent WM match (cause let's face it...though Sting's older, he's in better shape), and then Sting ends his career with the WWE...goes in the HoF probably the next year. But yeah, that's what I think will happen, and I almost prefer that to a Taker/Sting match, especially after how bad Taker looked this year.
50
500
200
