Quote:
Your second source addresses it this way:
Quote:
12. What is the role of women, minority, and veteran entrepreneurs?
Hispanic Americans owned 8.3 percent of all U.S. businesses
Note the difference there. Not all immigrants are counted as minorities. You can tell that because there was no break-down into europeans, New Zealanders, Canadians, etc.
Are you legitimately stupid, or are you just lying to hold on to your argument? Let's refresh your memory. Ban states that immigrants make a disproportionate amount of small business owners, using
this article, and using the second as the source to show that small businesses create jobs. You lie, and pretend like the second link is sourcing the claim about immigrants and small business, and try to cite this
"Of the 27.1 million nonfarm businesses in 2007, women owned 7.8 million businesses, which generated $1.2 trillion in revenues, employed 7.6 million workers, and paid $218 billion in payroll. Another 4.6 million firms were were 50 percent woman owned. Minorities owned 5.8 million firms, which generated $1 trillion in revenues and employed 5.9 million people. Hispanic Americans owned 8.3 percent of all U.S. businesses; African Americans, 7.1 percent; Asian Americans, 5.7 percent; American Indians and Alaska Natives, 0.9 percent; and Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islanders, 0.1 percent. Veterans owned 2.4 million businesses in 2007, generating $1.2 trillion in receipts; another 1.2 million firms were 50 percent veteran owned. About 7 percent of veteran business owners had service-connected disabilities in 2002." as proof that there is some wrong doing by not including non minorities immigrants in the numbers. However if you had read, or not lied about it, you'd have seen the subtitle
"12. What is the role of women, minority, and veteran entrepreneurs?" Where does that say anything about immigrants, Kaltros? Try again.
Quote:
Your New York Times article isn't much better. Here's what I found by going straight to the source of the NYT article:
Quote:
Mexicans make up biggest number of business owners, while
immigrants from Middle East, Asia, and Southern Europe playing a disproportionate role . Mexican immigrants are
less likely than other groups to be small business owners, perhaps in part because a high share of Mexican immigrants are not legally authorized to work in the United States.
-snip-
Immigrants from some countries—including some with relatively small numbers in the overall population—are disproportionately likely to be business owners. Immigrants from the Middle East, Asia, and Southern Europe are particularly inclined toward business ownership.
Immigrants from Greece, for example, are a tiny fraction of all immigrants in the labor force, but 16 percent of Greek immigrants in the labor force are business owners—the highest share of any group. Immigrants born in Israel/Palestine (the Census does not disaggregate the two) are the group with the second highest rate of business ownership, followed by Syria, Iran, Lebanon, Jordan, Italy, Korea, South Africa, Ireland, Iraq, Pakistan, and Turkey.
-snip-
Immigrant business owners are most likely to be white, Asian, or Latino.
Among immigrant business owners, roughly equal numbers are white (34 percent), Asian (31 percent), and Latino (28 percent), with another 5 percent blacks and 2 percent identifying their race as “other.”
White and Asian immigrants are considerably more likely to be small business owners than
black or Latino immigrants—and, indeed, also much more likely than U.S.-born workers. Among immigrants in the labor force, 6.8 percent of whites and 4.7 percent of Asians are small business owners. By contrast, 2.0 percent of Latino immigrants in the labor force and 2.1 percent of black immigrants are small business owners. The share for U.S.-born overall is 3.3 percent, and for U.S.-born whites, the highest among U.S.-born groups, the figure is 3.8 percent.
http://fiscalpolicy.org/immigrant-small-business-owners-FPI-20120614.pdf
The actual study suggests that we should prefer white and Asian immigrants if we want job growth from immigration.
So since we've established you're apt to outright lie or omit information, let's take a gander at the piece of the article you "snipped" in its entirety.
"Mexicans make up biggest number of business owners, while immigrants from Middle East, Asia, and Southern Europe playing a disproportionate role Mexican immigrants are less likely than other groups to be small business owners, perhaps in part because a high share of Mexican immigrants are not legally authorized to work in the United States.
Yet there are nonetheless more small business owners from Mexico than from any other single
country. This is no surprise, perhaps, given the size of the Mexican population, though this does not seem to be the common image of immigrant small business owners." Oh s**t, look at that information you completely omitted that completely contradicts your claim. How funny.
Actually, what it's stating Kaltros, if you were able to comprehend basic math or English for that matter, is that while Mexican immigrants were less likely to be small business owners, they still make up the largest share of them. Meaning that relative to their population, they are less likely to own small businesses but STILL have the largest number of small business than any other single
country. Ooops. Look at that. You're wildly flailing and attempting to compare MEXICAN business owners to the statistics on racial breakdowns of business owners in the U.S. And doing a piss poor job at it at that.
Try again, Kaltros. Make this somewhat of a challenge, I feel like i'm boxing an infant.