www.911truth.org

Do you believe 911 was a hoaX?

Yes.	29.8%	[ 31 ]
No	70.2%	[ 73 ]
Total Votes:			[ 104 ]

[Dark the Angel]

pockybot

Dark the Angel

Our government a lot of times isn't looking out for the best interest of their soldiers or people, just their pockets. Possibly few rare changes they try to help them out, usually instead of helping out changing a tire, they set one's car on fire.

Wait, I thought I was the conspiracy theorist? heh

Also, where did I ever say I thought Bush and Cheney and Rice were behind 9/11?

Questioning 9/11 does not = OMG BUSH DID IT!

How is it conspiracy to say our government is corrupt? Observational opinion due to the fact of them failing us time and time again. But I guess opinions can't be facts, schucks.

I never mentioned anything of Rice, so I have to guess you have a strong biased opinion against her as well as Bush and "Lord" Cheney.

I'll agree with the last part, but this still doesn't convince me there was any strange dealings with 9/11 expect on the part of the hijackers.

[Yojimbo_sureibu]

Ash_Strife

Yojimbo_sureibu

CommandoDude

WTC 7 was positioned 300 ft (Only a foot ball fields distance) away from the North Tower

When the North Tower collapsed do you know how much falling debris hit WTC 7? It ******** obliterated the south side of the entire building.

Falling debris heavily damaged WTC 7 and started a catastrophic fire that burned all afternoon through the unique structure of WTC 7.


....AND YOU EXPECT IT TO KEEP STANDING?

Not only that, but the Pentagon is built from i-don't-know how many inches thick of reinforced concrete That's concrete with steel intertwining inside of it BTW.

Just to let you know, so obviously there is going to be a different effect on a building made from steel then one made of Reinforced Concrete.

Okay, concrete building, steel tower... I still think a ower made of steel would win, but it didn't di it? And world trade center 7 was father then other buildings, like the other centers. how come the buildings much closer around the area of the incident did not become completly demolished. And are you saying, more debris travled farther, and did more damage to the football field distanced building, then the buildings standing right next to the WTC?

Do your research. All of the WTC buildings were damaged beyond repair. The ones that weren't destroyed on 9/11 were demolished later because the damage was too great.

Damaged beyond repair, completly destroyed into pieces... uh, your point?

[Yojimbo_sureibu]

agrab0ekim

Yojimbo_sureibu

CommandoDude

WTC 7 was positioned 300 ft (Only a foot ball fields distance) away from the North Tower

When the North Tower collapsed do you know how much falling debris hit WTC 7? It ******** obliterated the south side of the entire building.

Falling debris heavily damaged WTC 7 and started a catastrophic fire that burned all afternoon through the unique structure of WTC 7.


....AND YOU EXPECT IT TO KEEP STANDING?

Not only that, but the Pentagon is built from i-don't-know how many inches thick of reinforced concrete That's concrete with steel intertwining inside of it BTW.

Just to let you know, so obviously there is going to be a different effect on a building made from steel then one made of Reinforced Concrete.

Okay, concrete building, steel tower... I still think a ower made of steel would win, but it didn't di it? And world trade center 7 was father then other buildings, like the other centers. how come the buildings much closer around the area of the incident did not become completly demolished. And are you saying, more debris travled farther, and did more damage to the football field distanced building, then the buildings standing right next to the WTC?

steel is stronger than regular concrete, and sometimes than reinforced concrete, but once it is heated, it is weaker than my hammer

design layout was more than debris the issue

And then that would create nice blunt damage, melting, not snaps like carrot sticks like these cores right?



Thirteen seconds people, 13 for the entire building to fall.

[Maha the Wizard]

Yojimbo_sureibu

agrab0ekim

Yojimbo_sureibu

CommandoDude

WTC 7 was positioned 300 ft (Only a foot ball fields distance) away from the North Tower

When the North Tower collapsed do you know how much falling debris hit WTC 7? It ******** obliterated the south side of the entire building.

Falling debris heavily damaged WTC 7 and started a catastrophic fire that burned all afternoon through the unique structure of WTC 7.


....AND YOU EXPECT IT TO KEEP STANDING?

Not only that, but the Pentagon is built from i-don't-know how many inches thick of reinforced concrete That's concrete with steel intertwining inside of it BTW.

Just to let you know, so obviously there is going to be a different effect on a building made from steel then one made of Reinforced Concrete.

Okay, concrete building, steel tower... I still think a ower made of steel would win, but it didn't di it? And world trade center 7 was father then other buildings, like the other centers. how come the buildings much closer around the area of the incident did not become completly demolished. And are you saying, more debris travled farther, and did more damage to the football field distanced building, then the buildings standing right next to the WTC?

steel is stronger than regular concrete, and sometimes than reinforced concrete, but once it is heated, it is weaker than my hammer

design layout was more than debris the issue

And then that would create nice blunt damage, melting, not snaps like carrot sticks like these cores right?



Thirteen seconds people, 13 for the entire building to fall.

Look at my post on page 16.

[agrab0ekim]

Yojimbo_sureibu

agrab0ekim

Yojimbo_sureibu

CommandoDude

WTC 7 was positioned 300 ft (Only a foot ball fields distance) away from the North Tower

When the North Tower collapsed do you know how much falling debris hit WTC 7? It ******** obliterated the south side of the entire building.

Falling debris heavily damaged WTC 7 and started a catastrophic fire that burned all afternoon through the unique structure of WTC 7.


....AND YOU EXPECT IT TO KEEP STANDING?

Not only that, but the Pentagon is built from i-don't-know how many inches thick of reinforced concrete That's concrete with steel intertwining inside of it BTW.

Just to let you know, so obviously there is going to be a different effect on a building made from steel then one made of Reinforced Concrete.

Okay, concrete building, steel tower... I still think a ower made of steel would win, but it didn't di it? And world trade center 7 was father then other buildings, like the other centers. how come the buildings much closer around the area of the incident did not become completly demolished. And are you saying, more debris travled farther, and did more damage to the football field distanced building, then the buildings standing right next to the WTC?

steel is stronger than regular concrete, and sometimes than reinforced concrete, but once it is heated, it is weaker than my hammer

design layout was more than debris the issue

And then that would create nice blunt damage, melting, not snaps like carrot sticks like these cores right?



Thirteen seconds people, 13 for the entire building to fall.

it would follow the same principle as a controlled demo
if the heat effects the internal skeleton, at the point one beam fails the whole building will collapse based on the change in the actuall pressure that is excerted upon the lower layers

[Breanne1024]

katanadude

I highly doubt that out of 280,000,000 people in the U.S 98% believe their own country did it. That sounds like a bold face lie.
-edit

I agree with katanadude! It does sound like a bold face lie!!! Why would people blame it on there own country! By your "proof" I didn't get any proof from it!

[MAUREENASAURUS]

Aramek4

LOL. agreed. Me no likey bush.

[Revus]